

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: cent.wis
Posts: 203
|
![]() How high can and should I turn my engine? I have plans on getting it on the dyno soon to see where it starts to lose power. But I am curious so I had to ask. Here is the combo,92' 302, 0 miles,tfs trackheats,tfs stage 2 cam,ATI damper,frpp hyd lifters,all stock internals+arp rod bolts,hi vol oil pump,victor jr,proform 650 carb,1.6 tfs roller rockers,blue pump+adj reg,6an lines,all msd stuff,c4,4.10's. I only was planning on around 6k but can I run this thing higher? or will I bring it home in pieces...?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
|
![]() Don't think you'll gain anything after 6000-6500.
You didn't say it was balanced either. The dyno will show you where the power starts to fall off, you'll be surprised how low it maybe.
__________________
"Support our Troops" Dave 1968 Cougar 2004 Thunderbird 2007 F150 Harley-Davidson, SuperCrew 1986 LTD 1997 Ranger 1992 Honda Civic |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ride Hard
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
|
![]() He may be right about the power falling off at or before 6,000, but you can definately wing it higher then that before you have to worry about her coming loose. I would imagine you wont need to go much above 6,200 to see the best results, but the dyno will tell for sure. Your valve springs may limit your top rpms before you would have to worry about the engine coming apart.
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc 04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition 79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Milan, OH
Posts: 2,699
|
![]() That Victor Jr. will want to breath. I'm betting that you won't see peak HP until after 6400. I used to spin a similar motor (50-oz balance included) with a Stealth intake to about 7100. Valvetrain stability will be the key. Remember that volumetric efficiency improves with RPM, so spin that sucker as high as you can.
__________________
Jeff Chambers 1990 Mustang GT 10.032 Seconds / 137.5 MPH 14-time Street Warrior World Record Setter CRT Performance 2001 Tropic Green Mustang GT - 12.181 / 113.2 MPH 2002 Ford F-250 Crew Cab 7.3l Power Stroke - 17.41@77.2 "There's nothing boring about a small block automatic shifting gears at 9400 rpm!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: cent.wis
Posts: 203
|
![]() Jeff, would the hyd lifters be my problem with valve float. I just put in a new set of ford racing lifters when rebuilding the engine. The tfs trackheats are equiped with better springs (I guess). Now that it's all said and done I should have done a few things different. But I did'nt want to get in over my head.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Obviously the dyno tune will tell you what you need to know. But I'd shift at about 6K rpms if I were you. My combo is in my sig. below. I shift at 6K. If I bring it up to 6300 my valves start to float. I'd imagine yours would float around the same rpms as mine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Posts: 1,001
|
![]() Hydraulic (and especially hydraulic rollers) are a significant limiting factor regarding engine speed limit. I've seen this on engine dynamometers and heard it by word-of-mouth from local gearheads. I can't say I've ever had my motors up that high since I've usually built mine for low-end torque and reliability...plus there's that darn 6250 RPM limiter on the Mustang's EEC-IV.
![]() It makes perfect sense if you have ever had a hydraulic roller in one hand and a regular hydraulic in the other. The mass difference is amazing (relatively speaking), and if you've ever seen the internals of an engine while it's running, you'll better appreciate the abuse engine parts must withstand. Imagine having that lifter in your hands and shaking it back and forth about 3000 times a minute (equivalent to 6000RPM). Honestly, that's not even close to the stress the lifter undergoes, but you get the idea. ![]() Hence why I'm going solid roller when my project takes off after college. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Capri306, Moderator The Mustang Works Online 1979 Mercury Capri 1987 5.0L Mustang LX Notchback 1993 5.8L Eddie Bauer Bronco ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Rat Killer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold ass Ohio
Posts: 1,143
|
![]() I went with a solid roller cam for that reason too. Still figuring out what the engine wants as far as RPM goes, but to date it still pulls HARD at 8,000!
![]()
__________________
d-Con Racing "Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!" MICE need not apply..... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Milan, OH
Posts: 2,699
|
![]() Done right, the hydraulic rollers are NOT a limiting factor. I used to routinely spin STOCK lifters to 8500 rpm with higher spring pressures (and more duration) than most will run even with a solid roller cam. The Victor Jr. intake and carburetor combination wants to breath, RPMs is how you do it and RPMs are where you build volumetric efficiency.
