|
Must've been a 4 cyl mustang
http://www.houston-imports.com/10sec.html
...Or a V8 Civic... Lets see what your excuses are... bad launch full out race civic stock mustang I would still rather have a mustang a rocket powered turd is still a turd let me know if you have anymore http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif ------------------ 92 honda civic 10.987 @ 131.5 full interior and street driven |
You oughta put my asbestos suit on now....cuz the flames are going to come down....I should know.
|
What are you doing st00pid? People here are not interested in bashing you. A 10 second street driven civic is very impressive, even to domestic owners. We here at stang works are automobile enthusiests, not import hating red necks. If someone can build a car like that and still be a nice guy and respect other drivers, even thought thier cars might be slower, then that guy/girl is ok in our book. I liked the video, and i'm sure i'd like your car in person. Not all import drivers are ricers. Don't come here trying to rub it in our faces and you won't get flamed. We have several import drivers here that are productive members of a great site. If you'd like to hang around and play nice, you'll find that you won't get a warmer welcome and more support any where. Not even on other import sites. Thanks for the video. Hope to see you around, being hospitible of course. Light Em Up! http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif
|
Hey stupid, ur uh st00pid. Have you come here to antagonize us or have you come here to just talk about respectable cars? If it's the latter reason (I hope), then WELCOME ABOARD, if not well, I'm sure you can figure it out.
BTW, my sentiments are similar to NoSlow5.0's. Just b/c this is a Mustang board doesn't mean we don't want import drivers here. What we don't want here, however, are "ricers." Peace. ------------------------------- '79 Mustang Coup 4" Cowl Weld wheels (15x6;15x8) Stock 5.8L C4 w/ shift kit 1.5" MAC full length headers Holley 750 CFM Edelbrock intake 2.5" Off road H-pipe, 2-chamber Flowmasters 8.8" Rear end w/ 3.55 gears (Now that's more like it!!) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif Front: 225/60/15 Rear: 255/60/15 Eagle GT II 14 x 4” K&N air filter (getting the Xtreme setup soon) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/cool.gif "Red, thou art my companion. Hasten now your quickened metamorphosis to Green that I may conquer all who dare abide there beside me. May they be left thither behind burnt black." ---Fox Body |
Actually it seems that no matter where I post that even on an import board, There is ALWAYS someone making an excuse of why I beat them instead of just accepting the fact the my car make a ridiculous amount of Hp for a 4 cyl and its a fast car.. I appreciate your intelligence.
------------------ 92 honda civic 10.987 @ 131.5 full interior and street driven |
Quote:
------------------ "I know you don't really wanna, unleash the dragon..." Sisqo |
tisk tisk tisk. How can a person with the knowlege to built such a quick honda be so arrogant.
------------------ 67'fastback- Edelbrock carb, intake, cam, valve springs. Road lifters, Comp Cam rocker arms, windage tray, cerama coated headers, dual flows with H-pipe, modded c-4, tci stall converter, perma cool electric fan, aluminum water pump, griffen aluminum radiator, accel 8.8 cable, wide cap distriburator, magnetic pick up, manley valves, v-matic hurst shifter, edelbrock performer nitrous, carter electric fuel pump, ignitor coil, solid motor mounts, magna racing suspension, poly urathane bushings, und |
lets see topic is " must have been a 4 cyl mustang" then first line is "or a v-8 civic" then you say " lets see what your excuses are"
looks like you are trolling for a flame party now! maybe it's the way you word it that bring the excuses. instead of gloating that you beat a mustang just post about your times that u run, might get a better responce. ------------------ 93-LX: 5 Speed, Flow's with H-Pipe, 3.73's Sub's and K&N. |
Jason (stOOpid),
Cars are just nuts and bolts, period. From the factory is one thing, modifying them is another. It appears from your mods and the picture that your car is very nice and runs extremely well. If YOU did the work yourself, I applaud what appears (said only because I have not seen it up close) a quality job. If you PAID for it then great, but anyone can write a check. But lets face it, your car is more of a contraption than a car. "shett metal oil pan", "sheet metal intake", "24 psi boost", etc.... Know this, it takes a hell of a lot less mods to get a V8 car (even a heavy one) into the 10's. Nice job, but come on. |
Ive built several mustangs the slowest one was a stock motored 95 cobra with a turbo at 9 psi, went high 11's work on team KFC with mark harwell to go 8.50 @ 160. My civic is Just as you would get it from the factory except that I turboed it to make around 480hp. Any one can make a fast RWD V8 car, but a fast FWD 4 cyl with full interior and a jammin stereo, thats a challenge. After reading the posts where some guy posted my civic and a viper racing and there were a lot of flames.. I figured Id see what kind of flames you guys would give me. But I was suprised to see that there are some intelligent life on this board.
