Thread: 428 cj
View Single Post
Old 05-27-2000, 04:05 AM   #11
mustangII460
Factoy Five Roadster
 
mustangII460's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Sevier Co,Tennessee
Posts: 1,681
Post

Without putting anyting on the Dyno. Compare the weight of old cars vs new. Simple reasoning shows those old heavy Mustangs faster,running lower ET's. And with less Horspower? A "full house" 289 in 1966 pushed 400 Hp. and could be had as an option. Ford did choke the Boss 429 with a lousy cam. It would still run with the 428 though. Im not slaming anyone but to much data to support more Hp.

[This message has been edited by mustangII460 (edited 05-27-2000).]
mustangII460 is offline   Reply With Quote