MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums

MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums (http://forums.mustangworks.com/index.php)
-   Stang Stories (http://forums.mustangworks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Wasted a new bullet. Guy was p#ssed (http://forums.mustangworks.com/showthread.php?t=9615)

94cobra2 05-15-2001 09:30 PM

Wasted a new bullet. Guy was p#ssed
 
I pulled up to this guy at the stop light next to a new bullet mustang, I have to say, the babe in the passenger seat imprssed me more. I did like the calipers thoght. I wasent really exspecting a race from this guy but i was ready when the light turned green, sure enough he guned it and i pulled him right away, I got going about 80mph and I would say i was about 3 car lenghts ahead, mabey more, i hit the brakes and he went by me giving me the finger, what a AS$.

------------------
1994 mustang gt
BBK equel lentgh headers, off road x-pipe, flowmaster 2 chamber. bbk underdrives, FMS 3:73, MSD 6al ignition, BBK cold air induction, 70mm throttle body, C&L mass air, K&N cone. Pro 5.0.
96 corba rear buber, 1998 cobra wheels 17/8, BFG Comp TA ZR 275/40 rear,245/45 front
Best ET (with g-tech)13.88

Dark_5.0 05-15-2001 10:02 PM

I have found that some of these 4.6 liter guys are as bad as camaro drivers. I always here this talk from them that stock for stock I would kill you. But come on how many fox bodies are stock. They only run 14.60's here and say when I get used to my car it will run mid 13's. Except for the occasional freak 4.6 like lizard king or ares most 4.6 cars run mid 14's stock. I have put maybe 70 miles on my car since I have bought so I damn sure aint used to mine I am not going to lie the best I have done with my car the one and only time I took it to the track was a 15.4 I could not launch (just sat and spun) and I could not hit the gears. I drove like sh!t what can I say I just wasnt used to shifting at 5200 rpms and I missed gear after gear. I think a 15.4 is pretty good considering I took forever to get it into third on that run. I have since practiced shifting at high speed and hope to hang with the mighty http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/rolleyes.gif4.6 liter this weekend

------------------
88 mustang gt convertible bored to 306 BBk equal length headers mac cold air fender kit cowl hood nitto drag radials ford racing clutch flow masters h-pipe 160* thermostat 16 degrees of timing electric fan off 94' t-bird jacobs electronics cap and wires

Lizard King 05-15-2001 11:52 PM

Holy dog doo man. 14.60 for a 4.6. Convertable & Auto I hope... if not take that driver out of his misery. I just ran against another Convertable like mine except he Chipped his for about 15HP ... and it was close.

I don't get it man. My G/F pulled a 14.4 driving the car for her second time (first time at the track) ... but have to admit she is gooooood. She had the car sqwaking out on the shift from first to second... very impressive! http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif

stanger8172 05-15-2001 11:52 PM

I have never come across any 4.6 liter nobs yet http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/rolleyes.gif but when I do I'll smoke 'em like a Garcia Vega.

5.0 HO,

Just give 'em some of your tire smoke. Maybe that'll bring them out of their coma!
------------------
'91 5.0 LX 'VERT,T-5, ported/polished/milled .030 stock E7 heads, 1.94/1.60 SS valves, 1.6 rr, K&N, ported MAF, glasspacks w/dumps, electric fans, FMS wires, short belt, March underdrives, March a/c eliminator, battery in the trunk, weighs 3330 with me in it, smoke your 4.6 http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/tongue.gif

46stang 05-16-2001 12:14 AM

don't feel bad 5.0ho, the last time i was at the track i ran a 16.08 at 98mph. i didn't move from the starting line until i shifted to 3rd gear. lets just say i was a little liberal on my launch http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif oh well still was fun! I should have got a burnout prize though http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif i think the trick is not to spin to much in the first 60 feet, at least thats what everyone says. It can only get better!
nice kill on the bullit! what an a$$ he was though. sore LOSER!
------------------
96 stang,ported 99 heads, 99 intake, 99 cams,Steeda power pullies,Kirban adj.reg.,Pro-m 87,24#inj.,70mm t/b,BBK longtube headers,Bassani x-pipe w/cats, Dynomax ultraflow catback,iat mod, home depot ram air, k@n,373's,cobra brakes,fms spings, tri-ax shifter.

