

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
motors done......woohooo
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 799
|
![]() just wondering if anyone had any negative effects with the 5.4 rods in a 347 stroker motor? with this combo, the oil ring intersects with the pin bore.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 593
|
![]() I believe coast high performance has a kit where the pin does not intersect the oil ring. Two of my buddies have 347's with different kits, and Ive never heard them complain. - John
__________________
89 notch-finally not stock!! ported gt40's, ported cobra intake, 65mm tb, 75mm maf, mac cai, lt's,prochamber, fms 1.6 rr, 125 shot. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
motors done......woohooo
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 799
|
![]() with that kit they use a 347 crank with a 5.3 rod opposed to the 5.4. i was just curious on how bad the blow by actually was. i have the 347 but am thinking about getting a 331 before i put it all together, if the blowby is going to be a problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
gear banger
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 1,144
|
![]() There is no issue with the 347 vs the 331. Machine work and assembley is the concern for a long life. A 302,306,327,331,342,347, etc... will all last the same in the same hp applacations. This is a myth that has been started and will not die!!!
__________________
79 Hatch: NA 347, Stage 2 Canfield Heads, Victor JR. Intake, Blueprinted Holley 750 HP, Solid Roller Cam, Shooting for 10's on motor 93 LX: Tremec, dual friction clutch, fms flywheel, Hedman shorties, O/R H-pipe Ricer hater's club member #49 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
motors done......woohooo
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 799
|
![]() what i mean is blowby, is there more than normal oil consumption with the oil ring below the pin bore. the motor will most likely get taken out at the end of each year for bigger and better things, but just curious if it will eat more oil than a 331. i have also heard that the 347 actually loses some upper rpm horsepower, because of the awkward rod angle, and that it somewhat binds up. these could all be myths though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
gear banger
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 1,144
|
![]() MYTHS. The reason that a 347 will make power at a lower rpm then a 302 is because it uses more air. Also 331's have the oil ring in the pin bore to. Don't let them fool you.
__________________
79 Hatch: NA 347, Stage 2 Canfield Heads, Victor JR. Intake, Blueprinted Holley 750 HP, Solid Roller Cam, Shooting for 10's on motor 93 LX: Tremec, dual friction clutch, fms flywheel, Hedman shorties, O/R H-pipe Ricer hater's club member #49 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|