|
2000 v6 auto vs. 1987 5.0 auto
My friend just bought a stock 1987 5.0 L auto. He keeps telling me that it will beat my 2000 v6 auto (w/ dual borla exhaust) because he doesn't give the v6 any of the respect that it deserves. We went to a local road that has a long straight away at about 1:00 A.M. to run. I was pretty nervous, cause this 5.0 is pretty loud and mean sounding. We just called out 1,2,3 and went. I had traction control off and had considerable wheel (right...) spin at takeoff, but he had a pretty good start. He took me off the line by about 1/2 and it stayed that distance until I hit second gear when I started to pull past him. By the top of second I was about a car ahead of him and just kept slowly pulling on him until we hit about 100 m.p.h when we stopped (I would guess I was a couple cars ahead at this point). He was pretty impressed by the performance of the new v6s, especially since they can beat the old 5.0s.
|
hmmm.....
What does a V6 2000 run on the quartermile? |
What does that V-6 run at the track? Just a little curious.
Rev ------------------ '66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph 1/4 mi. |
Damn Lizard, we must have been typing simultaneously. Oh well, maybe great minds run in the same direction, LOL.
Rev ------------------ '66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph 1/4 mi. |
i've never taken it to the track, im guessing somewhere in the 15s on a good day
|
|
What is the horsepower for the new 2000's v-6???
------------------ 1997 Black Cobra Convertible. #2788 of 3088 Mostly Stock 1988 5.0 LX Convertible -Work Car...Few Mods. |
2000 V6's have 190hp. Figure the Borla dual added 10-12, so close to 200hp now. I dont think this is a BS kill. The 87 only has 25 more hp, and could potentially have more than a few problems, being that old, especially with the tranny. I think a stock 5.0 auto in great condition could run a 15.0. I stock auto v6 could run maybe a 15.5. It is a bit hard to swallow, but I could believe it.
------------------ Black 2000 GT Magnaflow Catback, K&N |
nice kill...i can believe it!!!
[This message has been edited by EZRIDN (edited 03-20-2001).] |
Depending on how well the new V-6's run I think he might be able to beat him. The guy who ports my heads has a 90 LX hatch with a built AOD (2200 stall and shift kit) with 3.55 gears and bone stock everything else. He says he can only get mid 15's out of it. That is pretty bad if you ask me.
------------------ 88GT stock shortblock, GT-40 iron heads, Edlebrock Performer intake, 24# inj, Pro-M 75mm Bullet MAM, 3.73, hurst short throw, F-303, electric fan, alum rad, FMS HD clutch, R134a ac conversion, 70mm TB , and some other stuff I probably forgot, 13.02@106 with a 1.87 60ft |
I saw in MM&FF where they got a 99 V6 5spd to 14.9's so figure the auto makes it a 15.3 I have seen several auto 5.0's only hit mid 15's so I don't have a problem beleiving this kill. Plus the borla dosn't hurt, that and the new AOD are a lot better than the old ones and the 99 probably had a lot less miles.
Sweet kill. Just watch for the 99% of the 5.0's that arn't stock. |
I believe it. One of my best friends used to have an 89 LX with an auto. It had a Mac H pipe, a mac cat back and a crane ignition and some other junk. It still only ran mid to high 15's. It had a LOT of miles though.
------------------ 95GT B303 cam, 1.7 rockers, 65mm TB, 73mm MAF, milled heads, 355's K&N, off road pipes, pulleys, msd coil, 9mm wires, Tremec 3550, Pro5.0 shifter,10.5 Motorsport clutch, FMS aluminum driveshaft, weld in subframe connectors |
He doesnt sound like a flame starter anyway. And if the 5.0 is old and hasnt been upkept at all its very possible.
------------------ 1966 Baby blue Coupe, 289 w/ man. 3-speed, nothing special but the fact that it is my first mustang. I am a former import guru....no more. I've never run it except on the street, it has new wheels & tires, new exaust, and that about covers it. Looking to change a lot in the future including engine. Any ideas are appreciated. |
Are you guys serious???
