|
Top speed run. Can this be right?
After leaving the Woodward cruise I smoked this LS1 SS on the E-way pretty easily. Then fellow board member FastGTragtop appeared out of nowhere behind us and stepped up to knock him out of the park as well.
Now here is the kicker. I pulled to the outside lane and let those guys start racing from behind me. They came whipping by and I sprayed it in 4th, then into 5th and held it to the mat. I ran 5th gear up to about 5400-5500 rpm. A tad below my shiftlight. My brakes felt as if they went out. When I slowed down I could smell major burning pads. I figured I was hauling balls, until I plugged my numbers into the analyzer. 5400 rpm in 5th gear on a T-5 car with 28" tires comes out to be about 175 mph!!!!! Can that be right? If it is, I am indeed the STUPIDEST MORAN A$$WIPE on the planet for pulling that move. Drag springs, 90/10's, and skinnies. Freakin' retard! ------------------ 1988 Mustang GT 11.8 @ 123 (7/14/01) 1992 BadAzz Wrangler 1993 Explorer |
With your power, I would believe it. What's your axle ratio again?
Rev ------------------ '66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph 1/4 mi. |
YEE-F*CKING-HAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wow, i think i can believe it. you sure you were in 5th gear?
|
Man you are crazy.
I bet that you were going 175mph on the juice. You have bigger balls than me my friend............ http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif ------------------ 88 mustang gt convertible bored to 306 BBk equal length headers mac cold air fender kit 3.73 FMS gears cowl hood nitto drag radials ford racing clutch flow masters h-pipe 160* thermostat 16 degrees of timing electric fan off 94' t-bird jacobs electronics cap and wires. Edelbrock 1 1/2 inch drop springs. |
I doubt it...the faster you go, the more HP it takes to overcome wind resistance..the resistance at 175 is WAY higher than even 150.. you'd probably pull a higher MPH in 4th than 5th really, you loose torque multiplication in 5th gear..
cant remember the formula off hand... ------------------ 84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer 3.55's, underdrives BBK shorties stock cam, 1.7's 13.85@102.5 and a '68 stang that WAS nasty ;-) |
Heck yeah...I believe it. Try the car acceleration program on here. I plugged my numbers in to it to see what my top speed would be. Given my car specs, and aerodynamics, gear ratio, it said I should hit 181. You have a few more mph in the 1/4 than me, so I don't doubt it at all.
------------------ Dustin 89 Saleen GT Sport,428 rwhp,TFS Street Heat Intake,TFS TW Heads,TFS #2 cam,BD-11A 9 psi,Crane 1.6 rr's,BBK 70mm TB,Pro-M 80mm MAF,MSD 6BTM, FMS 9mm wires,BBK longtubes,BBK Short H-pipe,American Thunder cat back,3.55's 12.3@119 street tires 11.496@121.08slicks |
did u remember to calculate wind resistance and resistance from your tires onto the road in the equation? that 175 mph is probobly the speed ur tires would spin at if u lifted the back end off the ground and reved to that rpm in that gear. how much hp do u have? it is possible but unlikely unless u have like 500+ hp
|
I have 3.73's and I was in 5th gear. I am not exactly sure how much power I am making, but I trapped 123 mph last time out with a stinky slipping clutch. At a 3000 lb race weight it should take about 400-420 rwhp to turn that mph. I guess that comes to approximately 500 crank horsepower, or 180 hp at the wheels on a Mustang Dyno. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif (funny if you read the thread....)
It also did not seem to take too long to get up there either. Hard to judge though when you are all adrenalized in the middle of it. |
Quote:
exgmguy 5400 RPM in is what you reached but your speedo only reads somewhere lower. Go out and do 1800RPM in 5th. Record the speed. Say 50MPH. You can simply triple the speed and RPM to get 5400RPM and 150MPH. This works only if you remain in the same gear and it also works because there is a linear relationship between speed and RPM in a given gear. This method is FAAAARRRRRRRR more accurate than the calculators. For those of you who like calculators try this: Achieved RPM*Tire/Rim height ----------------------------------------- Rear gear ratio*Tranny ratio for gear*346 Take this number and decrease it by 7.4%. You will also be very close to your top speed but likely a little optimistic still. Any questions class? http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif ------------------ 88 Notch MAC Headers, MAC H-pipe, MAC Pullies, KN, and BM Shifter Best ET: 14.689 Best MPH: 98.54 Best 60': 2.333 |
Rob,
How much did Carl pull him? Did he tell you about his awesome race w/ a 2001 Cobra 'Vert? (I'm waiting for him to get up off his @ss and post it!!) ------------------ Jeff Kane 1990 LX Mustang Coupe |
Very cool. Hard to believe, but I wouldn't doubt it by any means http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif. Must've been a real rush!