------------------ 92 honda civic 10.987 @ 131.5 full interior and street driven |
It seems like so many of the import guys who come here have such a chip on their shoulder. As has been said before, we here at Mustangworks applaud anyone who can build a fast A$$ car. If you want to do it in a Honda, then so be it. It really doesn't matter to most of us. I bought a Mustang cause I don't have enough money to start out in such a performance hole, as I would have been in if I bought say, an Si, or an Integra. Bottom line is, I love my stang, you love your import. No one is trying to say that Hondas suck, its just that this is a MUSTANG site, so obviously, the talk will relate mostly to stangs. But, if youre here to stay, welcome.
------------------ Black 2000 GT Magnaflow Catback, K&N |
I too chose a car to modify that I could afford, But my friends have cars that would blow my civic away, and still do.It gives me something to work for. Someday I hope to be able to keep up with them in the civic, but Im also working on a 92 mustang, built stock block with a YS trim. I dont keep up with either side too much.. Im just trying to go as fast as possible.
------------------ 92 honda civic 10.987 @ 131.5 full interior and street driven |
Nice job ! Still looks civil and kicks *** . Do you have any pics of the engine, I would love to see the work you have done. I do have one small question: HOW THE HELL DO YOU DRIVE IT? I couldn't imagine that power to weight ratio in a FWD car. I bet you piss off a lot of the Vette/Viper crowd, they seem to take it the hardest. One of friends had a PINK turbo'd bug that ran in the 9's, it REALLY pisses people off when it smokes them.
------------------ 347, 279/284 .493/.510, TFS TW, Stealth, 750, Flowtech hdrs, Dr. Gas X, 2 Chmbr Flowmaster, MSD 6AL-Dist.& SS coil, Art Carr C-4, Currie 9" w/3.55, alum Drv Shft, susp mods, 4 wheel power disc In a 66 coupe |
Hmmmmm.... Time for me to chime in.
I've got to direct a question at inferno, since I actually trust most of what comes out of his mouth. Do you really think a stock '92 Civic with just a turbo can do what this guy claims? I believe you posted previously that the Civic's axles could handle 400hp, but the tranny couldn't. I also think slapping only a wild *** turbo onto a '92 Civic would more likely lead to 250hp max and at best 13's without other engine work. Also, seems like your car is supposed to trap in the 120's with only 350hp, how is he getting low 130's with another 130hp? Just like it came from the factory with a turbo is BS in my opinion. That thing would have to be running an ungodly amount of boost. I'm calling BS on the factory Civic making 480hp without extensive mods, and a different engine altogether. |
Well he did say he had a 1.8L GSR engine.
|
<-- (Stands behind unit with his arms crossed and a frown awaiting answers to the questions and infernos responce. )
------------------ -1989 Saleen Mustang #406-TFS Heads, E-303 Cam, Edelbrock Intake, and more. Added Eibach drag launch springs and 70/30's w/ 50/50's. 0-110MPH In car view (963k) All Throttle through 3 gears! (497k) <A HREF="http://members.aol.com/lskymanl/burnout.mpg" TARGET=_b |
Just checking - Is this a real time video? Putting a stop watch on it from launch to the flash of the win light comming on is around 12.5 seconds. This thing does haul a** though.
|
is that a 1\4 or 1\8?? no flame i just dont know.
|
Quote:
Quote:
If he's ripping off 131mph in the 1/8 I'll trade my Mustang for a Corolla, Z28EATR |
i trade my stang for one to, but i only saw where he claimed to have run 10's at 130's the video i watched didnt show trap time, at least i didnt think it did.
|
It seems one active topic disapeared from yesterday... Remember KewKewKew and his post about Hondas handing there asz to Stangs or something like that... twilight zone.
