© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
09-19-2002, 12:58 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 536
|
1969 390s ??
I am considering buying a 69 with an original 390 in it and I was looking in my Chilton's book for that year, and it says that the 390 with an automatic transmission was rated at 270hp@ 4400rpm, and 390ftlbs@2600rpm. The 390 with the manual tranny was rated at 320hp@4800rpm and 427ftlbs@3200rpm.
Both motors are 10.5-1 with all the same specs. Why the difference of 50hp? What was different other than the trannys? Was there something done differently to the engines with manual trannys?
__________________
Dave 88 GT - 13.4@106 on street tires (2.2 60ft) My Stang RHC member #75 My stang is FOR SALE!! |
09-19-2002, 07:30 AM | #2 |
My poor 79 RIP
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Suisun City,
Posts: 2,320
|
Maybe it was at the rear wheels?!? I'm lost.
__________________
'84 mustang GT turbo '85 LTD '89 Camaro Irocz z28 '94 Lightning '96 Trans am |
09-19-2002, 09:45 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: calgary alberta canada
Posts: 366
|
Not sure, but I think the 270hp rating is a two barrel, and the 320 is four. Had the 270 2 barrel in my ranchero, after playing with it for 3 years and only getting a best of 15.1, I pulled it and put in the big 460. Havent run it yet, but the diference is amazing. Sorry, back to your question... If your chilton has cam specs, see if there different. Pretty sure for 69 the testing was done at the crank with no accs. so called gross rating.
__________________
93LXcopcarSOLD14.3@96 @ 4500ft 2.02 60ft on street tires. my 67 ranchero NOT A 390 ANY MORE! 460! 3.70's cast manifolds, comp cams 262H, performer, 750DP 100K out of 79 F250 NEW(oct20/02)14.58@95mph 2.3 60 ft corrects to:13.86@100 66 merc comet351w, isky roller 600 lift 268/260@.050, vic jr. 700DP, 5000stall, 4.56's c-4, 3400lbs with driver 12.3@110 @ 4000ft 1.69 60 ft corrects to:11.69@115 |
09-19-2002, 10:15 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brem., wa. usa
Posts: 5
|
I love big blocks, wish I knew more. But it sounds like the
270 number is off. The 320 sounds like a hi-po motor. I think those are alot different, headers, carbs, compresson and cams. The 406, which didn't come in Mustangs is only rated at about 406 horse, and that is the next step up from the hi-po 390. Well thats my opinion, I 'am sure there are plenty of better ones out there. If you can get a hi-po do it, those are great motors. |
09-19-2002, 11:08 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 536
|
According to the Chilton's for years 69-71, they are both 4bbl, 10.5-1 compression, and the only specs that are different are the spark plugs, idle speed, and the trannys. This book doesn't even mention a 2bbl at all. I dunno, maybe it's a misprint? How much power is expected to be lost to the drivetrain? Is there an average percentage?
There aren't any cam specs in this book. There's only a measurement in degrees of how far the intake valve opens, and they both say "16B" whatever that means. Last edited by DRASTiK; 09-19-2002 at 11:15 PM.. |
09-19-2002, 11:25 PM | #6 |
It's a lot like a race car
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 4,130
|
all 1960 390's in stangs were rated at 320hp. Chiltons sucks
__________________
1987 Buick T-type 1998 HD Electra Elide |
09-19-2002, 11:32 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: calgary alberta canada
Posts: 366
|
Dug out my trusty decoder book. The book(Catalog of American Car ID Numbers 1960-69) only lists 2 differnt 390's for 69. Engine code Y(2 barrel 270hp) and S(4barrel/high perf 320hp)
This is the fifth number in your VIN. This is also for all 69 fords. The mustang, according to this book, only came with the S code 390 in 1969. It does not make a distintion between auto or man trans. This also agrees with what I've heard in the past as well. I would think that chilton made a type-o. It happens.
__________________
93LXcopcarSOLD14.3@96 @ 4500ft 2.02 60ft on street tires. my 67 ranchero NOT A 390 ANY MORE! 460! 3.70's cast manifolds, comp cams 262H, performer, 750DP 100K out of 79 F250 NEW(oct20/02)14.58@95mph 2.3 60 ft corrects to:13.86@100 66 merc comet351w, isky roller 600 lift 268/260@.050, vic jr. 700DP, 5000stall, 4.56's c-4, 3400lbs with driver 12.3@110 @ 4000ft 1.69 60 ft corrects to:11.69@115 |
09-20-2002, 01:26 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 536
|
well that makes since. I always had more faith in Chilton's than I did in Haynes, but I guess it really doesn't matter. Nobody's perfect. Thanks for the info guys.
|
09-20-2002, 01:42 PM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
Chiltons
My ragged, dog eared, grease stained Chiltons 65-73 Mustang manual says for '69, 4-V only, 320@4600 / 427@3200.
Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 questions... | xxkewlguyxx | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 05-09-2002 01:23 PM |
Boss 302 (1969) Engine Bolts | markduanetaylor | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 11-17-2001 03:01 AM |
1969 Mach 1 Options and Data tags HELP ! :-) | Barts_65 | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 10-26-2001 12:31 AM |
boss 302 head bolt (1969) | markduanetaylor | Windsor Power | 1 | 06-22-2001 03:45 PM |
Richard Petty's 1969 NASCAR Ford Torino | CoolRides | Racer's Club House | 0 | 02-29-2000 11:25 PM |