A car length by 100 mph?? Well, if it's true, that had to either have been a 4 banger w/ 5.0 badges or one broke down 5.0. ------------------------------- '79 Mustang Coup 4" Cowl Weld wheels (15x6;15x8) Stock 5.8L C4 w/ shift kit 1.5" MAC full length headers Holley 750 CFM Edelbrock intake 2.5" Off road H-pipe, 2-chamber Flowmasters 8.8" Rear end w/ 3.55 gears (Now that's more like it!!) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif Front: 225/60/15 Rear: 255/60/15 Eagle GT II 14 x 4” K&N air filter (getting the Xtreme setup soon) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/cool.gif "Red, thou art my companion. Hasten now your quickened metamorphosis to Green that I may conquer all who dare abide there beside me. May they be left thither behind burnt black." ---Fox Body |
With gears and full exhaust I was running 15.0-15.1 in my 89vert/aod. Not to take away from the new v-6s but, I'm thinking that 5.0 is tired.
My girlfriend had a 94 v6 firebird(manual) that surprised the heck out of me. It wouldn't out run my 5.0 by any means but it did surprise me. I think it was rated at 200hp or there about. Maybe the newer ones are stronger.. Did anyone else read the recent article where the v6s got together for a day at the track?? They had a v6 firebird that ran 12.8s with a blower... very impressive(to me anyhow). I think that most of the v6 mustangs were in the low 13s. |
If either one of my mustangs EVER and I mean EVER run that poorly then it's going to the junk yard!!
Somebody should have told the kid with the 5.0 to take the emergency brake off!! Either that or it had some major problems like you guys said. ------------------ '82 GT 351W,BBK shorties, Comp Cam,edelbrock intake 625 cfm carter carb. c-4 tranny w/ pro stick shifter. 4 core radiator Mallory distributor. 3:27 ......................... |
A FEW car lengths up to 100 and you PULLED on him after he was ahead of you even though he has 25 more hp and a lot more tq... I'm sorry but the new v6's aren't that strong(even if the 5.0 was running bad), ESPECIALLY with an AUTO, and if your friends 5.0 was "mean sounding" it probably isn't stock which would stack the odds even more in his favor.... sorry don't belive it.... The AOD 5.0's are realtively slow in stock form, but not total dogs.... mine runs low 14's with just a few boltons...
------------------ 92 AOD GT, K&N, ram air, pulleys, 2 ch. flowmasters, 4:10's, shift kit, 1 5/8 mac longtubes and offroad hpipe 14.249 @ 97.34 mph before the headers and hpipe |
I think that the v6, with a few mods, would be able to run with the 5.0. It has surprising power and the 5.0 was an auto. Wasnt there problems witht he auto 5.0L back then?
anyway, i believe it |
V6 hang with a 5.0. come on that statement cannot go uncorrected, modded v6 or not.
My bone stock 5.0 '88 notch ran 14.8 at 97mph. What does the v6 run 10mph slower - thats all day. Sorry to be harsh but lets cut the bs on the 5.0, i see it everywhere. |
I'm not saying I can beat any stock 5.0 L out there, I love the 5.0 L engine. and sure, a lot of 5.0s were really fast, but for a few select years ford messed up and they werent any faster than today's v6s. Just accept it, there was nothing wrong with this 5.0. WHy dont you look up the stats on both cars and you'll see that i am telling the truth.
POST ANY STATS REGARDING THIS TOPIC IN HERE, AND TELL WHERE YOU GOT THEM |
mmike, with or without mods the 5.0 would beat the v6? ya right...when i get a few more bolt ons (pulleys, cai, 3.73s w/ t-lok, shiftkit) i will piss on this 87 gt...all day. let's cut through the bullshit for real.
|
Hey 2000 silver auto, Do you want to try and piss on a 5.8 mustang?
Sorry, I have always said "A mustang isn't a mustang unless there is a V-8 in it!! If I thought for one second I could go fast with a V-6 mustang then I would have one in my driveway by now. I am a happy owner of two mustangs. One with a 5.0 and the other with a worked 5.8 V-6 mustangs...how can I say it nicely...... THEY SUCK!!! So yes, let's cut through the BS!!! ------------------ '82 GT 351W,BBK shorties, Comp Cam,edelbrock intake 625 cfm carter carb. c-4 tranny w/ pro stick shifter. 4 core radiator Mallory distributor. 3:27 ......................... |
Hey 2000 silver auto, Do you want to try and piss on a 5.8 mustang?