Anyways in there he was saying that the engine was a GSR 1.8L VTEC. |
here is the same car but i cant really tell what his time is http://www.houston-imports.com/vsalbert.html
|
Cool, sorry Lizard King I wasn't looking in other posts. Well hell... Then is it stock of the floor with a turbo, or is it a GSR motor and tranny? Plus even a GSR motor is going to need extensive modification beyond a bolt on turbo to make anywhere near 480hp.
I'm calling TROLL based on inconsistancies in his BS. If you wish to prove me wrong stOOpid make a complete mod list. It had better be reasonable, cause we will find out if you know your **** . Plus even a GSR motor is going to need extensive modification beyond a bolt on turbo to make anywhere near 480hp. |
Just to let everyone know, you can go to his site on Houston Imports to read his mods, that's what I did. It definately aint stock, but looks like a quality job. From his mod list it appears he's put a lot of work into it.
------------------ 347, 279/284 .493/.510, TFS TW, Stealth, 750, Flowtech hdrs, Dr. Gas X, 2 Chmbr Flowmaster, MSD 6AL-Dist.& SS coil, Art Carr C-4, Currie 9" w/3.55, alum Drv Shft, susp mods, 4 wheel power disc In a 66 coupe |
I actually downloaded that video with this ******* 33.6 modem. That's how bad I wanted to see some sort of validity to this. The video didn't show the time well enough for me either.
What was that car in the first lane? Looked like a first Gen RX-7? The fastest RX-7 in the world has barely cracked the 9's. That Civic got slaughtered and that was no 9sec RX-7. I'm calling total BS. The video appeared to be sped up, not realtime, and it still took a full 13 sec for the Civic to cross the line. If you look at the 131mph claimed trap speed and the 10.987 time, that would have suggested serious traction issues, there is no device to enhance the pathetic FWD cars traction, also the tires do not appear to be sticking way the hell out of his fenderwells. Having no traction devices and what appears to be stock tire size would say that if he was running very high 10's@131mph, he'd be having traction problems, not bogging problems (or just lack of low end) as was the case here. The Civic just got raped out of the hole by the silver unidentified vehicle (Gen I RX-7?). All in all, there best be some serious explaination here. |
I will be out at Rivercity Raceway near San Antonio this weekend, March 18. Unit 5302, you need to climb out from under the rock in the backwoods where you have been hiding.. There are FWD cars running low 9s and one car that went 8.58 @ over 170. My car is a street car. I have all of the interior in it and a nice stereo. So Im ONLY running a high 10. Should'nt be that hard for you to understand.
In one of the vids on that site I went 11.022, on another I went 11.4. hopefully this weekend Ill be able to hit a mid 10 at around 135. Go ahead and call BS.. it makes you look really stoopid and ignorant. ------------------ 92 honda civic 10.987 @ 131.5 full interior and street driven |
• stock bore
• stock stroke • stock crank • aftermarket rods and pistons • CR: 9.5:1 • resleeved • sheet metal oil pan • stock oil squirters • ported head • stainless steel valves • upgraded springs • civic type r cams • adjustable cam gears • sheet metal intake manifold • overbored GSR TB • external fuel system with 1000hp pump and regulator • 850cc injectors • # 8 steel braided line • upgraded fuel rail • custom stainless steel manifold • 40mm wastegate • 60-1 turbo • custom 3" downpipe • prorammable engine management • electronic boost controller with remote switch • fully adjustable coilover suspension • 16" wheels and tires • 6 pt roll cage • EGT, Boost, oil pressure, fuel pressure, 10Krpm Tach, water temp • CD player and 1150 watt amp 10in sub and 6 mids and highs • big front mount intercooler 2.5in inlet and out • approximately: 480hp, 340tq • 24psi boost There is his mod list from www.houston-imports.com. I don't recall the Civic running right off the factory floor with a GSR motor? Or a bunch of sheetmetal crap, cams, headwork, and aftermarket rods and pistons. Although I doubt the GSR crank/block could handle 480hp made with a 9.5:1 with 24lb boost. I'm assuming the tranny is from a GSR too, although the mod list doesn't list a GSR motor in it at all? It lists stock bore/stroke, which would indicate to me it's a Civic motor, a 92 Civic motor without V-Tech no less. Basically, 480hp should be much better than ultra high 10's on a 2200lb go-kart with a trunk. |
If I need to crawl out from under a rock, you need to drop out of the clouds, stOOpid.
