MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-12-2002, 08:11 AM   #1
HuKares
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2
Default The Bottom End

I'm looking to build an new engine for the 'stang this winter and wanted to get some ideas on building the bottom end to handle what I want. The 'stang is a '66 with the original 289 although I have access to 302's and 5.0's also. I plan to build the engine naturally aspirated for now and then add a centrifigal supercharger to it later. After I add the supercharger, I'd lke to produce something like 500 to 600 hp. My shift rpm's would be about 6500 the way the rest of the car is set up.
My question is how I should build the bottom end for this. Would I be able to use a stock crank? What rods are enough?(I have access to some 5.09 cat h-beam rods for cheap) and etc.? Would I be better off going with a stroker ( I drive the car often so I doubt I want a 347 with the oil control and wear problems)? Thanks for any help,
-Brian
__________________
'66 'Stang coupe 289(325HP), AOD, 4.62 gears
'67 'Stang fastback 390
HuKares is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2002, 12:44 AM   #2
HotRoddin
cranky old man
 
HotRoddin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Longview Texas
Posts: 683
Default Re: The Bottom End

Quote:
Originally posted by HuKares
After I add the supercharger, I'd lke to produce something like 500 to 600 hp.
-Brian
At 600 HP the cat rods are really boarderline ... You need the good stuff at 600 HP.
And maybe i didn't understand but you plan on slappin a blower on a 289 and making it crank out 600 HP ??
HotRoddin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2002, 09:55 AM   #3
WADS56
gear banger
 
WADS56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 1,144
Default

600hp with stock rods is not a good idea. If you want to turn 6500rpm's I would use arp main studs, and rod bolts with a nice set of rods. I would also have it ballanced to the 28oz not the 50oz. At 6500rpm the 50oz imballance will put some strain on your mains if you do it all the time. A main girdle would be a good idea incase it lets go, it will help save your expensive parts.
Wade


One more thing 347's do not have a oil control problem. Will people please stop posting this
__________________
79 Hatch: NA 347, Stage 2 Canfield Heads, Victor JR. Intake, Blueprinted Holley 750 HP, Solid Roller Cam, Shooting for 10's on motor
93 LX: Tremec, dual friction clutch, fms flywheel, Hedman shorties, O/R H-pipe
Ricer hater's club member #49
WADS56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Seat Bottom 66notchback Classic Mustangs 0 03-29-2003 01:28 PM
Building the bottom end HuKares Classic Mustangs 8 10-20-2002 11:36 PM
Do you want AFRs and a cam on a stock bottom? 88workcar Windsor Power 15 09-23-2002 08:15 PM
Twin turbos on stock bottom end? Sonics2042 Windsor Power 9 09-20-2002 06:48 PM
Repairing the Rust on the bottom lip of my hatch. Any tips or Suggestions???? MTU 50 Windsor Power 12 03-15-2002 02:12 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.


SEARCH