Sorry, I have always said "A mustang isn't a mustang unless there is a V-8 in it!! If I thought for one second I could go fast with a V-6 mustang then I would have one in my driveway by now. I am a happy owner of two mustangs. One with a 5.0 and the other with a worked 5.8 V-6 mustangs...how can I say it nicely...... THEY SUCK!!! So yes, let's cut through the BS!!! ------------------ '82 GT 351W,BBK shorties, Comp Cam,edelbrock intake 625 cfm carter carb. c-4 tranny w/ pro stick shifter. 4 core radiator Mallory distributor. 3:27 ......................... |
The new V6's are suprisingly powerful, i've driven a few and they're surprisingly torquey engines. I can easily believe that your car beat his, but if it were new car vs. new car he would've probably smoked you pretty good, IMHO. You never know how worn his cam is, how much carbon is built up in his heads, how coated with crap the oxygen sensor is, etc. Good kill! That's the first V6 to 5.0 kill that i've ever heard.
------------------ '84 Mustang 5.0 T5, FMS aluminum radiator & 180* thermostat, 1 5/8 shortys/2.5" duals, '88 GT tail lights and wheels, Holley 4160 4 BBL, smog pump idler, more coming soon |
okay..., the civic si runs a 15.3 1/4, its comparable with the new v6 stangs, i have raced my friends si many time in my 91 gt aod and he cant even get close to keeping up with all the oil smoke coming out my exhaust, im not saying you didnt beat him, im sure it is very possible depening on drivers and condition of the older car, but i will race you title for title in my slow aod. v6 cars are to go to work and back in, not for fun, get real and buy a GT if you wanna have some fun, v6 and v8s are no comparison!
|
2000 Ford Mustang: 4-speed automatic
--Engine: 3.8 liter 12 valve --Horsepower: 190 @ 5250 --Torque: 220 @ 2750 ----Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 8.6 sec. 1/4-mile in 17.0 sec. (16.2 sec. w/ manual) --------http://carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Heraud/Ford/Mustang/2000S.asp That seems about right (even though I could accept an automatic running mid 16s). Not saying you're lying 2000 silver, you may be sincere in what you THINK was a race against decent stock 5.0 Mustang. I don't hate V6s and I don't look down (much) on V6s, but I am one of those skeptics. Yeah, it COULD'VE happened, but it didn't. At least not the way you're describing it. Like I said b4, either that 5.0 had some issues or you got yourself one heck of a monster V6 (Now don't get all huffy and puffy). ------------------------------- '79 Mustang Coup 4" Cowl Weld wheels (15x6;15x8) Stock 5.8L C4 w/ shift kit 1.5" MAC full length headers Holley 750 CFM Edelbrock intake 2.5" Off road H-pipe, 2-chamber Flowmasters 8.8" Rear end w/ 3.55 gears (Now that's more like it!!) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif Front: 225/60/15 Rear: 255/60/15 Eagle GT II 14 x 4” K&N air filter (getting the Xtreme setup soon) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/cool.gif "Red, thou art my companion. Hasten now your quickened metamorphosis to Green that I may conquer all who dare abide there beside me. May they be left thither behind burnt black." ---Fox Body |
The light finally shines... not many people know what this V6 actually does (stock) on the quarter.
Other Story; This eeediot bought a car same colour as mine... but V6!!!! I'm sooooo pissed cuz he parks at my spot at the coffee shop and is such a disgrass to any mustang owner out there. |
As I recall, MM&FF got a 99 V-6 to run a 14.97, stock, with the spare removed, and some whoop *** driving. They said it was easier to the the V-6 into the 14's than the last 4.6L SOHC GT.