You seem like all rice to me, you just can't answer a straight question can you? No matter how many questions pop up, and no matter how many inconsistencies I find in your statements, you simply cannot address a single on of them. In fact I had to take time out of my day and attempt to figure out what part of your story, if not all of it, was BS. I downloaded both video's, neither displayed a readable time, in the second you got cleaned up by what appears to be a first Gen RX-7. Pathetic, really. I haven't heard of any Gen I RX-7's that run 10's, in fact like I pointed out, the fastest RX-7 in the world runs 9's, and that was not it. BTW, the RX-7 is also RWD just so you know to add that to your wealth of knowledge to call upon at a later date that suits you. Furthermore, why is it every ricers NEED to point out that there are fast FWD cars somewhere? It's like a stock Civic Si owner coming on here tooting his horn about how he cleaned up a Mustang Cobra because his buddy's, buddy's, brother's, uncle's, daughter's, boyfriend said he saw a Civic Si run a 13.0 one time. You could have simply not lied and said your car was a stock with a turbo, (maybe it is and you're full of **** , which I think you are but in another way) or you could have addressed the questions presented to you. Instead you've decided to call me "stoopid" (which is actually spelled stupid, you really should at least spell your own catch phrase correctly) and babble on about rocks and some wigged out, drag slicked, hollow shell of a FWD car that can run 8's. Yes, yes, that's all fine and good, but there are RWD Mustang's running 6's at 200! So yea! I'm soooo impressed. When your overboosted Civic shoots the crankshaft through the bottom of that hamster of a motor, give me a call, I'll be happy to drive my Mustang down there and tow your sorry *** back to the junkyard your car came out of. No hard feelings... I realize you're not that smart so I won't hold it against you. |
When I read it and it said a stock out of the factory engine running 10's with just turbo made me think for a while also. But I was in a hurry to to post anything. Time to get out the fishing boots out again cuzz this bs is up to my waist. If you can run 10's with a stock even gsr engine and some turbo I'm about to sell my fastback and get one of those. Therefore I call it bs. I've seen a stock si vtech with a hole lot of turbo bost run MID 13's but that engine went to hell in 6 runs. There is no way a turbo is going to knock 5 seconds off anyones time.
------------------ 67'fastback- Edelbrock carb, intake, cam, valve springs. Road lifters, Comp Cam rocker arms, windage tray, cerama coated headers, dual flows with H-pipe, modded c-4, tci stall converter, perma cool electric fan, aluminum water pump, griffen aluminum radiator, accel 8.8 cable, wide cap distriburator, magnetic pick up, manley valves, v-matic hurst shifter, edelbrock performer nitrous, carter electric fuel pump, ignitor coil, solid motor mounts, magna racing suspension, poly urathane bushings, und |
Inferno: I realy dont like how you refered to me in your first post. If I came off as stubborn or ignorant to you it wasnt my purpose. Im not the kind of person to flame or contest every Honda timeslip. I do remember contesting that a stock U.S. released ITR could hit a 14.6 though. I just dont like people coming to a mustang site with a video of some random guy in a stang getting beat by a Honda and then being an a$$ about it by listing excuses we might say before anyone even has a chance to post. I mean I sure wouldnt get a video of a 6 second Pro 5.0 stang kicking the $hit out of a civic and post it at ClubSI with a rude title and then talk $hit. Its doesnt have any purpose. Maybe make the topic name "My turbo civic VS a stang" or something but not "must've been a 4 cyl stang"
------------------ 95GT B303 cam, 1.7 rockers, 65mm TB, 73mm MAF, milled heads, 355's K&N, off road pipes, pulleys, msd coil, 9mm wires, Tremec 3550, Pro5.0 shifter,10.5 Motorsport clutch, FMS aluminum driveshaft, weld in subframe connectors |
This computer has no sound, so I really haven't addressed that possibility yet. Did you see the way he got creamed by that Gen I RX-7? Maybe it was a 4banger he raced?