------------------ '90 LX 5.0;12K original miles (no sh*&);3.55 gears; March pulleys;Edelbrock Performer Heads;BBK 1 5/8" equal length shorties;MSD 6AL ignition w/ blaster 2 coil;FMS E303 cam;Pro-M 75mm MAF;BBK 70mm TB; Eibach drag-launch spring kit;Southside welded subs;9" K&N cone filter charger;Hurst shifter;Cervini's 3" turbo hood;A/C delete; gutted cats;2 chamber Flomasters;Corbeau racing seats;FMS 30# injectors;JMS chip; Holley 190lb fp;TFS track heat Intake (12.299 @ 113 - 1.78 60') |
Quote:
The formula I used is: RPM / (rear gear * tranny gear)*60*(tire circumference in inches) / 5280 / 12 http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif ------------------ '91 LX Hatch, 17 ROH ZR6's, lowered, 3.73's, offroad H pipe, SN Cobra cat-back, ASP pullies, 14° timing, C&L 76mm MAF, 170A 3G, B&M Ripper on a T5 Best ET: 14.593 @ 94.62 2.292 60' 1991 LX Hatch 5.0L |
WOW 175MPH Cool.
------------------ 14.62@96.9 Engine: Steal Mounts, Under drive pulleys, K&N, Home ported Lower Intake, No power steering, No A/C Drive Train: 3.55, World Class T-5, NOW it is time for Real power STUFF I Have and will put on after I get everthing: Accel DFI:)Mac cold intake, 70MM TB, Valve covers (COOL ONES)255 Fuel pump. Next to get: rocker arms,Cam,TFS Heads,Injectors 26,Holley intake, What might I need??? |
Quote:
Using a calculator is the only way to do it accurately. If exgmguy really wants to know, he can take a tape measure and measure the diameter of his tire. I say this since measuring the height of the tire would be more difficult to do accurately and the size numbers of the tire are probably not correct anymore because they are worn. Assuming that the tachometer is correct (which I do since it is an expensive one that is designed to be accurate), use this formula (It's essentially the same as yours): Achieved RPM X Tire Diameter ----------------------------- Trans Gear Ratio X Axle Gear Ratio X 1056 The 346 in your equation should be a 336 (1056/PI). The 1056 is the number of inches in a mile divided by 60. Also, just for anyone who cares, if you must go by the size on the tire, you can figure tire/rim height in smithbling's equation with this formula: (Aspect Ratio * Width)/1270 + Rim Height Like I said, though, that assumes a tire with no wear. Oh, aspect ratio should not be converted to a percent for this equation to work. That's handled by the 1270 which is just the conversion factor for milimeters to inches multiplied by 50. It's 50 instead of 100 so that you don't have to multiply by two for the top and bottom of tire. I would like to know why you said to decrease the result by 7.4%, smithbling. ------------------ 351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible |
Quote:
------------------ '91 LX Hatch, 17 ROH ZR6's, lowered, 3.73's, offroad H pipe, SN Cobra cat-back, ASP pullies, 14° timing, C&L 76mm MAF, 170A 3G, B&M Ripper on a T5 Best ET: 14.593 @ 94.62 2.292 60' 1991 LX Hatch 5.0L |
They are 275/60/15 BFG Drag Radials that are in like new condition. Not that wear would matter much.
I think BFG's spec on the tire is like 28.4" or something. Red514LX, Carl beat the SS by about 2to 2 1/2 cars at the top. That was with the top down too. The SS had at least exhaust. I assume the other little mods as well. Carls' car scoots. |
Originally Posted By SMithBling
Weight has zero effect on top speed. This means that whether or not the rear tires were lifted from the ground is irrelevant. Based on his calculated top speed at 5400 RPM wind and aerodynamics too are irrelevant. In other words if 5400RPM in 5th=175MPH then when you achieve that you are doing that. exgmguy 5400 RPM in is what you reached but your speedo only reads somewhere lower. Go out and do 1800RPM in 5th. Record the speed. Say 50MPH. You can simply triple the speed and RPM to get 5400RPM and 150MPH. This works only if you remain in the same gear and it also works because there is a linear relationship between speed and RPM in a given gear. This method is FAAAARRRRRRRR more accurate than the calculators. ------------------------------------------ i never said weight mattered, but what does matter is the frictional force between the tires and the ground, which will affect how fast you can go. Also, by calculating the speed at a certain RPM, u can not determine another speed by calculating another RPM, because although that relationship is linear, the wind resistance goes up dramatically when you begin to reach higher speeds, as well as all other forces acting on the car trying to slow it down....jsut my thoughts...im no rocket scientist but i am a mechanical engineer http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/wink.gif although, if u got the power u got the power aint no wind gonna stop you |
96GTfanatic, Your point about extrapolating speed from RPMs is correct if you're simply trying to find top speed without actually sending the RPMs up to 5400. exgmguy, the crazy fool that he is http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif, actually got his RPMs that high but his speedometer was buried. In that case, everything that smithbling said is absolutely correct if the tachometer and speedometer are known to be correct.
------------------ 351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible |
96gtfanatic...
