MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-06-2002, 04:52 PM   #1
66StangGuy
Registered Member
 
66StangGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Diamond Bar
Posts: 258
Default 2.80's--4.11's gas milage?

i am going from 2.80's to a 4.11 set. i am somewhat confused should i see an increase or decrease in gas milage.

the rpm's will be higher but theres less strain on the engine so im not sure what way it will go. thanks. comments questions welcome.
__________________
66 mustang-292-Holley 4160-World Castings Windsor Sr.-Hooker super comp headers-MSD box & Coil.3.55 gears. B&M Z-Gate-Black leather racing seats with 4pt harnes.
66StangGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2002, 05:08 PM   #2
lx mike
Undescribable
 
lx mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Ft Myers Fla
Posts: 1,539
Default

It'll decrease cause it will be so much more responsive that it will be hard to keep a lite foot on the pedal. also you have no overdrive so will be buzzing on the freeway.
__________________
Rice Haters Club Member #101
lx mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2002, 05:09 PM   #3
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default Less

Going from 2.80 to 4.11 will give you less mileage and will spin your engine pretty tight on the highway. My 3.25's with a C-4 turn the engine at 3000 RPM @ 70 MPH (235/60/15's). 4.11's would turn in my car at almost 3800 RPM @ 70 MPH. 2.80's would turn about 2600 RPM @ 70 MPH in my car.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe

Last edited by Rev; 08-06-2002 at 05:29 PM..
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2002, 03:18 AM   #4
66StangGuy
Registered Member
 
66StangGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Diamond Bar
Posts: 258
Default

ok im still confused one person said it would go up the other down.

i dont really drive freeway so forget about that and what if i dont have a led foot and try to drive slowly to get better gas milage.

mechanically speeking what should it do?
__________________
66 mustang-292-Holley 4160-World Castings Windsor Sr.-Hooker super comp headers-MSD box & Coil.3.55 gears. B&M Z-Gate-Black leather racing seats with 4pt harnes.
66StangGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2002, 03:59 AM   #5
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

Both posts above said your mileage will get worse. It will. The bottom line is your engine will be turning at higher rpms for the same speeds. In order for an engine to turn higher rpms, more fuel is required. Your gas mileage will suffer, but it won't matter. You are going to be so busy trying to peel the smile off your face, you won't even notice the difference in fuel mileage.



Take care,
~Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2002, 05:42 AM   #6
66StangGuy
Registered Member
 
66StangGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Diamond Bar
Posts: 258
Default

ok thanks guys.
__________________
66 mustang-292-Holley 4160-World Castings Windsor Sr.-Hooker super comp headers-MSD box & Coil.3.55 gears. B&M Z-Gate-Black leather racing seats with 4pt harnes.
66StangGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2002, 02:10 PM   #7
gp001
Registered Member
 
gp001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 244
Default

see my post under "C4 with 280s"
__________________
347 CHP shortblock, TFS TW, Stealth, 650 Holley, Flowtech hdrs, Dr. Gas X, 2 Chmbr Flowmaster, MSD 6AL-Dist.& SS coil, March serpentine pulley system, Richmond 6 spd, CFDF, Hyd. TOB, Currie 9" w/3.50, alum Drv Shft, susp mods, TCP subframes & tower braces, Trans Am Racing power dual master, 4 wheel disc, 17x8 Torqthrust II's
Something up my sleeve
In a 66 coupe
www.2mfffabshop.com
gp001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2002, 09:56 PM   #8
ultrastang
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fordyce, AR, USA
Posts: 13
Default

Here's a couple of charts showing the RPM differeces at 60 MPH with varying tire heights, gear ratios, and with and without an overdrive transmission:

http://www.ultrastang.com/Rearinfo.asp?Page_ID=3
ultrastang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2002, 04:48 PM   #9
Jeff65
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 208
Default

If you put 4:11's in your car there's no way you can worry about gas mileage. You'll be getting around 10mpg. If you wish to get the best of both worlds, performance and gas mileage you'll need a five speed transmission; one with an overdrive fifth gear.
Jeff65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2002, 11:58 PM   #10
66StangGuy
Registered Member
 
66StangGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Diamond Bar
Posts: 258
Default

With my old 2.80's i was getting around 8.4 mpg. what do you think i should expect if i put 3.55's in my car? will there be that big of a difference in gas milage?
__________________
66 mustang-292-Holley 4160-World Castings Windsor Sr.-Hooker super comp headers-MSD box & Coil.3.55 gears. B&M Z-Gate-Black leather racing seats with 4pt harnes.
66StangGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2002, 07:55 AM   #11
John Z
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 102
Default

Is this a test? Your signature line says that you have 3.55 gears. Since your mpg is so low, I suspect you spend a significant amount of time this your right foot close to the floor. In this case, I don't think you will change mpg much.
__________________
68 coupe, 302 w/ Edelbrock performance parts, T5, 3.55 rear, needs paint!
John Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2002, 09:40 PM   #12
66StangGuy
Registered Member
 
66StangGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Diamond Bar
Posts: 258
Default

well actually i dont have the 3.55's yet. my car is up on jackstands because i took my old 2.80's out and found that there were 10 broken teen on them. So i bought 3.55's and just put it in my signature eventhough the gears are still in the mail. i was just wondering how much lower my mpg would go from the 2.80's to the 3.55's.