Hahahaha! |
This ten second civic also gets 27 miles per gallon.
|
Hey Unit,
If you're talking about that other car on the link Z28EATR posted, that's a Dodge Viper with gobs of traction. Looks like an RT/10 with a hard top. ------------------------------- '79 Mustang Coup 4" Cowl Weld wheels (15x6;15x8) Stock 5.8L C4 w/ shift kit 1.5" MAC full length headers Holley 750 CFM Edelbrock intake 2.5" Off road H-pipe, 2-chamber Flowmasters 8.8" Rear end w/ 3.55 gears (Now that's more like it!!) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif Front: 225/60/15 Rear: 255/60/15 Eagle GT II 14 x 4” K&N air filter (getting the Xtreme setup soon) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/cool.gif "Red, thou art my companion. Hasten now your quickened metamorphosis to Green that I may conquer all who dare abide there beside me. May they be left thither behind burnt black." ---Fox Body |
We'll just settle this.. I will be at the track in San Antonio TX this weekend. According to Unit, My car is a 13 sec car. So I invite ANYONE to come out and see me run. IF I dont run at least a low 11 then Ill come back on here a completely apologize and send Unit a check for $100. And Ill post a video of me apologizing and writing the check. Sound fair to you Unit?
Oh yea... What the hell is your obsession with RX7s?? it was a 99 Viper RT. that ran a 10.6 with a red light. I only went a 11.4. Maybe your rock doesnt have enough room under it to fit a nice computer screen. (No sound either?? -poor thing) ------------------ 92 honda civic 10.987 @ 131.5 full interior and street driven |
Allright, I knew I thought I saw a mopar type grill on the car. It's a bad movie, hard to tell, if that's a Viper your car is running hard.
Yes, no sound does bite royal *** ! If my new box would get here the problem would be fixed already. Don't even pretend to know how bad, cause you don't. NO SOUND BITES *** !!!! My monitor is a 17" trinitron, no problems there. I'm gonna stand by the fact that you came after me, all I wanted was a real mod list. Had you come across with you mod list like I had to hunt down, you would have been received without flaming. Your car isn't anywhere near a stock Civic with a turbo, what got you flamed was misrepresenting what you had. |
I guess we'll be tuning in this weekend for the results. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif
Wish I could be there to see the run. |
DAMN, I wanna see a video guys... DAMN. I'm in Canada, SNOW, you know. I need a video of this sh*t going down.
BTW, did anyone notice that the Kewkewkew topic disapeared from yesterday's posting. Was it getting bad in there? ------------------ Lizard King, Bone Stock; 13.69 at 101MPH • Extreme Burnout •2000GT VS LS1 • Quartermile run •2000GT vs LX Stang |
Ok, I here is what I have to say regarding this subject; Unit, a stock b-series tranny is deep into the 9's(9.21). A stock H series tranny is in the 8's. These are on cars with over 600whp. Also, I am doing less to my car then he has done(at least I plan on doing less....but who knows) and that is why I am only shooting for 350whp. I also don't plan on having to boost more than 15lbs to reach my goal....if I were to turn up the boost(with a 9:1 compression ratio and my mods, I could boost over 20), I could have better HP after tuning(of course I would need bigger injectors...I am only going to get 550cc's). 480 hp is good enough to get his car into the high 9's with the proper suspension work and dropping his weight to around 2,000lbs(his car probably weighs about 2,600lbs). You don't have to believe me if you don't want to, and you don't have to believe him either.
|
Quote:
|
Yea.. my car Dyno'ed 417 to the wheels, SAE corrected. That was on pump gas at 19psi boost. When I ran a 10.9 I was running 24psi on 118 octane.. Any other questions?
