© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
02-07-2001, 12:43 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 11
|
71 'Stang/ new 351W/ orig. C4 compatability
My 71 Mustang was originally a 302. I've got a 351W to put in. Can I just bolt up my original C4? I've fitted it all together on the garage floor but I'm wondering if the flexplate counterweight unbalance factor is right. Murray
|
02-07-2001, 10:33 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
|
Should bolt up to 351W without a hitch. They should also be 28 oz imbalance too.
|
02-11-2001, 11:33 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 11
|
Just to follow-up. The 157 tooth flexplate has the same imbalance and will work with the 351W as long as the converter, bellhousing and engine plate match up. I had trouble with the engine plate. It was hard to find one I think because they haven't used the 157 tooth set up since ?73. The plate for the larger flexplate is almost the same except the starter hole is about 1/2" different. Murray
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
Car Audio System in a 90 LX V8 stang convertible | ziggy_2k | Windsor Power | 2 | 05-21-2002 12:33 AM |
351W in an 84 stang | jerryIII | Windsor Power | 8 | 06-29-2001 04:04 AM |
HP #'s from a built 351W versus FMS 351 versus stroker | stroker393 | Windsor Power | 0 | 03-09-2001 10:24 AM |