http://eatporsche.stangnet.com/

08-16-2000, 07:11 AM

http://eatporsche.stangnet.com/

That is going to be a sweat ride but I have donnt know if he can reach his lofty goal. What do u think?

69fastback · 08-16-2000, 03:10 PM

LOOKS LIKE A NICE CAR AS FAR AS MAKING HIS GOALS U CAN MAKE A MUSTANG BEAT ANY CAR IN THE WORLD WITH ENOUGH MONEY.

------------------
69 428 cobra jet:bored .030, forged aluminum pistons, C & A rings, Engle cam, Edelbrock intake, 750 cmf carb, Hooker headers, March pullies, all ignition componets MSD, Holley 7psi fuel pump, Art Carr C-6, TCI torque converter, 4:30 gears, H pipe, subframe connectors, lift bars.

I aso have a stock 96 GT.

John Z · 08-17-2000, 03:45 PM

whoa 69fast back. Given the the coefficient of air drag of classic mustangs is over 0.6 and modern cars are under 0.4, even if you put identical drive trains and the worlds best suspension in a Mustang your going to have problems wining high speed battles. Of course you can add aero parts to help the Mustang, but if you added enough to make the car competitive, it would no longer look like a classic. Does John Force's "mustang" remind anybody of a production vehicle?

08-16-2000, 07:11 AM	#1
imouer Guest Posts: n/a	http://eatporsche.stangnet.com/ http://eatporsche.stangnet.com/ That is going to be a sweat ride but I have donnt know if he can reach his lofty goal. What do u think?

08-16-2000, 03:10 PM	#2
69fastback IRAQ VET Join Date: Feb 2000 Location: high desert California Posts: 1,480	LOOKS LIKE A NICE CAR AS FAR AS MAKING HIS GOALS U CAN MAKE A MUSTANG BEAT ANY CAR IN THE WORLD WITH ENOUGH MONEY. ------------------ 69 428 cobra jet:bored .030, forged aluminum pistons, C & A rings, Engle cam, Edelbrock intake, 750 cmf carb, Hooker headers, March pullies, all ignition componets MSD, Holley 7psi fuel pump, Art Carr C-6, TCI torque converter, 4:30 gears, H pipe, subframe connectors, lift bars. I aso have a stock 96 GT.

08-17-2000, 03:45 PM	#3
John Z Registered Member Join Date: Feb 1999 Posts: 102	whoa 69fast back. Given the the coefficient of air drag of classic mustangs is over 0.6 and modern cars are under 0.4, even if you put identical drive trains and the worlds best suspension in a Mustang your going to have problems wining high speed battles. Of course you can add aero parts to help the Mustang, but if you added enough to make the car competitive, it would no longer look like a classic. Does John Force's "mustang" remind anybody of a production vehicle?