------------------ 92 honda civic 10.987 @ 131.5 full interior and street driven |
I'll be tuning in here this weekend to see the results as if it was the last episode of Temptation Island! http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif
------------------ 1997 Cobra (Black on black), C+L 80mm MAF, K+N filter, Pro 5.0 shifter, BBK Springs, Taylor Wires, 2 Chamber Flows, ASP Pulleys, BBK off road H pipe. |
One more thing.. How would anyone with my mod list NOT make 480hp? did you even read it?
------------------ 92 honda civic 10.987 @ 131.5 full interior and street driven |
Like I said, all I was asking was for a mod list.
My question to you inferno was much earlier, before I looked up and posted his mod list. Obviously with some serious modifications (nothing even remotely like what a stock '92 Civic looked like) he's making really good power. I remain steadfast with my original statement, there is no way in hell a "stock" '92 Civic with a turbo is gonna make 480whp, or run 10's or 11's or 12's for that matter. stOOpid came trolling for flames with his first post on the board, all I wanted was a mod list knowing what he claimed was possible with extensive modification (like he appearently has), but not with what he claimed, a stock '92 Civic with a turbo. I didn't get one until I went looking and digging for it. I'll be the first one to admit that I don't know what mods make what kind of power on a 4banger import, but I am comfortable with calling blatent BS. I also don't know what an "A" tranny or a "B" tranny is. Quite frankly, I don't care because they aren't going to be bolted into anything I drive. Can a '92 Civic tranny hold 480hp (4x what it was designed for, and at least 3x the torque load)? I really doubt it. What can I say, with tons of digging it appears stOOpid has a very fast import. I would have liked a straight answer to my original question so I wouldn't have had to dig on my own, but no, I couldn't be furnished with that. If somebody will not stand up and answer a single question about his car, are you really gonna trust his initial outrageous claims? If some newbie stanger were to post here and say he was running 10's with a stock '86 Mustang GT and a supercharger would we call BS? You've been here long enough to know we would, inferno. stOOpid, you haven't, but let me assure you, we would. Like I said in my response earlier, the only reason stOOpid was flamed was for misrepresenting what he had (in a huge way), that and deciding to play with me, which everyone knows is a recipe for Charredtown. Later, Unit 5302 |
Quote:
I don't really know a ton about the FWD import scene. I try to keep my focus on RWD cars, since I hate FWD, I've owned it, I hate it. I too had an import type car. 1991 Ford Escort GT with the Mazda 1.8L DOHC 16v engine. 127hp@6500rpm, and 114lb/ft@4500rpm. It was relatively fun to drive for a shoebox with a hamster in the front. With the exploding 5sp manual I even beat a couple 5.0 V-8 Cougars, and an LT-1 Camaro Z-28 top end (god was he pissed he didn't opt for the Z rated tires hehe). Unfortunately, like the other rice mobiles, it didn't match my 88 Mustang GT for fuel economy on the road. I drive at about 75mph over the road where the stang was bouncing near 30mpg. At that speed the 'Scort could only manage about 26 due to the little weedwacker spinning at a horrid 4000rpms. Anyway, it blew up the tranny (the pin retaining the gears was defective and dropped out), the computer fried (heater core leaked on it), and the fuel system eventually had to be completely hotwired by myself. That was my second experiance with FWD, the first was a MOPAR 91 Shitow, so obviously that wasn't a good experiance either. Thanks, but I'll take my torque for now. |
Unit's shown a great amount of self control here. Fact: st00pid starts off two days ago stating that his "just like the factory built" except turbo'd 92 Civic runs 10's. Fact: The doubter's justifibly appear and respond to his claim. Fact: Despite numerious requests for a mod list, nothing (but flames) are posted. Fact: Unit (not st00pid) has to post the Honda's mod list - the mechanical contents of the list reveal nothing remotely resembling what came on a 92 Civic. Fact: This is probably a very fast Civic who's owner grossly mis-represented what he did to get his car to perform at this level and tries to make the members on this board believe that stock 92 Civic with a turbo can make 480hp. The moral of the story as I see it, is when you make the claim, be ready to back it up with some real facts and figures - remember, there are a lot of members on this board who actually do know their stuff and have been around cars for a long time and treating them like idiots is not a real good game plan. If st00pid had been honest and up front with what he did to his car, not claimed 480hp from his "factory equipped" but turbo'd Civic, and not made the members of this board search to find out what mod's were done to his car (showing it to be far from factory stock), I'm pretty sure the general tone would have been one more of respect for what he was able to do with his car. All he had to do was be honest from the start about the whole deal.