The little V-6's can appearently be quite quick, but add an auto to the mix and the 14.97 quickly turns into mid 15's. The catback may give a few hp, benefit (10hp), but that's it. I'd be very suprised if the V-6 auto runs better than a 15.4 with those mods. My uncle just G-teched his bone stock 89 GT convert with the AOD. With bad wheelspin, 0-60 7.1sec, 1/4mile 15.80@93mph. We all know the G-techs trap high, and the wheelspin hurt him, he got a 6.7 later, no 1/4 time, but their ET's are really quite accurate. My uncles car has a little over 50k on it. Probably could use a tune, and he cut 4/10 in his next 0-60 which probably would have put him in the low 15's, but still, a 15.80 was the first run. I'm really disappointed in the times it ran, but can't dispute them. A solid running V-6 would have taken it. As far as all this ricer CAI (I hate that abbreviation looks like a wacked ricer ignition company) bullfluff talk, shove it, cause most 5.0's will hand you your *** even with all those mods. I'm sure my 87 would be showing you taillights with those mods and a 75 shot. All my 87 has is exhaust and cold air. Judging by the competition I've beaten with it, it's a real high 13 real low 14 car. Did you win, maybe. Do you have some kind of bragging rights over 5.0's. Hell no. |
Oh, and by the way the 1987-1988 5.0's were the quickest production 5.0's until the 1993 Cobra. The older SD cars run better than the MAF cars stock for stock.
|
Ok so now the older 4.6's are slower than the new v6's too? Come on guys get real here. The 5.0 has a 35hp advantage over the v6 and there is NO WAY the catback gave him 10-12hp, a catback is hardly even worth any horsepower on a stock 5.0 or 4.6, MAYBE 5hp and that would be if you did the rest of the exhaust(headers and hpipe too). I agree with fox body, it COULD have happened but not like you are describing it. Oh and the 87-88gt's ARE even faster than the 89-93 in stock form because of the speed density, and as for pissing on a 5.0GT with the mods you listed... I would say it would take at least those mods to have you running even with one(an AOD) and I think a 5spd would still take you.
|
I posted earlier saying it could have happened. I think it is VERY possible this could happen. Did you see what I posted about someone's car that I know, 89 LX hatch, stock motor, built AOD 2200 stall, with 3.55 gears only ran a 15.3 or 15.4? That is pretty sorry. So take away a couple of tenths for the gear and better shifting trans and you are almost at high 15's.
MM&FF got a V-6 stang to run 14's and that is pretty impressive. So high 15's for an automatic is not that far off. BUT, I agree his tone is a little aggressive and defensive. |
Sorry posted in the wrong topic.
------------------ 88GT stock shortblock, GT-40 iron heads, Edlebrock Performer intake, 24# inj, Pro-M 75mm Bullet MAM, 3.73, hurst short throw, F-303, electric fan, alum rad, FMS HD clutch, R134a ac conversion, 70mm TB , and some other stuff I probably forgot, 13.02@106 with a 1.87 60ft [This message has been edited by 88GT5.013.02 (edited 03-22-2001).] |
V6 guys, I'm not saying your story isnt true. But bring on the v6's i'll race you anytime. But seriously, a 5sp 5.0 will run mid 14's at 96-98mph what are your times.
True the autos arnt as fast, i just think the statement about v6 taking 5.0 is way off. Not trying to piss anyone off, BTW good kill. |
http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif This thread is funny http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif
------------------ 90 Honda CRX aka Project Mongoose 84 Toyota Supra aka Natural Born Killa |
Ahh...I remember when me and a few members of this board where "discussing" the newer V6 Mustangs and they were telling me how they would beat a stock Civic Si which runs high 15's. I guess they were wrong. Thanks guys for pointing that out. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif
------------------ 90 Honda CRX aka Project Mongoose 84 Toyota Supra aka Natural Born Killa |
all right, i was a little agressive, but because you guys jumped all over my story. whoever posted that BULLSHIT post about 0-60 in 8.6, why dont you look on msn for the gt stats, it says it does 0-60 in 6.7!! THIS INFORMATION SAYS IT IS FOR 99 + MUSTANGS, BUT IN REALITY IS FOR 94-98!!! MUCH SLOWER!!! All realiable sources (i.e. Motortrend, post a 0-60 7.1 on the v6, which definitely COULD beat some of the 5.0s, this cant be disputed. the numbers are there. sure, certain cars are faster/slower, like this guy with the 91 gt, ya, that would win. but there is another guy that says even with the gears,etc. he was still running something compareable to the v6.
