

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 483
|
![]() I`m thinking of loosing the 670 cfm carb on the 351C and going with a 750DP. The kicker is i`m not sure what cam is in the car. The guy I bought it from didnt know, but said it was a comp cam 2 above stock. I`m planning of throwing a 100 shot at the car soon for extra fun. Is it worth it or should I stay with the 670?
__________________
1969 Mach 1 351C with a c6(for now) Sold 92 Rag Top GT Procharged & intercooled DSS 331 LC Holley Systemax 2 Intake, Edelbrock RPM Heads,E 303 ,blow thru air meter, race bypass, 42 pph injectors,65mm tb,1.7 rr, Mac long tube headers w/off road H pipe, Force 2 catback, TKO,Pro 5.0, K&N, Alum DS,3 core radiator, subframe connectors,3.73`s, Nitto DR`s and a Heavy Foot. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
cranky old man
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Longview Texas
Posts: 683
|
![]() Everytime that question is asked around here, we all get in a fist fight
![]() Rod
__________________
Under Construction: 64 Falcon 372 cu in. stroker 1:72 rod ratio 6.250" rods (long rod), Comp Cams XE274 230/236 520/526 @ .050, Scorpion Rollers, Roush 200 irons, 10:1 Keith Blacks, Hedman long tubes, 750 Holley DP, Edelbrock Victor Jr., C4 3500 stall, gears and tires to be anounced. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
|
![]() Agree with HotRoddin for the most part.
A drivable street car with an automatic should be OK with the 670. Also, the automatic doesn't need a double pumper or mechanical secondaries. Just overkill. Street driving/racing depends on low end torque more then anything else. Large carbs kill low end punch.
__________________
"Support our Troops" Dave 1968 Cougar 2004 Thunderbird 2007 F150 Harley-Davidson, SuperCrew 1986 LTD 1997 Ranger 1992 Honda Civic |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 483
|
![]() Thanks for the replies. Looks like im gonna stay with the 670 for now. I just wasnt sure if the 750 would have been better with a shot of spray. The Holley site lists the 670 for 300-400 hp cars.
__________________
1969 Mach 1 351C with a c6(for now) Sold 92 Rag Top GT Procharged & intercooled DSS 331 LC Holley Systemax 2 Intake, Edelbrock RPM Heads,E 303 ,blow thru air meter, race bypass, 42 pph injectors,65mm tb,1.7 rr, Mac long tube headers w/off road H pipe, Force 2 catback, TKO,Pro 5.0, K&N, Alum DS,3 core radiator, subframe connectors,3.73`s, Nitto DR`s and a Heavy Foot. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
change jets or increase carb size | 82 GT | Windsor Power | 4 | 06-29-2004 07:30 PM |
Need opinions on new combo about headers and carb size. | ciara | Windsor Power | 2 | 10-05-2003 10:36 PM |
carb size | lskarritt | Classic Mustangs | 9 | 01-05-2003 03:01 PM |
CARB SIZE??? | 88PONY | Windsor Power | 31 | 08-13-2001 10:28 PM |
Carb size? | 84_GT350 | Windsor Power | 23 | 02-27-2001 11:14 PM |