Quote:
Originally posted by Unit 5302:
Wow, your CRX must run 14's? It appears to be faster than Mustang GT's, which have a huge hp/weight advantage and 10mph more top end.
Your speedo is screwed. I rest my case.
Considering the C5 Vette can only pull off 172mph, 170 seems way high for a C4. More like 160. Still the rating for the 94 LT-1 is 170.
Oh, and the ZR-1 was rated for 170mph
[This message has been edited by Unit 5302 (edited 06-18-2001).]
|
Instead of continuing to argue and talk crap.
Why dont you admit that you were wrong. I said a CRX Si-R can go 145-160 and guess what thanks to lizard you se that it can.
you said no way a CRX with 160hp can go that fast.
With a little tuning you can get 170hp at the flywhel with an CRX Si-R.
Yall were the ones making fun of the CRX Si-R
so now admit it.
you can take your horse power times drag coeficient times lunar alignment and throw all that out the window smart guy.
and as far as my CRX being as fast as a mustang GT no its not and I never said it was
and if my 43sec to peg out the speedo puts my car in the same league with a mustang GT.
Then maybe my speedo is a little off or maybe my friend that was keeping time is on crack.
I dont know I will admit I was wrong now why dont you do the same
You started off saying noway a crx can go 130 cause my escort couldnt.
BUT NOW YOU SEE.
Keep in mind that a CRX Si-R is lower geared than a Si.
Maybe my speedo is screwed but all the same
you were wrong about the Si-R.
I REST MY CASE
------------------
88 mustang gt convertible bored to 306 BBk equal length headers mac cold air fender kit cowl hood nitto drag radials ford racing clutch flow masters h-pipe 160* thermostat 16 degrees of timing electric fan off 94' t-bird jacobs electronics cap and wires. Edelbrock 1 1/2 inch drop springs.
best 60 ft 2.14, best 1/8th 9.65, best 1/4 15.2 @89mph, Stock gears and 3000+ Altitude
[This message has been edited by 5.0 HO (edited 06-18-2001).]
[This message has been edited by 5.0 HO (edited 06-18-2001).]