MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-14-2006, 01:17 AM   #1
rwhite65
Ride Hard
 
rwhite65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
Default Fuel tank sending unit

Ok, I have a feeling Rev will know this, but I need all the help out there in cyber space I can get. I am updating my fuel line this spring with the new pre- bent line I bought 3 years ago...figured it was about time to put on.

Here is the issue. If I put the new 3/8 line in place of the old 5/16, that leaves the sending unit as the weak link. I am not sure on what size the line is coming out of the tank, but what good is it going to do when I put a bigger line on, when I am still sucking from the same smaller tube? All the research I have done shows the same sending unit for the 65-68 cars. I can’t imagine the big block cars used the same line out of the tank.

Anyone dealt with this before? Any Suggestions?
thanks,
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I
AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc

04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition

79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored
rwhite65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 04:00 PM   #2
danford1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8
Default Re: Fuel tank sending unit

The NPD catalog states that 65-68 senders all have 3/8" fittings used on 67-68's. Part number 9275-1A $24.95.

An article in Ford Muscle showed how they made there own 1/2" line. Simply cut out old line, drilled bigger hole, welded bent 1/2" steel tube in and reconnected (solder I think) fuel sending unit to tube.

Danford1
danford1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 06:09 PM   #3
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default Re: Fuel tank sending unit

I still use the old 5/16" fuel line up to the engine compartment, then 3/8" to the carb. With 7-8 psi at the carb, I seem to be OK without any fuel starvation. I have often wondered what would be necessary if It needed 3/8" all the way through.

I think the alteration of the sending unit that danford1 describes is what would work to get the larger line from tank out to the fuel line. If the '67-68 sending units are actually 3/8", then I guess I would just try to use one and then just run a 3/8" from there on up to the engine.

What I can't seem to remember is if your engine is carbureted or if it's efi ? If efi, then we would be looking at a more complicated problem.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe

Last edited by Rev; 03-14-2006 at 06:34 PM..
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2006, 02:14 AM   #4
rwhite65
Ride Hard
 
rwhite65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Fuel tank sending unit

I am running a little ole 600 Holley right now, with no future plans of changing.

I guess maybe I jumped the gun. If the sending unit is already 3/8's, as long as it is not smaller then my fuel line I am ok with that. Guess when I get it out of storage I need to see what I have, then post
thanks guys,
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I
AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc

04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition

79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored
rwhite65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2006, 02:26 AM   #5
SCHOONER
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
Posts: 84
Default Re: Fuel tank sending unit

Hey Ryan

I'm looking at the same situation for my '66, 289cid.
Everything is ALL APART right now (engine is stripped & hanging in mid-air on the engine hoist)

Got me a 4bbl carb. new intake manifold. I want to put in a 22gal. tank ~
(new from a 1970 'stang, they tell me with a few minor alterations it can be done. I want that extra 6gal. of juice. )

I read somewhere that; what's the use of having a bigger fuel tank. And have that gas being sucked thru a 5/16th line.

IT'S LIKE SUCKING A SODA THRU A COCKTAIL STRAW.

So, a friend of mine said, first get an ELECTRIC FUEL PUMP, then install the 3/8ths fuel line out of the bigger tank right up to the carb.

Ryan, that's what I hope to do.
Now, what have you found out about OUR SITUATIONS

Any and all help and knowledge you've got; PLUS all you other great guys will help me also.

Hope to hear from you.

Schooner
SCHOONER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2006, 11:46 AM   #6
rwhite65
Ride Hard
 
rwhite65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Fuel tank sending unit

Schooner-
I initially thought a replacement sending unit came with a 5/16 line out of the tank. I have recently found out thanks to this thread that the replacement sending units have been bumped up to a 3/8 line outta the tank.

I bought a replacement 3/8 line to run from the sending unit to mechanical fuel pump (holley). I think this will be sufficient, unless I was gonna run something much aggresive then what I currently have.
I hope this helps,
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I
AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc

04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition

79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored
rwhite65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2006, 04:54 PM   #7
Gearhead999
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
Default Re: Fuel tank sending unit

SCHOONER,

It isn't necessary to run a 3/8 inch line for the engine combo you are going to be running. A 289 [4.6L] engine, 600 Holley, mild cam and build will have plenty of fuel from the 5/16 inch line. Also, just because the fuel tank will be bigger, doesn't mean that you automaticly need a larger supply line.

The larger fuel line is going to increase the "volume" of fuel that passes from the tank to the engine. Those 6 or so extra gallons aren't going to change that.

If you want to change the fuel line[s] to 3/8, by all means do it. You won't hurt a thing. But it is over kill for the engine you're going to run. Now....if it was a 428 cu.in. with an 850 cfm or dual 4-barrels....well that is something different.

Have a great day. Happy St. Patrick's day.
__________________
"Support our Troops"

Dave
1968 Cougar
2004 Thunderbird
2007 F150 Harley-Davidson, SuperCrew
1986 LTD
1997 Ranger
1992 Honda Civic
Gearhead999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2006, 06:55 PM   #8
rwhite65
Ride Hard
 
rwhite65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Fuel tank sending unit

Schooner-
Gearhead999 is absolutely correct. I also believe it is over kill for your combo. I am planning on adding to my setup and believe some day it will be needed for me.

I also believe an electric fuel pump would be trick for you, but not needed.

Good luck-
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I
AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc

04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition

79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored
rwhite65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sending unit for water gauge gbeals Classic Mustangs 1 06-21-2005 04:57 PM
what is the fuel tank capcity in 88 gt XBAJBUSX Windsor Power 6 10-08-2004 02:33 PM
Fuel gauge not working Mustang_289 Windsor Power 1 07-10-2002 11:57 PM
How big is my fuel tank? voggsson Windsor Power 1 05-12-2002 02:29 PM
Vapor Lock 67 shadetree mechanic Classic Mustangs 11 05-18-2001 10:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.


SEARCH