

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
|
![]() My engine builder made the suggestion to me that we avoid the hydraulic roller camshaft and lifters due to the $$ of them. The car is a 93 Mustang and the 392 I'm building will be EFI equipped with Carb#'s on all parts (well, almost all the parts :-) in hopes of passing emissions with a smog pump. He also commented that the hydraulic roller setup is not worth the money for a daily driven street 392 stroker that won't be seeing 6-7K Rpm's on the street. I will be taking it to the strip occassionaly. He also said the final decision was of course up to me. I already bought the Crane 1.6 Gold Race Roller Rockers....What do you think? Go with the hydraulic roller or something else??
------------------ In progress for Spring: 93 GT less motor and tranny, 8 pt cage, chute, Sothside Machine bars & Sub-frames, 3.73's '69 393 stroker Edlebrock Performer heads, Performer RPM Upper & Lower Manifold..Crane Gold 1.6 Rollers..BBK 70MM TB & cats..30lb Injectors..Cartech Fuel System.. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where to street race in Dallas/Fort Worth-Tx??? | keithclements | Stang Stories | 4 | 06-04-2010 02:56 PM |
Hydraulic Roller Lifters - Help Me Decide | NO SLO PK | Windsor Power | 5 | 07-28-2003 04:04 PM |
Solid Roller ? | STROKER BILLY | Windsor Power | 5 | 11-19-2002 12:04 AM |
351W roller conversion | Capri306 | Windsor Power | 4 | 02-14-2002 04:49 PM |
Solid, Hydraulic, Roller, Non-Roller... Pros and Cons | 2FastLX | Windsor Power | 10 | 12-24-2001 10:54 PM |