
                    © Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
                    
                  
                MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
| 
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2001 
				Location: Bloomington, IL 
				
				
					Posts: 26
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 I have found all sorts of Windors 351 blocks I can buy from people.  My dad and I are looking to put a 351 in my mustang 5.0 which is already fast.  He is saying go with the Cleveland, they are much better engines.  Any suggestions?  Are their alot of performance parts for the 351 I can get to beef it up to run 10s/9s?  Or do I stick with my high 10/low 11 302?  And work with that?  I can get either or.  I have a guy holding a 351c and a 351w for me.   
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	- Kevin  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 1999 
				Location: brooklyn center,mn,USA 
				
				
					Posts: 169
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 there are alot more aftermarket parts for the windsor, not to mention kits for installing it in the late model body.  The cleveland is a good motor, but costly to build.  You can make ALOT of power with the windsor fairly easily. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	------------------ 88LX notch, Speedpro EFI Procharged!  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 1998 
				Location: Az 
				
				
					Posts: 854
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			  http://www.kaufmannproducts.com/mustangs.htm  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	even have serpentine adapters... heheh ------------------ 84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer 3.55's, underdrives stock shorties stock cam, 1.7's 14.06@100.21, 255RWHP on a hot day 265 on the mph/weight chart  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered Member 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 1999 
				Location: Arcadia, CA, USA 
				
				
					Posts: 731
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Up until the 1980s, the 351W was considered inferior to the 351C, since the Cleveland had better flowing heads and a racing heritage.  But nowadays, there's a huge availability of performance heads, cams, intakes, and headers for the Windsor.  I also agree, it's cheaper to build a Windsor.   
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Given the availability of parts for the Windsor, it just doesn't make sense to stay with the old school thinking of running a Cleveland. You can tell your dad I said that, and tell 'em I've owned both engines  .------------------ Russ L '91 LX Procharger, 3 row intercooler, extrude honed Cobra intake, Mac full Length Headers, 30# inj., 73mm C&L, 75mm tb, E303 cam, 289 rods, ported E7 heads, MSD, T-Rex w/255 lph Walbro, 5 lug conversion, Cobra R wheels, 3.27 gears and Moser Axles.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
		
	
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| 351C vs 351W | stvneil | Windsor Power | 3 | 02-29-2004 10:25 AM | 
| 351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM | 
| NEED HELP ASAP !351W to 351C Swap | IeatZ28 | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 11-06-2001 12:45 AM | 
| HP #'s from a built 351W versus FMS 351 versus stroker | stroker393 | Windsor Power | 0 | 03-09-2001 10:24 AM | 
| 351W vs 351C | Five0 | Windsor Power | 2 | 01-26-2001 08:18 PM | 
                    
                  