

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
5.00000 my
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 12
|
![]() I have a '65 mustang that was originally a V8 automatic car, but someone put a L6 and a 3 speed in it. So i am putting a 289 and a C4 back in it. But after I put the drive train in, the drive shaft is about two inches to long any ideas? a easy fix will be to shorten the drive line but i want to know what the problem is, Ya know?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
65 coupe
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: missouri
Posts: 11
|
![]() I believe the 3 speed is shorter than the C4 requiring a longer driveshaft. You may need to find an original V8 driveshaft.
Are the motor and tranny mounts in the original positions for the V8? make sure you have the correct tranny crossmember for the C4 as well |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
5.00000 my
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 12
|
![]() yes i have got at drive shaft for a v8 c4 and a 9inch rear end that is what confuses me so much every thing is back to stock and it will not fit. like i said before the only thing that is different is the motor mount perches are from a 66 but that only moves the engine up a .25''
__________________
1965 mustang 289 no name yet 1989 5.0 hatch new to the family 2005 V6 soon to be 300 horses in one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
65 coupe
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: missouri
Posts: 11
|
![]() the nine inch rear is larger than the original 8. That could be your issue
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
5.00000 my
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 12
|
![]() it is a 9 inch not an 8 inch so that should work original was a 9 inch with 4.11s that is all stock so i dont know
![]()
__________________
1965 mustang 289 no name yet 1989 5.0 hatch new to the family 2005 V6 soon to be 300 horses in one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 950
|
![]() In 65' the only cars that got the 9" were the shelbys, so jim2f is probably right.
__________________
Alex |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
5.00000 my
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 12
|
![]() oh that is very weird it is a 9 i know it. some one had to swap it out then i will double check. thanks for the help
![]()
__________________
1965 mustang 289 no name yet 1989 5.0 hatch new to the family 2005 V6 soon to be 300 horses in one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
5.00000 my
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 12
|
![]() hey thank you for all you help. come to find out i am an idiot it is a 8'' rear end i got the correct drive line and she is running now thanks again
![]()
__________________
1965 mustang 289 no name yet 1989 5.0 hatch new to the family 2005 V6 soon to be 300 horses in one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
|
![]() I had the same problem and as I saw this post it somewhat helped me on my mustang that was also previously an automatic car... thanks for the post!
__________________
My Mustang GT Convertible |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1965 Mustang Convert C4 to T5 | sblackford | Classic Mustangs | 0 | 05-21-2005 01:58 PM |
How much is a 1965 mustang worth? | zepherman | Classic Mustangs | 13 | 08-12-2002 04:00 PM |
1965 Mustang Rally wheels | mikoc | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 01-24-2002 12:15 PM |
First Mustang (1965 | Big-D | Classic Mustangs | 7 | 12-27-2000 05:01 PM |
t56 in a 1965 mustang coupe | yusuf | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 04-04-2000 10:19 PM |