

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#13 |
Mustangs
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,938
|
![]() As mentioned the higher the octane you run the more timing you need to burn it. Higher octanes are slower burning but when you advance your timing it burns longer leading to a more complete burn. With correct timing there are less byproducts and more power available. If you don't advance your timing it won't burn as completely and will leave gas in the cylinders that will help wash down the cylinders, dilute the oil and cause sludge build up in the engine. It won't affect your car immediately but 80k down the line you'll have lots of gunk and crusties in your engine.
If you want flat out performance run the octane you can afford and adjust your timing up until it pings or you can feel that you're losing power and back off a degree or two. Just my opinion.
__________________
2005 Suzuki Hayabusa GSX1300-R 1980 Ford Thunderbird - 255 V8 ported heads, 5.0L ported stock headers, O.R. H-pipe and Flowmaster 2-chambers, dual roller timing chain hi-po Mack Truck hood emblem ![]() 1985 Mustang GT 5.0L T5, F-303, GT40p, headers, off-road h, flowmasters, MSD stuff, etc. Sold 02/06/04 ![]() 1989 Mustang GT ET: 13.304@102.29 mph (5-24-03) Sold - 1998 Mustang Cobra coupe, 1/4 mile - street tires: 13.843@103.41 (bone stock) |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another tire question | 96Saleen | Modular Madness | 6 | 02-10-2004 05:27 PM |
A stupid question I hate asking about exhaust sound | jwboner | Windsor Power | 4 | 08-05-2003 05:55 PM |
simple question | Lonzo | Classic Mustangs | 3 | 09-10-2002 09:37 AM |
Question about 2002 Ford Mustang Cd Deck | nissanNICK | Windsor Power | 0 | 03-07-2002 10:08 PM |
Newby here, I have a question on Odometers | mustangmama | Blue Oval Lounge | 3 | 03-03-2001 06:43 AM |