Quote:
Originally posted by Unit 5302
Sedanman, get a clue.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Unit 5302
I like to use crank numbers because they are unaffected by drivetrain issues. If you put an aluminum driveshaft on a car, you're gonna pick up a rwhp or two. Less rotational mass, more efficient driveline, and that equals more hp at the wheels.
|
But who has the ability to measure the hp at the crank, its something you have to live with.
Quote:
Originally posted by Unit 5302
Cobra cam with 1.7's. .479"/.479" 270*/270*
|
Still quite a bit smaller than the E cam.
Quote:
Originally posted by Unit 5302
An LX vert running 12.7@107 with nearly the same setup as Venumus.
|
Where ATCO or a G-Tech?
Quote:
Originally posted by Unit 5302
Jeff Chamber's was making 325rwhp with the stock GT-40 iron heads, E cam, and GT-40 intake in trophy stock trim
|
Right and those trophy stock cars are stock right
Tell me you are not THAT dumb!
Quote:
Originally posted by Unit 5302
I don't care if your combo wouldn't run, Sedanman. If you knew how to tune your car, it would have unless something was wrong with it.
|
Right this from a guy with a stock motor that admits to having not tuned it in 30K miles. My stang traped 105.5 with stock (not roller) 1.6 rockers. On a 156K short block with only 3.55 gears so not tuned my ***.
Quote:
Originally posted by Unit 5302
With 1.7:1 rockers, it has a reputation for performing well. The 1.7's on the E cam make lift a little high. About .530.
|
I would not reccomend 1.7 rockers to anyone let alone a car with a aftermarket cam, I would recommend switching to a E cam and trading or selling your 1.7's for a set of 1.6's. The simple fact that you will get a better valve train geometry makes the switch worth it by it self.