I'm not sure on your statement, "Based on his calculated top speed at 5400 RPM wind and aerodynamics too are irrelevant". Please explain... Aerodynamics and wind resistance have quite an effect on vehicle performance, thus changing performance under different conditions.. ------------------ Black,84 GT,ground effects,shorty headers, 'open' dual exh.,302 HO(no pollution control crap)bored .060,T5,89 ported heads,edelbrock Performer manifold, Edelbrock 2122 cam,600 Holley, high volume oil pump... Some day (3:73 gears & N2O)!!! will this ever end???? |
Wind resistance and friction would cause him to peak out at a lower RPM if that had been the case. If he can reach the RPM, then he's reaching the speed (assuming he's not spinning at 175 mph, LOL, clutch is not slipping, tach and speedo are accurate).
Rev ------------------ '66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph 1/4 mi. [This message has been edited by Rev (edited 08-22-2001).] |
The point that is being made is that if you take a given drivetrain from engine to tires, the speed of the tires is directly proportional to engine speed (with a manual tranny anyways), thus the speed of the vehicle can be calculated from engine speed. There are no terms for wind resistance, rolling friction, etc, because they are irrelevant to this equation. That is not the same as saying that these factors are not factors in determining a cars top speed.
Basically, if you know the engine speed, you know the speed of the car and it 'ams what it ams' regardless of its weight, COD, rolling resistance, etc. |
Either way, it's haulin' balls. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif
------------------ 1988 Mustang GT 11.8 @ 123 (7/14/01) 1992 BadAzz Wrangler 1993 Explorer See my car at: www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?179 |
THX BLUEOOGT, that's what i thought, but just wanted to be sure...
yes it is hauling *** ------------------ Black,84 GT,ground effects,shorty headers, 'open' dual exh.,302 HO(no pollution control crap)bored .060,T5,89 ported heads,edelbrock Performer manifold, Edelbrock 2122 cam,600 Holley, high volume oil pump... Some day (3:73 gears & N2O)!!! will this ever end???? |
HMM 175MPH, I DON'T KNOW...A guy on LS1.COM has a Twin turbo'd Z28 with a 6-speed and he has like 650rwhp with 3:73's and he tops out at like 186mph. Get a damn radar gun! WTF you had skinnies on when you did this?
------------------ 1989 GT, 3:55's, full exhaust, 4 in. hood, Pro 5.0, etc... etc... 1989 Chevy S-10, EX. Cab-383(500+hp on motor), trick flow heads, trick flow pistons, etc... autometer phantom gauges, "built" 700R4, roll cage, lexan back window, corbeau seats, R.H.S. 5 harnesses, Fuel cell, convo pro wheels, 15x14's with 29x18.5 M/T'S on back, 15x4's on front, nitrous, and so much more! http://www.geocities.com/i8urvpr/JM.html |
I offer this page as "enlightenment" on the issue. http://members.home.net/rck/phor/06-Speed.html
------------------ 347 (Coast High short block), 279/284, TFS TW heads, Stealth, 750 Holley, Flowtech hdrs, Dr. Gas X, 2 Chmbr Flowmaster, MSD 6AL-Dist.& SS coil, March serpentine pulley system, Art Carr C-4 (Soon to be a Richmond 6 spd), Currie 9" w/3.50, alum Drv Shft, susp mods, Total Control subframes & tower braces, Trans Am Racing power dual master, 4 wheel disc, 17x8 Torqthrust II's Something up my sleeve ;) In a 66 coupe |
P.S. the math says my Richmond 6 speed in 6 gear at 6500 says I can do 246.768 MPH, Think I can go that fast ?
|
No matter what 5400RPMS in 5th with 3:73 gears is FLYING!!! I hope my car runs that well when I get the juice and the new motor done!
|
Your crazy! I pushed 5000rpm in 5th with 3.73's and a 24.5" tire and that was fast enough for me!
Skyler ------------------ -1989 Saleen Mustang #406- TFS TW Heads, E-303, Edelbrock intake, 70mm TB, 73mm MAF, 24lb injectors, 1 5/8 shorties, Off Road H, 3 Chamber flows, Jaz Race seats, Back seat removed, sub-frames, Roll Cage, and a 80 shot of N20. 12.54@107.4 Motor 332RWHP, 350rwtq |
According to my calculations, exgmguy was going 177 miles per hour.
Quote:
------------------ 351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible |
Remember, NASCAR cars don't have speedos, the drivers calculate speed by the RPM's and gears. If it's good enough for NASCAR it should work for us.
You can take into account rolling friction, wind resistance and the amount of dust on the dashboard, but the diffrence between 170 and 180 mph isn't all that much. Nice run! ------------------ '95 Chrome Yellow GT ragtop, KN filter charger, Dynomax cat back, Accel plugs and wires. |
That is with an Autometer tach too. If I went off the stock dash unit I would probably be going 90 mph. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif
wind resistance, etc.. does not change my gear ratio and tire size. All you have to do is hit the number on the tach in 5th and do the math. Simple as that. See my car at: http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?179 |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM. |