© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
08-12-2001, 08:24 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, CA, USA
Posts: 2
|
rear end questions
Hello All,
Thanks again for all the prompt responses regarding the 289 mods thread that I posted. I had another question. When you guys talk about changing your gears to 3.50 gears or 3.55 or 3.73 etc etc., what exactly are you referring to? Is it the ring and pinion gears? Also, in reference to that question, what are the exact specs for a stock rear end on a 1965 Mustang 289? In my last thread someone recommended that I upgrade to 3.50-55 gears. What exactly will that do and if I plan on getting some newer gears, what is the recommended brand/part number? Everyone, thanks again so much in advance. You guys are great! Erik |
08-12-2001, 10:11 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
|
The numbers 3.50, 3.70, 3.89, 4.10, etc. are the numerical ratio of the rear. Yes, the ring and pinion. As in 3.50, the drive shaft makes 3.5 revolutions to one of the rear axle. The higher the number, the lower the rear. High number rears give more out of the hole acceleration. But, at the sacrafice of high RPM cruising down the highway. This is why O/D is so popular. It reduces the highway RPM.
Good rear for driving around and just plain all around use is a 3.50. As far what make, well there are alot of them out there. I'm pretty sure that a shop near you that does differential work can recomend one to you. |
08-12-2001, 10:17 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 380
|
As to your stock rear, you should have a ford 8inch differential. To check on the gears, you will need to look at the door tag and get the rear code. Someone here or a manual can decode the ratio you have from that.
|
08-13-2001, 01:07 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 208
|
2.80 gears with a 2 barrell carb, 3.00 gears if the car came with a 4 barrell. Chances are good it's 2.80's. Swap from 2.80 to 3.55's and you'll be wondering why every car didn't come equipped that way.
------------------ 66 GT Fastback,fuel injected 5.0, 5-speed, cable clutch, JBA's and duals, 3.40 gears and handling mods...just call me "Doc" |
08-13-2001, 06:59 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clayton, CA USA
Posts: 116
|
Depending on how much highway driving you do, you might think about 3.25s. My 289 tachs about 3,000 RPM going 70 MPH. That is plenty high for me. 3.55s would put you up another 500 or so RPM.
3.25s are a definite step up from the 2.80s, but still very nice on the freeway. I got the complete 3rd member from Currie. About $800 + shipping. |
08-13-2001, 07:26 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
My '66 with a C-4 and 235/60/15's also runs 3000 at 70 with a 3.25. That's why I didn't go any more than a 3.25. Diablo is exactly right about that. I got mine from Currie as well.
Rev ------------------ '66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph 1/4 mi. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1999 and newer... rear end questions | JBeryleC | Modular Madness | 8 | 03-21-2004 11:43 PM |
cobra rear questions | dragstang86 | Windsor Power | 3 | 07-02-2003 06:56 PM |
9" Rear End Questions!! | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 9 | 09-10-2002 11:05 AM |
9" rear end swap questions - Please respond | 2FastLX | Windsor Power | 2 | 08-21-2001 01:31 PM |
REAR END/ CLUTCH PACK QUESTIONS?? | 96SNAKE | Modular Madness | 2 | 07-09-2001 03:31 PM |