MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post

Rev · 02-10-2003, 10:27 PM

Missed the RWHP denotation. My bad. 675 rwhp and 2900 lbs. into the analyzer would be 9.47 @ 143. The analyzer uses track weight though, so it includes driver, fluids, etc. for a total weight. So if the 2900 is dry vehicle weight without the driver, the et/trap speed would be a hair slower on the analyzer.

Rev

02-10-2003, 10:27 PM	#4
Rev Registered Member Join Date: Nov 1998 Location: Houston, Tx. Posts: 3,887	RWHP Missed the RWHP denotation. My bad. 675 rwhp and 2900 lbs. into the analyzer would be 9.47 @ 143. The analyzer uses track weight though, so it includes driver, fluids, etc. for a total weight. So if the 2900 is dry vehicle weight without the driver, the et/trap speed would be a hair slower on the analyzer. Rev __________________ '66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe