

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Marysville, Wa., USA
Posts: 8
|
![]() Which is better? I've got access to both in my area. We've heard good and bad about both but is there a more true one ar more correct? I just want to get on and tuned properly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Marysville, Wa., USA
Posts: 8
|
![]() I'm guessing noones got an opinion?
------------------ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Utica, Michigan
Posts: 2,631
|
![]() The Mustang dyno is more accurate, but the Dynojet will give you more "impressive" numbers.
I know the Mustang dyno is a newer, improved design, but I am not exactly sure why. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
disapionted with dyno numbers | 302crew | Windsor Power | 7 | 08-13-2003 10:22 AM |
My latest dyno adventures | XR1stang | Blue Oval Lounge | 6 | 08-01-2003 04:00 PM |
Mustang Club of Central Iowa Autocross - May 6 - Marshalltown Go-Kart Track | KB1991 | Corner Carvers Delight | 0 | 05-03-2001 12:32 PM |