MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-03-2002, 03:36 PM   #1
bigcarguy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Macon/Covington/Athens, Ga
Posts: 2
Default largest possible engine in 64-66?

How large of an engine can be put in a 64-66 Mustang with little to no modifications?
bigcarguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2002, 04:02 PM   #2
67GTACoupe
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Paso Robles, Califorina
Posts: 39
Default Horsepower TV

Hey

They put a 351windsor in a 66 fastback with a hood cowl, a little grinding, shortor drive shaft with a T-5 transmission. and some bending of the exhaust pipes. you would probally have the easiest time putting a 347 stroker in then trying to fit a 351 though. my 0.2

steven
__________________
67 GTA Coupe with "S-Code" 390
Best E.T. Never Ran


Drive Fast, Race Hard, Beat Ricers.

Live your life a 1/4 mile at a time
67GTACoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2002, 06:44 PM   #3
MrWesson22
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Dacula, GA
Posts: 73
Default

You can put any 351W based engine in (up to 427cid in stroker form) relatively easily.
__________________
Neal

69 stang
351C/4sp
MrWesson22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2002, 07:05 PM   #4
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default

You can get a Ford crate engine 392 for about $6000 with out intake or headers. It makes 430 HP with an Edelbrock single plane intake, Holley 750 DP, and Hooker headers according to Ford. Others claim more like 450 HP.

Probably the cheapest HP you can buy for a '65-66.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2002, 12:24 AM   #5
pntrbil
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 19
Default

Early Mustangs were available from the factory with FE Big Blocks in them. Something about CJ (Cobrajet) and SCJ ( Super ...) comes to mind. This is all hazy but I think the first Shelby's were supercharged 289's but eventually all of them had the FE. FE's come in 352/360/390/428/ and 427 variations but I don't think any Shelby had smaller than a 390.

There are guys putting the later Lima series 400/429/460 Big Blocks in Mustangs too but you hear a lot of discussion about what the longest lasting spark plugs are.
pntrbil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2002, 12:47 AM   #6
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default

The original post was about what would fit '65-66 Stangs without much modification. FE's were not available until '67. Without a whole lot of modification, only small block Windsors will fit '65-66 Mustangs.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2002, 02:06 AM   #7
Frankenstang65
Registered Member
 
Frankenstang65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 79
Default

I've got a 351W in my 65 coupe and would highly recommend it. That much hp and torque in such a light car is crazy, and the performance potential for these motors is extemely high.

A word of caution though....

You have to make sure to use a set of 66 motor mounts when you install it (earlier maounts make the engine sit up too high)

Depending on what year 351 you get, the radiator outlets and inlets may not line up with the stock radiator in the car, that may also be a problem.

Also, underhood space is pretty tight, this makes header install and even just getting to the spark plugs a bit more of a chore.

For the most part, it's an easy swap. And as far as I know, it is the largest small block that can be wedged into a 65-66 body without shock tower mods (if you want more cubes you can still stroke it out to 427). I'm not positive, but I think the 351C is too big as well.

Build a 427 stroker.... that would be so bada$$....

later
__________________
1965 Coupe: 351W, comp cam, Aluminum Systemax II heads (2.02/1.60), 1.7 Cobra full roller rockers, Edelbrock intake, Holley 650 double pumper, Mallory Unilite, MSD-6AL, MSD Blaster 2 coil, MSD heli-core plug wires, Hedman headers, 2 1/2" exhaust (GT style) w/ 40 series delta flows, 69 C4 w/ shift kit, shelby traction bars, 3.55:1 rear

Daily Driver:
1989 GT- 5spd, K&N (no silencer), Shorty Headers, King Cobra Clutch, Flowmaster Force II Cat-back
Frankenstang65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2002, 09:59 AM   #8
pntrbil
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 19
Default

I stand corrected. I missed the part about 65-66. Actually, I personally wouldn't put an FE in a 67 or later anyway because it must be a bear to work on. My daily driver is a 65 Ford F250 with an FE352 and as much as I love that old dinosaur of a motor, it'll never see the inside of my 68.
pntrbil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2002, 01:03 PM   #9
mustangman65_79
My poor 79 RIP
 
mustangman65_79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Suisun City,
Posts: 2,320
Default

u can fit a 351w in one, but it's a pain to work on. A storker 302 I think is better. But if u want raw hp, 351w stroked would be the way to go.
__________________
'84 mustang GT turbo
'85 LTD
'89 Camaro Irocz z28
'94 Lightning
'96 Trans am
mustangman65_79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2002, 08:37 AM   #10
Gearhead999
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
Default

You can put any engine in with enough work.

