MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-06-2003, 08:10 PM   #1
rwhite65
Ride Hard
 
rwhite65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
Default oil pan differances?

I have a 74 302 in my car. The oil pan was on it when I got the car, and after my recent wreck, it is dented and going to be replaced. My local Body/mechanic shop is acting like the 74-78 oil pans are hard to find. I believe a 289-302 1965-1973 era oil pan should work just fine.

I think the block is out of a thunderbird maybe....but can think of no clearance issues with using the earlier era pans. Any effects on the oil pump area encountered?
thanks,
Ryan
I think all of the mods that could effect it are in my signature.....if not, I do have long tube headers....but they should be no where near that area.
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I
AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc

04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition

79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored
rwhite65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2003, 09:27 PM   #2
mustangman65_79
My poor 79 RIP
 
mustangman65_79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Suisun City,
Posts: 2,320
Default

Ok, I could be wrong, but the only two oil pans I can think of for Ford, other then after market 7 Qt and stuff, are the normal front sump oil pans, and the 80's to 90's Fox body rear sump double hump oil pans.

So any early type oil pan for a 302 should work just fine. Maybe he was thinking since parts for those cars are hard to find, that those would be too.
__________________
'84 mustang GT turbo
'85 LTD
'89 Camaro Irocz z28
'94 Lightning
'96 Trans am
mustangman65_79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2003, 10:54 PM   #3
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default Summit?

I think Summit carries either kind new for not too much $$. I'll bet local salvage yards have them cheap.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2003, 05:13 AM   #4
rwhite65
Ride Hard
 
rwhite65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
Default

I thought I was right on this. I think they rely on what their "book" says...and nothing elses sometimes. I was going to put and aftermarket 7 qt pan on it, but got worried that the pan would be to low......the car sits really low now as it is.
thanks guys,
ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I
AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc

04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition

79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored
rwhite65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Differances in Track Heat and regular TW heads?? 5ohCOUPE Windsor Power 3 03-11-2003 08:23 PM
differances in 5.0 COBRA66 Blue Oval Lounge 4 08-24-2001 12:25 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.


SEARCH