Put it on the dyno and see where peak power is at. If the valves start to float before you get to peak power, then make some adjustments in the valve train. Set the preload at no more than 1/4 turn and a simple set of restricted pushrods should solve the majority of lifter-related issues. Valve float is generally related to the springs though, but there's always another set of springs that will solve that problem. As far as spinning stock parts, I used the same stock crank for all of 2002 and 2003 in my Street Warrior motor, one year at 50 oz-in and one at 28 oz-in, shifting at 7200-7500 all season, both seasons. One year in a stock block, one year in a B-50 block. Crank never broke, sold it when I bought a Scat crank and as far as I know the guy who bought it is still using it.
__________________
Jeff Chambers 1990 Mustang GT 10.032 Seconds / 137.5 MPH 14-time Street Warrior World Record Setter CRT Performance 2001 Tropic Green Mustang GT - 12.181 / 113.2 MPH 2002 Ford F-250 Crew Cab 7.3l Power Stroke - 17.41@77.2 "There's nothing boring about a small block automatic shifting gears at 9400 rpm!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Posts: 1,001
|
![]() Jeff, you're right; valve spring pressure is vital to the stability of the engine as speed climbs. However, you probably also realize that most people don't want to change valve springs (one of the most overlooked parts, imo). Also, that higher valve spring pressure creates more drag on the engine, which is why I like the solid rollers so much. Consequently, if you're spinning in the 7k+ range, that drag becomes inherent to the territory you're in, right?
![]() I suppose while we're on it, this is kind of like the whole question regarding the "maximum lift" you can have on (insert cylinder head manufacturer name here) heads. It's not about the lift, it's about the timing of the events that's important. So, you're absolutely right on about the duration, which is typically closely linked to the ramp rates of high-rev cams. ![]()
__________________
Capri306, Moderator The Mustang Works Online 1979 Mercury Capri 1987 5.0L Mustang LX Notchback 1993 5.8L Eddie Bauer Bronco ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Gallatin, Tn
Posts: 1,326
|
![]() gentlemen, you all have me wondering now how high I should be shifting my 331, 28oz balance, Trickflow stage 2 cam, double valve springs custom pushrods, extrude honed Vortech intake, ported TW heads, aluminum flywheel, 4.10 gear, aluminum DS, full exhaust, the works, crane ignition is adjustable and is set for a rev limiter now at 6200, think it would be safe or smart to open it up to lets say 6500? I know the dyno would be the smartest but relatively speaking I should be ok right?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Ride Hard
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
|
![]() Without a dyno to go by, is it still pulling nicely when you shift at 6200?
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc 04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition 79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Gallatin, Tn
Posts: 1,326
|
![]() yet to find out, still breaking it it....
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
![]() After you get it broken in, test it with a G-Tech to get a hp/torque curve read out. Not as good as a real dyno test, but will give a good idea as to what rpm the power starts to nose dive. Borrow the G-Tech from a buddy if need be.
Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Rat Killer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cold ass Ohio
Posts: 1,143
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
d-Con Racing "Nothing fancy, just 347 inches of RAT POISON!" MICE need not apply..... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Milan, OH
Posts: 2,699
|
![]() Broken in = 20 minutes at 2000 rpm at low load. After that it's time to let 'er wail! If the oil is warm, stand on it and see where it starts to drop off.
__________________
Jeff Chambers 1990 Mustang GT 10.032 Seconds / 137.5 MPH 14-time Street Warrior World Record Setter CRT Performance 2001 Tropic Green Mustang GT - 12.181 / 113.2 MPH 2002 Ford F-250 Crew Cab 7.3l Power Stroke - 17.41@77.2 "There's nothing boring about a small block automatic shifting gears at 9400 rpm!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: cent.wis
Posts: 203
|
![]() Now that the break in period has been brought up, How long should a new motor be broke in? Everyone has their own version. I have run my new motor for 15 minutes on the first start up and total time is about 40 minutes. Most being on jack stands with the wheels turning. (new tranny too). Also changed oil once and opened a couple of oil filters to check for debris. Found nothing abnormal. I am wondering if I make a few laps down the track at slow speed (to make sure the wheels are going to stay on) if everthing checks out can I hammer on it? or should I get some good run time first?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Gallatin, Tn
Posts: 1,326
|
![]() I was told 500 miles with non-synthetic oil for parts and seals, after 2k you can go synthetic. I hear lots of different things though.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Edelbroock RPM head on a 393 | Redge | Windsor Power | 3 | 06-22-2005 10:55 PM |
GM Engines | BLOCKER | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-13-2004 12:35 AM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 10-28-2002 04:57 PM |
Experience with Edelbrock RPM Package | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 0 | 10-27-2002 01:10 AM |