[This message has been edited by 46stang (edited 05-16-2001).]

Mercury 05-16-2001 12:19 AM

Seems to me like some of the 5.0 guys are every bit as cocky. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/rolleyes.gif Like the guy who started swearing up and down that I was lying about my 2000 GT bieng stock. (at the time it was) He was ticked because his was modded somewhat heavily compared to my car, but he lost by so much.

Then theres the guy around here who has a 90 LX thats has a Heavily (cam, manifold, ignition, computer, headers, off road H-pipe) modded 5.0 but me and Tim C handed him his ego back. We tried to be nice about it, but he insisted on bieng a jerk.

Then there was the guy who had the front plate reading Bad A$$, with a Fox body 5.0. Well I handed him his A$$, and his girl told me to ***** off.

The list goes on and on. I like the 289's the 5.0's and the 4.6's, hey, there all Fords, thats all that matters really to me. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif But there are cocky drivers who drive damn Geo Metro's for cryin out loud.

Theres one guy at the local Muscle car hang out whos cocky as hell. If his 5.0 were as fast as he made it out to be, hed be running 4's or 5's in the quarter http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif When in actuallity he'd be hard pressed to get in the 12's.

Then theres the guy who doesnt brag, or show off, but has a 89 GT with a powerdyne with 9 PSI boost. He's cool as hell.

Okay I'm just rambling now..I'll shut up.

FivepointOH 05-16-2001 12:36 AM

Oh God...Nice kill...let's not start another of these 4.6 vs 5.0 posts again....

------------------
92 AOD GT, K&N, ram air, pulleys, 2 ch. flowmasters, 4:10's, shift kit, 1 5/8 mac longtubes and offroad hpipe 14.249 @ 97.34 mph before the headers and hpipe

Rev 05-16-2001 12:41 AM

Excuse me guys, If we're saying high 15's are the norm for 5.0s then OK, we have a BIG problem. We've all seen some '96 Verts with 4.6's run these times. If we are saying that 4.6's run these times, then that's OK, just don't sell the 4.6's short.

Rev

------------------
'66 Coupe, 306, 300 HP, C-4, 13.97 e.t., 100.3 mph
1/4 mi.

Dark_5.0 05-16-2001 12:45 PM

Ok man the sh!t is getting deep I see the 4.6's run every damn weekend and the best I have seen a stock 4.6 (5 SPEED) get in the 1/4 is a 14.44. NO!!! They are not vert auto's. Maybe some of you havent noticed that a mid 13 is about a full second faster than the advertised times for the new GT. Just cause some of the GT's run mid 13's by no means says that they all run mid 13's. The people with the mighty 4.6 in my hometown are so convinced that they can smoke stock vettes and LS1's when they first get there car. Cause they think they are buying a mid 13 sec. car... NOT! They say "those guys on stang works are runniin mid 13's" well when they get to the track mid 14 every damn time. I love ford mustangs all of them I would love to have a 4.6 liter stang I should of bought one instead of my 00'GMC truck. Im just reaching here but are the stangs sold in canada the same as the ones we get in the U.S. cause Canada doesnt have emmission laws right? I do believe Lizard king and Ares but I think that there cars are freaks and not the norm. Trust me I would love to see some 4.6 liter stangs dust my brothers camaro sometimes,but it just doesnt happen. Dont be mad at me i am not a cocky 5.0 guy trust me I could not take a 4.6 liter in the 1/4 right now But considering all of the ones here are mid to low 14's it wont be long. I dont hate on any mustang I love them all http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif

------------------
88 mustang gt convertible bored to 306 BBk equal length headers mac cold air fender kit cowl hood nitto drag radials ford racing clutch flow masters h-pipe 160* thermostat 16 degrees of timing electric fan off 94' t-bird jacobs electronics cap and wires

mmike 05-16-2001 01:19 PM

Hell yea we've got emissions laws. I agree its not the norm to see 4.6's in the 13's. Hell if I ever loose to a 4.6 (stock) i gunna cry(no offence anyone.)

red82gt 05-16-2001 01:26 PM

The mustangs in Canada are the same as the US ones, I've seen a bone stock automaic 4.6 coupe run 14.2@98 on street tires, seen a 4.6 5 speed run 13.9 @101 at Eagle in Ashcroft which is at 1700ft!

