View Single Post
Old 03-08-2002, 01:30 PM   #14
Mercury
The Redneck James Bond
 
Mercury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 1,707
Default

Dang. I didnt see this thread till it was to late. ThunderBolt beat me to it.

I have no doubt that the Net Flywheel Horse power is as claimed by Ford in the 60's.

As Thunderbolt mentioned though, the ways Horsepower is rated now is diffrent. Back then it was rated with no nothing, no Powersteering, no Waterpump, No Fan, no AC.

Something else to think about is, how much of a drag those old Power Steering pumps and AC compressors put out. Todays stuff is alot more effiecint and doesnt take as much power to turn.

I think 120-130 RWHP sounds about right for a loaded C-Code 289, thats with an auto, and power steering.

I wonder what my ol' 289 turns out. Its got some balls to it. And in that light car it screams along pretty good.
__________________
64 1/2 "D" code Red Mustang Coupe.
Red Baron,

2000 Perf Red Mustang GT. 5spd. Stage 2 CNC heads with Large Valves, Comp Cams (270-274 dur .550 lift), Forged Crank, DRP pistons, Manly H-beams, Pro M 87 mm Mass Air, 24lb Inj, 75mm TB, Plenum Spacer ,Long Tube Headers, Homemade H-pipe, 2 chamber Flows, 4:10's, Steeda Tri-Ax, LKW 70/30's, Eibach Drag Springs, Steeda SubFrames, Battle Boxes, Rear Girdle, Adj uppers, Alunimum Drshft, Southside Lift Bars.

Project Cars, 64 1/2 6cyl coupe, 1930 Model A Nostalgia Rod.
Mercury is offline   Reply With Quote