Quote:
Originally posted by Dark_5.0
I agree that elevation shouldnt be considered when naming the 50 fastest.
Hears a twist though, in case of a tie the guy with the highest elevation gets the win
_________________________
This is exactly what this site needed, I think it will make it alot more fun.
Later,
|
Thanks for chiming in Dark 5.0, I was hoping to hear from you once Eric mentioned the issue of elevation. I like the twist and that sounds logical... but PKRWUD hit the nail on the head, it's not what you could've or should've run, it's what you actually run.
I will make a side note of some sort for those who are at a higher elevation and put them ahead of anyone they might tie with at a lower elevation. Good deal, sounds fair to everyone, I hope... I'm sure I'll hear about it otherwise.
And yes, this site needs a list.... just need some assistance and cooperation from the Pres. Hopefully he'll see the thread and act accordingly.
-Ryan