The way some of you guys talk down about the 4.6 is the same way the ricers talk down about mustangs on clusi.com!

BTW: Ford even lists the Quarter mile time for a 5 speed coupe as 14.1@100 mph

------------------
GT-40 heads (ported, polished, + milled), B303 cam, 1.7rr's, JE pistons, Offy intake, Carter AFB 625cfm carb, Flowtech 1 5/8" shortys, Flowtech X-pipe, MAC Flowpath exhaust, MAC pulleys, 373's, subframes, Eibachs+Tokicos, B+M ripper, FMS Clutch, Zoom Quadrant+cable, 17" CSA Ultra rims, 235/45ZR17 Yokohama AVS S4's, MSD 6A ignition+coil, FMS 9mm wires, Carbed, Naturally Aspirated, and Nasty!

Dark_5.0 05-16-2001 05:19 PM

Dude http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/rolleyes.gifwho talked down on the 4.6? I simply said that I havent seen it but I dont doubt it. Oh and about the auto runnin a 14.2 one word comes to mind well actually its two words B.S. Try runnin those times in the west Texas air Good luck.

------------------
88 mustang gt convertible bored to 306 BBk equal length headers mac cold air fender kit cowl hood nitto drag radials ford racing clutch flow masters h-pipe 160* thermostat 16 degrees of timing electric fan off 94' t-bird jacobs electronics cap and wires

red82gt 05-16-2001 07:05 PM

Okay, so it wasn't the nasty west Texas air, it was at Mission, B.C., almost always corrects to below sea level.

fordmanck 05-16-2001 08:06 PM

I've got a buddy with a 2000 GT, 5 speed. It has Off road exhaust, somekind of chip and a Pro 5.0 shifter. It has clicked off a 8.79 in the 1/8th. This is with a guy driving that had, up til now, never owned a fast car in his life. You guys with the 5.0's that are trying to hang on to the past, get over it. The 4.6's are fast now and can hand a STOCK 5.0 it's a$$ nine times out of ten. You guys are probably the same ones saying that the LS1's aren't fast either and you've never seen one break 14's stock.

------------------
My 94 GT

[This message has been edited by fordmanck (edited 05-16-2001).]

StoplightWarrior 05-16-2001 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fordmanck:
You guys with the 5.0's that are trying to hang on to the past, get over it. The 4.6's are fast now and can hand a STOCK 5.0 it's a$$ nine times out of ten.


Yeah, I agree that the old 5.0's are bad *** , and my brother and I are going to buy one this summer as a project car. Unfortunately, though, stock for stock, the 4.6 GT is faster. Not in EVERY instance, but in most cases, it is. The 5.0 guys dogged on the 96-98's, but now you gotta give the 99+'s some credit.

On the freeway the other day, I got up on the *** of this fox body 5.0. He saw me, and gunned it, I saw the puffs of smoke out his tailpipes, and so I also gunned it, and passed him easily. This was before the pulleys.

5.0's are sweet, and will always be a huge threat on the street, but c'mon guys, give the 4.6 its due. It's here to stay, and it's not that bad.

------------------
Black 2000 GT
Pulleys, mufflers, K&N
Steeda springs, subs, strut tower, CC plates

46stang 05-16-2001 09:44 PM

5.0ho, go to corral.net and check out the timeslip index. you'll see that there are plenty of 99 guys running in the 13's and some in the 12's. it's not just the canadian air http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/wink.gif I think it boils down to the driver and knowing his car! also the track! jmho.
leon

------------------
96 stang,ported 99 heads, 99 intake, 99 cams,Steeda power pullies,Kirban adj.reg.,Pro-m 87,24#inj.,70mm t/b,BBK longtube headers,Bassani x-pipe w/cats, Dynomax ultraflow catback,iat mod, home depot ram air, k@n,373's,cobra brakes,fms spings, tri-ax shifter.

