Threaded Mode
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
04-18-2001, 08:09 AM
|
#21 |
|
or '331 LX Eric'
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
|
One other thing to consider is that depending upon head and cam combination his effective rpm range could have easily moved up a notch. For example - when my coupe was stock, it had much more torque down low, but seemed to die out pretty quick past 4800 or so. Now, with my TW heads and cam, I lost alot of the low end torque, but my horsepower curve really kicks in over 3000, and all the way to 5800 (as evidenced on my last dyno session graph).
So, it's possible that he could have pulled away at higher rpms. Just an idea. E ------------------ 1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 38,000 miles 13.17 @ 106.14 mph w/ 2.138 60' |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Please Help!! - 4.6L Prob.s | 98gt5sp | Modular Madness | 2 | 07-09-2002 08:57 AM |
| 5.0L vs 4.6L comparison | tchm | Windsor Power | 3 | 07-22-2001 09:07 PM |
| New 4.6L Tbird, parts? | 91LX2Bfast | Modular Madness | 0 | 10-11-2000 03:54 PM |
| Installing a 4.6L inna 62 Falcon Futura | 62falcon/4.6LCobraConver | Classic Mustangs | 0 | 05-20-1999 06:58 PM |
| Installing a 4.6L in a 62 Falcon Futura | 62falcon/4.6LCobraConver | Small Ponies | 0 | 05-20-1999 06:50 PM |