Heck, put a Hemi in, use a torch and alot of fabrication and you got it.

Easiest would be a stroke 302 [ie 347] or 351W [ie 426-427].

Just depends on how deep your pockets are and how much work you want to do.
__________________
"Support our Troops"

Dave
1968 Cougar
2004 Thunderbird
2007 F150 Harley-Davidson, SuperCrew
1986 LTD
1997 Ranger
1992 Honda Civic
Gearhead999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2002, 04:27 PM   #11
Idhomustang
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: boise,idaho
Posts: 220
Default Well let me see?

How large of an engine can be put in a 64-66 Mustang with little to no modifications?

The early cars were designed for the then new 289, as we all know 64-65. The early Cars 64-65 should remain 289 or small based windsor cars, the shock towers are closer on them then the 66, which is the first year that I would recommend implanting the larger windsor into.
If you do go ahead and swap in a 351 W try if possible to a set of early hp ex. manifolds, or a good set of quality headers that fit snug, that will help. As we all know the 351- can be built up to about 470 cubes right now using a Ford Motorsport block, but if your like me they cost way to much money unless one falls from the sky,undamaged I'm likely to continue to build motors with the cast iron 70- and later blocks.
The early big block cars you read about and see, once in a great while were factory drag cars or other wise, modified for big blocks, by widening the shock towers. I owned at 67 Gt with a 390 and it was pretty easy to work on,all things considered. My younger brother had a 428 car of the small year, both coupes. I wish I had kept both of these cars I let far to many cherries slip though the ole fingers..
The small 302 based motor can be stroked and bored to about 350 or so cubes if you really wanted too. Probe has kits that make the possible, with the right heads and cam, these can be very powerful motors and would serve any early model owners needs. And if you are not good at building motors you can install one of Fords Gt-40 motors rated at 320 horses, and make the conversion to fuel injection..
__________________
393,9.5" 351W,830 Holley,Victor Jr,Home made Cool Air Pan,
Pro Billet MSD,
MSD 6AL,
XE 284H Xtr-Com cam,
240-246 @.050,
540-544,
M/T Et streets,
Mac Upper and Lower, Control Arms,
3:73 US Gear,Mini Spool,
Eagle Long rods,
Mac Windage tray,
KB Pistons,
Scat crank,
4000 rpm stall convertor,
C-4 trans,
Airflow Research 185cc,
Hooker long tubes 3", exhaust,
S&W 6 point roll cage,
11.2 at 121 mph.
Idhomustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2002, 09:29 PM   #12
gp001
Registered Member
 
gp001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 244
Default

You may want to consider, as a follow up question,

How big a tire can I stuff into my 66 to handle the power

Unless you just want to go down the 1/4, then stuff on a set of slicks
__________________
347 CHP shortblock, TFS TW, Stealth, 650 Holley, Flowtech hdrs, Dr. Gas X, 2 Chmbr Flowmaster, MSD 6AL-Dist.& SS coil, March serpentine pulley system, Richmond 6 spd, CFDF, Hyd. TOB, Currie 9" w/3.50, alum Drv Shft, susp mods, TCP subframes & tower braces, Trans Am Racing power dual master, 4 wheel disc, 17x8 Torqthrust II's
Something up my sleeve
In a 66 coupe
www.2mfffabshop.com
gp001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 03:50 PM   #13
ramnaraina
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2
Default 351c Into 1968 Coupe??

Hi, I intend slotting a 351 cleveland from a Fairlane 500 into my 68 coupe but are concerned about the following:
1. Would it fit with the original cast iron headers.
2. Could I use the original 289 engine mounting brackets. (They however look different).
3. Once installed can I swap the 2 barrel with my 4 barrel (would the hood close?).
4. How difficult would it be to change spark plugs?

Thanks in advance.

Jeffery
jeffery@iafrica.com
ramnaraina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 01:03 AM   #14
rwhite65
Ride Hard
 
rwhite65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: largest possible engine in 64-66?

Bigcarguy-
Your original question has been answered, so I will leave that be.
With such a light car, keep in mind that a 347 is probably going to be lighter then the 351w, helping to keep the front end lighter. That is, if you planed to make the car handle as well.
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I
AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc

04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition

79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored
rwhite65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rare Mustangs....Got One? 1969Mach1 Blue Oval Lounge 22 09-25-2010 04:59 AM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Classic Mustangs 8 06-16-2005 11:43 AM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Racer's Club House 0 05-12-1999 02:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.


SEARCH