and by the way, all of my claims, if you notice, were not against all 5.0s, because obviously many/most would beat me. it was against the ONE 87 gt aod that i raced. finally, everyone else except 82gt disregard this message: v6 mustangs suck?? all right, then why did i beat that 5.0?? go back to your garage and continue jerking off to your piece of **** car...bye |
here is what msn says...it is obviously wrong, so disregard the douche bag that posted the original information about the v6. Here is the 4.6 info (i suspect they carried the information from pre 99 mustang to this, not knowing that specs changed)
Mustang : 4-speed automatic Engine: 4.6 liter 16 valve Horsepower: 260 @ 5250 Torque: 302 @ 4000 Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.2 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.0 sec. Top Speed: 132 mph Braking: 60-0 mph in 132 ft. Road Holding: 0.85 g. Mustang : 5-speed manual Engine: 4.6 liter 16 valve Horsepower: 260 @ 5250 Torque: 302 @ 4000 Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 6.4 sec. 1/4-mile in 14.6 sec. Top Speed: 136 mph Braking: 60-0 mph in 131 ft. Road Holding: 0.85 g. Mustang : 5-speed manual Engine: 4.6 liter 32 valve Horsepower: 320 @ 6000 Torque: 317 @ 4750 Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 5.6 sec. 1/4-mile in 13.8 sec. Top Speed: 150 mph Braking: 60-0 mph in 127 ft. Road Holding: 0.90 g. THIS INFORMATION IS ALL WRONG!!! |
HAHAHAHA!
You've crashed your V-6 twice because it was TOO FAST?? Dude, you crashed your car cause you can't drive and you are stupid. Better go get something more your speed like a fox 4banger. Maybe you'll be able to contain the monumental 88hp in the early versions? (Better get some grippy tires for it though LOL) A 7.1sec 0-60 won't beat any 5.0's that I know of. Even my uncles sad spinning 89 GT Convert with the AOD managed a 7.1 to 60 on his first try and a 6.7 after that. A 7.1? If the That's Lincoln Mark VIII territory, I've raced those and I leave them like yesterday's news. An 89 GT Convert AOD is one of the least performance minded 5.0's you can get stock from the factory. |
2000 silver auto V-6, come now don't be crying on this board just because the rest of us see through your little fantasy you made up. Yes, the Ford V-6 IS JUNK!!
If you are going to buy a mustang, then buy a REAL mustang otherwise you may as well have bought a ricer!! B0000 Hooo!! now go run to mommy and daddy and tell them that the big boys are picking on you!! ------------------ '82 GT 351W,BBK shorties, Comp Cam,edelbrock intake 625 cfm carter carb. c-4 tranny w/ pro stick shifter. 4 core radiator Mallory distributor. 3:27 ......................... |
I think that this post has gotten way out of hand. I myself own a V6 mustang, a 01. They are faster than all you 5.0 owners would expect. If you dont believe it then we will have to all arrange a little get together and run them to find out...
If you dont except the challenge then stop posting your biased remarks, since youve obviously never driven a 99+ V6. |
Hey dude, there is a Small Ponies Forum at MW. Why don't you go there.
Don't come here getting all pissed off cause someone called you on your 5.0 slaughter. Note: I don't hate ppl w/ V6s. But you're a bit over-optimistic. Yeah, that was just ONE Mustang so nice "win". ------------------------------- '79 Mustang Coup 4" Cowl Weld wheels (15x6;15x8) Stock 5.8L C4 w/ shift kit 1.5" MAC full length headers Holley 750 CFM Edelbrock intake 2.5" Off road H-pipe, 2-chamber Flowmasters 8.8" Rear end w/ 3.55 gears (Now that's more like it!!) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif Front: 225/60/15 Rear: 255/60/15 Eagle GT II 14 x 4” K&N air filter (getting the Xtreme setup soon) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/cool.gif "Red, thou art my companion. Hasten now your quickened metamorphosis to Green that I may conquer all who dare abide there beside me. May they be left thither behind burnt black." ---Fox Body |
82 gt (in his garage jacking to his 351 windsor that would get blown off the face of this earth by an ls1 351)-if the v6s are such **** , then i guess some 5.0s are **** since the v6 can keep up with it.
|
fox body-the 79 mustang looks like **** , so stfu
|
The only V6 99+ Stang I respect is the Kenny Brown one, and even the then he should not be modifying a V6.
