© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
08-17-2001, 01:20 PM | #19 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Dayton, MN USA
Posts: 4
|
Here's why a Mustang Dyno is more accurate in simulating track conditions than a DynoJet. First, lets all agree on one thing. The rate at which an engine increases RPM DOES matter to tuning (an engine increasing 1000 RPM/sec sees completely different fuel and air demands than an engine increasing at 200 RPM/sec).
That said, the Dynojet uses a fixed weight drum. With the same amount of RWHP, it will accelerate at the same speed regarless of whether you have a 1000# rail or at 5000# heavy street car sitting on it. The dynojet would have you put the same tune on either engine. However, in real life, the RPMs on the 1000# rail increase way faster than the 5000# street car. The rail needs a different tune than the street car. Now on a Mustang Dyno, the rate of acceleration is controlled by the weight of the vehicle (and perhaps wind speed, I don't know). This will result in a tune that is tailored to the actual RPM increase rate vs an increase rate that is seen when on the dyno. -Mike ------------------ |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stingy Dyno? | SleeperGT | Modular Madness | 4 | 10-22-2003 01:42 PM |
What is Mustang 1750 dyno? | Mike_W | Windsor Power | 2 | 07-13-2001 09:57 AM |
Dynojet or Mustang Dyno? | Noongs94GT | Windsor Power | 2 | 01-22-2001 08:02 PM |
Dyno Don '66 Mustang photos? | jibusuki | Classic Mustangs | 4 | 08-13-2000 06:41 PM |