------------------ 1965 K code coupe - numbers matching - restoration ongoing. 1987 LX notch, 5 spd, stock heads (minor porting) and intake, 65mmTB, 3.55's, ram air, pulleys, shorty's, 2.5" exhaust with cats 13.89@100.25 |
Lets just end this arguement right now.....Fact: There was a misunderstanding about what work was done to stOOpid's car. Fact: We all can agree that his car is capable of running those numbers and having that amount of HP now that we know what is done. No need to continue this pointless arguement....nothing will be gained on either side. We all are car enthusiast here and we should congratulate stOOpid on his building of a very fast car. Let us forget the past and move on.
------------------ "I know you don't really wanna, unleash the dragon..." Sisqo |
OK the imports running 9's have tubed frames and no interiors. You say your running a stock chassis with a full interior and you also say that you dont have all of the mods these guys have in essence your stating your missing 120 hp compared to those guys. How is it that you can still pull 10's with less engine and more weight? There is a guy aroudn here that has an integra that runs 11's and I aked him about the chassis his plain answer was it wouldn't take such a beating. Said you were full of it when I told him of your mods and you couldn't even run it on the street because of the rough idle it would have and noise pollution. He hardly ever drives his on the street because of that. That's what one of your fellow ricers told me. Now you tell me can I get $100 bucks also?
------------------ 67'fastback- Edelbrock carb, intake, cam, valve springs. Road lifters, Comp Cam rocker arms, windage tray, cerama coated headers, dual flows with H-pipe, modded c-4, tci stall converter, perma cool electric fan, aluminum water pump, griffen aluminum radiator, accel 8.8 cable, wide cap distriburator, magnetic pick up, manley valves, v-matic hurst shifter, edelbrock performer nitrous, carter electric fuel pump, ignitor coil, solid motor mounts, magna racing suspension, poly urathane bushings, und |
No doubt things were misrepresented here, only for the purpose of causing flame.
Anyways, my question is to inferno about the tranny's. What did my stock 94 integra have in it? Yeah I did beat on it. But with 142hp I busted 3rd gear, how could it hold up to 400? Sky ------------------ -1989 Saleen Mustang #406- TFS Heads, E-303, edelbrock intake,70MM TB, 73mm MAF, off road H, 2 1/4" exhaust, and 4.10's. 332RWHP@5500 351RWTQ@3750 Runs on 87 Octane! |
It seems to me that stOOpid wasn't flaming anyone. Yea, maybe he was lookin for a little rumble at first, but we all do that. But after the first few posts from us (Stang owners) he actually complimented us. Also, He wasn't hiding anything. When you click on his video link it has his name (Jason) and anyone with half a brain could go to the domain and click on the membership, then go to his name. It seems to mew everything was fine until Unit "chimed in", then all the bolt on chronys followed suit. That's when it became ugly.
|
Wow, for a TROLL you're pretty intent on sticking around, 2MFF.
I guess it's all my fault that I didn't initially want to prove his combo for him? Why in the hell should I have to go digging into his combo when he falsely slaps it down on the table? Why don't you hop in your mom's Solara and cruise for some 12yr old boys like you're craving? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM. |