Also i do like to go fast and thats mostly the reason i bought the mustang and had an engine built just for my car but i think i also need to work on the carb a little. i think i need smaller jets for it because i lose power after about half throttle. i think its just running too rich but im waiting to get a air-fuel sensor anyway so thatway i can be for sure and get everything right without guessing. sorry for the confution.
__________________
66 mustang-292-Holley 4160-World Castings Windsor Sr.-Hooker super comp headers-MSD box & Coil.3.55 gears. B&M Z-Gate-Black leather racing seats with 4pt harnes.
66StangGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2002, 07:44 AM   #13
John Z
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 102
Default

I have 3.55 with a T5 and Edelbrock performer stuff. I think the acceleration is "more than adequate" (term used by Rolls Royce). I think you'll be very happy with the 3.55. To a large extent, your economy will be a function of your right foot, assuming the car is properly tuned.
__________________
68 coupe, 302 w/ Edelbrock performance parts, T5, 3.55 rear, needs paint!
John Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2002, 11:30 AM   #14
ex-lt1-guy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: O'Fallon IL
Posts: 93
Default

If you are trying to get good gas mileage and great acceleration there is no such thing, unless u have a fuelie with a 5 speed. When u have a 60s car like that unless its your daily driver mileage shouldnt be a huge concern, get the 4.11s and get a big smile on your face, just dont go on the highway, it will rev too high. You'll be happy with the gearset, I just helped my brother put in 4.11s and a 5 speed in is 67 mustang, and it pulls like crazy, but the difference is hes got fuel injection on his 289, so he actually gets decent gas mileage
ex-lt1-guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2002, 03:48 PM   #15
Edelbrock
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

so your saying

a mustang '66 5 speed don't go on the highway because mileage will be bad....


plzz explain

is the gearing of a manual geagbox that close ratio....
I thought the gearing of a 5-speed would be at leased the 5th like a overdrive or something

is a automatic than better for your mileage... i thought the other way around....
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2002, 04:36 PM   #16
ex-lt1-guy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: O'Fallon IL
Posts: 93
Default

no I was assuming that the 66 was a C-4, with a carbed 302 or 289 with a C-4 and 4.11s will not get good gas mileage regardless on the highway, due to the revs.
It might be a little better with a 5 speed or an aod, but it wont be much better with a carbed motor, you'll be looking at 11 -14 mpg at best with an overdrive, and thats if u dont ever get into it, otherwise your gonna be at 5-8. I have never cared about gas mileage on performance cars like these, with carbs it should be somewhat expected that your mileage will be less anyway. Is the motor built up in this 66?
ex-lt1-guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2002, 06:24 PM   #17
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default Overdrive

4.11 gears in an overdrive transmission, either auto or 5 speed, will be like a 2.80 without overdrive on the highway.

4.11X.7=2.88.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2002, 08:00 AM   #18
Jeff65
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 208
Default

I haven't driven my '65 long enough to break it in yet and have not truly checked the gas mileage. It is a 5 speed 3:50 gear set car and I can tell its getting good gas mileage already. The acceleration is good enough for me...I mean I'm quite happy with how the restoration project came out.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 65 mustang 5r1.jpg (33.6 KB, 5 views)
Jeff65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2002, 08:01 AM   #19
Jeff65
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 208
Default

Oops, wrong picture posted... Here's the one I meant to xmit.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 65 mustang 1r1.jpg (26.8 KB, 8 views)
Jeff65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2002, 08:55 AM   #20
Edelbrock
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

what is a good mileage?

Ltr/Km
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
where does the gas milage go. fordkid68 Classic Mustangs 9 05-27-2003 12:16 AM
Milage Checking on a 2000 GT SoulKeeper Modular Madness 1 05-05-2003 09:06 AM
F250 Milage bigredstang Built Ford Tough 3 11-12-2002 10:51 PM
gas milage 66StangGuy Classic Mustangs 2 09-11-2002 07:56 PM
c4 with 2.80's 66StangGuy Classic Mustangs 14 08-08-2002 02:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.


SEARCH