I guess there are enough posers out there to justify that market move. I mean, look at Steeda, Saleen, SVT, Ford Racing, ... they don't show off any 6 banger Stangs. If you ask me Kenny Brown is a smart business man... , on other hand, it must suck to mod a V6 Stang. |
Hey, I am up for a challenge!!! I like those!! The only problem is that I am in Pa. and you are in NJ.
I know I am going to the Carlisle car show sometime in April. How about you? Maybe we can meet up there. I am dead serious. If you lived in my area I would be knocking at your door right about now and asking you to run your 'stang. Seriously dude, I DO WANT TO RUN YOUR STANG!! Any Ford V-6 for that matter. I know chevy and the imports make some nasty V-6's so I would hesitate on some of those, but Fords V-6 do not scare me. I love Fords and their mustangs but I am not impressed with the V-6 Sorry Do you want to run my '88 5.0 or my '82 GT with a 351W? Take your pick. I would suggest you opt for the '88 though to have a chance at this. Let me know how you want to meet up. ------------------ '82 GT 351W,BBK shorties, Comp Cam,edelbrock intake 625 cfm carter carb. c-4 tranny w/ pro stick shifter. 4 core radiator Mallory distributor. 3:27 ......................... |
Quote:
So maybe us 5.0 owners don't give the v6 enough credit, but they aren't that fast. The 5.0 you beat must have been in bad shape, really bad. Next time you race him, make sure all the spark plugs are connected. ------------------ ABit KT7, T-Bird 900@1100, PAL6035-2, 256M pc133, 20gb@7200rpm, MP7040A, PC-DVD 6x, Viper V770, SB Live |
I think 2000 auto V-6 and V-6 Bandit are the same people. You are from the same place and registered at the same time..... hmmmmmmm
Anyone else notice this little scheme? Either that or you are BIG BROTHER coming to the aid of LITTLE BROTHER. Now which is it?? ------------------ '82 GT 351W,BBK shorties, Comp Cam,edelbrock intake 625 cfm carter carb. c-4 tranny w/ pro stick shifter. 4 core radiator Mallory distributor. 3:27 ......................... |
i have it all figured out now, this silver auto v6 guy is a fag, he seems to like to talk about other guys jerking off over there cars, i guess he likes to go to have circle jerk with the phucking ricers since they all think the smaller smaller your motor the faster you can go, get real !!!!
|
Hey 2000 Silver,
Thanks for the compliments. Your opinion of my car means a lot to me. Thanks again. Oh, I didn't know you had an LS1 Camaro. Cool. Oh, wait a minute, you don't have one.... Well, my brother's girlfriend's mom has a friend who has a dog who's owner's son had a '98 V6 Firebird who could've smoked your V6 before it got wrecked. ------------------------------- '79 Mustang Coup 4" Cowl Weld wheels (15x6;15x8) Stock 5.8L C4 w/ shift kit 1.5" MAC full length headers Holley 750 CFM Edelbrock intake 2.5" Off road H-pipe, 2-chamber Flowmasters 8.8" Rear end w/ 3.55 gears (Now that's more like it!!) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif Front: 225/60/15 Rear: 255/60/15 Eagle GT II 14 x 4” K&N air filter (getting the Xtreme setup soon) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/cool.gif "Red, thou art my companion. Hasten now your quickened metamorphosis to Green that I may conquer all who dare abide there beside me. May they be left thither behind burnt black." ---Fox Body |
Thanks Dinomite and White 5.0L for helping out here. A stock V-6 beating a 5.0...(LOL)
Where do these people come up with these stories? This 2000 auto fag should write books with his imagiantion instead of writing silly post like this one. I wouldn't lose any sleep if this thread got closed because it is getting a little silly. What the HELL am I saying!!!!!! This is FUN!!!!!!!!!!!!! ------------------ '82 GT 351W,BBK shorties, Comp Cam,edelbrock intake 625 cfm carter carb. c-4 tranny w/ pro stick shifter. 4 core radiator Mallory distributor. 3:27 ......................... |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 AM. |