© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
08-22-2003, 02:30 AM | #61 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SanAntonio, Tx
Posts: 957
|
Quote:
I went to a track event 'clash of the titans' last year, bb chevy nos against turboed smallblock fords, outlaw and some pro 5.0 cars dan millen, mike murrillo ect... chevy took that event: turbo stang went 7.1.... chevy nova 6.9 at some insane mph, yes both poweradded motors, but all topend isnt what wins races, lowend torque will not hurt you in this sport |
|
08-22-2003, 07:12 AM | #62 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: noplace
Posts: 19
|
6.70@207 George Ioannou Bullish Motor Sports Solara Pro
That is from a 183 cu in inline six backhalved car. Technology is just as important as size. |
08-22-2003, 10:42 AM | #63 |
Mustang Addict
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,294
|
Low end torque doesn't really matter on a racecar when you launch with the revs at peak power and never use the low end. Bigger motors do make more horsepower by virtue of being larger as well, though.
__________________
Strike down the unroadworthy! 2000 GT Atl. Blue: '03 Cobra motor - 465rwhp/473rwtq, T-56 6-speed, full MM TA/PH & tubular K-member suspension, Saleen body, 17" Torq-Thrust II's, M/T ET Street radials, and lots more '94 Rio Red Cobra: All the bolt-ons, 3.73s |
08-23-2003, 12:36 AM | #64 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
Low end, high end, it's how it's set up, is not? it
I've been trying to avoid this argument, but felt it's time to chime in.
1.) HP is always a function of torque at a given RPM. HP=RPM/5250 X torque. 2.) Low end torque is an advantagage with relatively high gear ratios and heavy weight. Note: both Supras and Mustangs are heavy, 3000 lbs. +. 3.) HP/TQ curves are easily compensated for with correct gear ratios (rear axle and tranny). 4.)The car with the better Hp/weight ratio, and with good gearing and good driviing, and good traction will ALWAYS PREVAIL. Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe Last edited by Rev; 08-23-2003 at 01:08 AM.. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone Drove A Twin Turbo 5.0??? | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Blue Oval Lounge | 9 | 02-06-2002 07:12 AM |
Speed Innovations Twin Turbo Kit Questions??? | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 1 | 07-17-2001 11:07 PM |
00' GT vs. Twin Turbo Supra | 00'BlackSteed | Stang Stories | 6 | 06-22-2001 06:23 PM |
must see!!! twin turbo supra 874RWHP | 88COBRA | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 02-20-2001 07:08 PM |
MSD Boost Timing Master. A Good Thing To Use With A Twin Turbo? | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Windsor Power | 7 | 01-21-2001 06:57 PM |