Dark_5.0 05-16-2001 11:49 PM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by fordmanck:
[b]I've got a buddy with a 2000 GT, 5 speed. It has Off road exhaust, somekind of chip and a Pro 5.0 shifter. It has clicked off a 8.79 in the 1/8th. This is with a guy driving that had, up til now, never owned a fast car in his life. You guys with the 5.0's that are trying to hang on to the past, get over it. The 4.6's are fast now and can hand a STOCK 5.0 it's a$$ nine times out of ten. You guys are probably the same ones saying that the LS1's aren't fast either and you've never seen one break 14's stock.
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________ OK here is a prime example of one of these fuqtards talking about the 4.6 will hand a stock 5.0 its @ss. Duh, who cares.
BTW ls1's run in the 13's all the time here. There are not too many stock fox body 5.0's http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/rolleyes.gif. and there are a butt load of 4.6liter mustangs that run here. sure I have seen modded 4.6 mustangs run 12's even 11's HELL I like the 4.6 stangs "wish I had one" I would love to personaly see one run a 13 stock "I would dig that"

------------------
88 mustang gt convertible bored to 306 BBk equal length headers mac cold air fender kit cowl hood nitto drag radials ford racing clutch flow masters h-pipe 160* thermostat 16 degrees of timing electric fan off 94' t-bird jacobs electronics cap and wires

[This message has been edited by 5.0 HO (edited 05-17-2001).]

Zero596@gte.net 05-17-2001 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by FivepointOH:
Oh God...Nice kill...let's not start another of these 4.6 vs 5.0 posts again....

The battle has begun

FivepointOH 05-17-2001 09:06 AM

HAHA looks like the "Battle has begun" so I might as well jump in on this... in my opinion the 4.6's have way better top end and the 5.0's have a little advantage on the low end... 1/4 the 4.6 will probably win stock vs stock but it might be close... 1/8 I'd have to give the advantage to the 5.0... for some reason the 4.6's seem to be a lot harder to launch than 5.0's too... although I have only driven one four or five times few of my friends that have owned both that I race always either bog or burn the tires with the 4.6... anyway BOTH cars are fast and I have much respect for both and both respond great to boltons... just depends on which one you personally prefer or sometimes which one your pocket book prefers. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/wink.gif

------------------
92 AOD GT, K&N, ram air, pulleys, 2 ch. flowmasters, 4:10's, shift kit, 1 5/8 mac longtubes and offroad hpipe 14.249 @ 97.34 mph before the headers and hpipe

Lizard King 05-17-2001 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 5.0 HO:
...sure I have seen modded 4.6 mustangs run 12's even 11's HELL I like the 4.6 stangs "wish I had one" I would love to personaly see one run a 13 stock "I would dig that"


How does 13.8 with a 200lbs camera man in board ... and braking at the end to a trap speed of 82MPH (bracket racing) sound???

Let's start Diggin, Dude!

BTW, I've been called a mutant, a freak, I've been flamed, I've been to war... My car ran at least 30 13.7xx, a 13.69 & now a 13.66. Stock. Stock. Stock.

I bet ya I could bring any Stock 99+ GT (5 speed, coupe) down to those times. The reason I say that is I recently met with 3 other 99+ stang at the locals here and they proved to me my car is not a freak. It's the driver. Once the car is launched the winner is established right there.

Those gawdawful drivers pulling those horrible "mid 14s" in a 99+ coupe 5spd should be be put out of their misery. My advice?: buy yourself a Taurus... you wont need shift and calculate your revs at the line.

