MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-31-2003, 05:58 PM   #1
zach0
Registered Member
 
zach0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 227
Default Harmonic Balancer

Do I need a 28oz. or a 50oz. Balance, stock crank and flywheel? On a 289. Old Balancer does not say.
__________________
1980 RX7 with 289 Ford V-8 bored .030 over, Very radical cam, Torker 2 high rise intake, Holley 650 Carb, MSD Nascar 6ALN ignition, MSD coil and distributor, Headers with dual open side exhaust. Over 300 horse.

1966 Mustang still in progress
zach0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2003, 06:48 PM   #2
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default 28 oz., not sure though

I think it's the 28 oz. Just get the stock Ford one for the '66 289 non Hipo. It'll be the correct one. I got mine from John's Mustang here in Houston but other Mustang parts places will have them too. Mine was about $100 a few years ago.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2003, 03:35 AM   #3
mustangII460
Factoy Five Roadster
 
mustangII460's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Sevier Co,Tennessee
Posts: 1,681
Default

Rev is correct: 28.2 oz
__________________
Frank
mustangII460 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2003, 08:40 PM   #4
mustangman65_79
My poor 79 RIP
 
mustangman65_79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Suisun City,
Posts: 2,320
Default

While we are here, I used a new Balancer from a 5.0 coversion kit, on a 67' 302, I guess it was right because the motor runs smooth.
__________________
'84 mustang GT turbo
'85 LTD
'89 Camaro Irocz z28
'94 Lightning
'96 Trans am
mustangman65_79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 05:13 PM   #5
Jeff65
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mustangman65_79
While we are here, I used a new Balancer from a 5.0 coversion kit, on a 67' 302, I guess it was right because the motor runs smooth.
I assume you used the rest of the conversion kit and the resultant motor uses 351w firing order? If the firing order is 351w then you'd be using the 50 oz in imbalance components.
Jeff65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 05:23 PM   #6
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default Firing order?

Isn't the firing order determined by the cam used? Either the 351W order with a 351W cam or the 289/302 firing order if that cam is used. I'm pretty sure a 351W cam can be used in the 289/302 simply by changing the firing order or vice versa.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2003, 09:20 AM   #7
Jeff65
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 208
Default Re: Firing order?

Quote:
Originally posted by Rev
Isn't the firing order determined by the cam used? Either the 351W order with a 351W cam or the 289/302 firing order if that cam is used. I'm pretty sure a 351W cam can be used in the 289/302 simply by changing the firing order or vice versa.

Rev
I made the assumption that if it was a 5.0L conversion kit, then it used 5.0L rotating components, crank, cam, etc. Else why call it a 5.0L conversion?
Jeff65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 01:48 PM   #8
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mustangman65_79
While we are here, I used a new Balancer from a 5.0 coversion kit, on a 67' 302, I guess it was right because the motor runs smooth.
You're probably right Jeff, but I just assumed it was an early 302 and that he used a 5.0 balancer. Sounds like it worked though.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 01:52 PM   #9
Jeff65
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rev
You're probably right Jeff, but I just assumed it was an early 302 and that he used a 5.0 balancer. Sounds like it worked though.

Rev
working is the key ingredient, isn't it? Can't argue with success!
Jeff65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 10:52 PM   #10
trevor'72
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 35
Default windsor firing order

The firing order can be interchanged on the 5.0. Did you know the 5.0 HO (high output) had the windsor firing order, stock? And no the cam/ crank don't have to be changed. Wierd EH? Guess it's just a Ford thing? Not sure about the balancer, whether they were different ones or if that's even affected by the firing order at all.

Cool for detail are what mke this hoby fun! Any one else got any interesting trivial knowledge?

Trevor
trevor'72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2003, 05:57 PM   #11
mustangman65_79
My poor 79 RIP
 
mustangman65_79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Suisun City,
Posts: 2,320
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rev
You're probably right Jeff, but I just assumed it was an early 302 and that he used a 5.0 balancer. Sounds like it worked though.

Rev
It is an early 302, but with a 5.0 water pump, oil pan, harmonic balancer, and timing chain cover. Standard firing order.

I was told that u did have to change the cam in order to change the firing order. Because I knew of people who used newer roller cams, and they had to change the firing order. Look at your summit for cams, one cam uses the 1-3-7 I think it is, and another one uses the 1-5-3.
__________________
'84 mustang GT turbo
'85 LTD
'89 Camaro Irocz z28
'94 Lightning
'96 Trans am
mustangman65_79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Harmonic Balancer Suggestions jim_howard_pdx Windsor Power 5 02-28-2008 11:32 AM
Harmonic Balancer 95_MUSTANG_95 Windsor Power 3 05-28-2003 09:48 AM
Harmonic Balancer Installation 90LxDroptop Windsor Power 3 12-30-2002 03:36 AM
Harmonic balancer trouble 90LxDroptop Windsor Power 4 12-03-2002 10:49 AM
Which harmonic balancer? NOSstang89 Windsor Power 2 05-21-2001 11:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 PM.


SEARCH