Dark_5.0 05-17-2001 12:30 PM

My advice?: buy yourself a Taurus... you wont need shift and calculate your revs at the line.[/B][/QUOTE]
_____________________________________________
Oh please dude a "taurus" did you think of that all by your self http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/rolleyes.gif. Ok lizard "KING" PLEASE.. please forgive me if I have offended any of you 4.6 drivers by stating that I like your cars and I wish I had one. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif Damn it I am such an @sshole http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/frown.gif I give lizard king props in everything I post about the 4.6L, but it appears that my slow sluggish 5.0 is not worthy. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/frown.gif So sadly http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/frown.gif I am going to lunch now to look at the local ford dealership for a Taurus. If I get a taurus I still wont be as fast as the "lizard" but at least i can say that I can haul more groceries than U anyday buddy http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif

------------------
88 mustang gt convertible bored to 306 BBk equal length headers mac cold air fender kit cowl hood nitto drag radials ford racing clutch flow masters h-pipe 160* thermostat 16 degrees of timing electric fan off 94' t-bird jacobs electronics cap and wires

fordmanck 05-17-2001 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 5.0 HO:
I have found that some of these 4.6 liter guys are as bad as camaro drivers. I always here this talk from them that stock for stock I would kill you. But come on how many fox bodies are stock. They only run 14.60's here and say when I get used to my car it will run mid 13's. Except for the occasional freak 4.6 like lizard king or ares most 4.6 cars run mid 14's stock. I have put maybe 70 miles on my car since I have bought so I damn sure aint used to mine I am not going to lie the best I have done with my car the one and only time I took it to the track was a 15.4 I could not launch (just sat and spun) and I could not hit the gears. I drove like sh!t what can I say I just wasnt used to shifting at 5200 rpms and I missed gear after gear. I think a 15.4 is pretty good considering I took forever to get it into third on that run. I have since practiced shifting at high speed and hope to hang with the mighty http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/rolleyes.gif4.6 liter this weekend



Read what you wrote up there fuktard. I have a 5.0 in case you didn't realize that. I'm just sticking up for the new 4.6's because you are under the delusion that they are mid 14 second cars(see above). Please do not insult my intelligence again thinking I was talking out of my a$$. Care to stick your foot in your mouth again?


------------------
My 94 GT

[This message has been edited by fordmanck (edited 05-17-2001).]

[This message has been edited by fordmanck (edited 05-17-2001).]

Lizard King 05-17-2001 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 5.0 HO:
I give lizard king props in everything I post about the 4.6L, but it appears that my slow sluggish 5.0 is not worthy. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/frown.gif So sadly http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/frown.gif I am going to lunch now to look at the local ford dealership for a Taurus. If I get a taurus I still wont be as fast as the "lizard" but at least i can say that I can haul more groceries than U anyday buddy http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif


5.0 HO ... I was just trying to make you dig man. You said if you would see a 13 second 4.6 Stock, that you would dig it! http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif If you look closely at my post, I have not once mentionned anything about the 5.0s.

I can truthfully say when I hit this board the 5.0 in general are all faster than all the locals we have here. It's sorta of anoying cuz none of the locals want to line up anymore and prove me wrong ... except for one mean red cobra (he runs very low 13s NA).

------------------
Lizard King, Bone Stock; 13.69 at 101MPH
Extreme Burnout
2000GT VS LS1
Quartermile run
2000GT vs LX Stang


Lizard King 05-17-2001 05:19 PM

BTW, 5.0 HO thanks for the props man... but without that video we both know I would flamed to pieces right?

Oh and Fuktard will be added to my vocabulary under the really cool name calling section.

http://www.trainboard.com/smiles/047.gif Gringoss... you a fuktard man!!
http://www.trainboard.com/smiles/058.gif What did you call me?
http://www.trainboard.com/smiles/047.gif You heard me fuktard!
http://www.trainboard.com/smiles/056.gif WHAAAAAAAAA...

fordmanck 05-17-2001 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 5.0 HO:
OK here is a prime example of one of these fuqtards talking about the 4.6 will hand a stock 5.0 its @ss. Duh, who cares.
BTW ls1's run in the 13's all the time here. There are not too many stock fox body 5.0's http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/rolleyes.gif. and there are a butt load of 4.6liter mustangs that run here. sure I have seen modded 4.6 mustangs run 12's even 11's HELL I like the 4.6 stangs "wish I had one" I would love to personaly see one run a 13 stock "I would dig that"


Just wanted to show I wasn't the one who started with the fuktard. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif



------------------
My 94 GT

Dark_5.0 05-17-2001 07:05 PM

Oh come om "FORDMANCK" its all in good fun I can see that you are assuming you have to drive a 4.6liter to be a fuqtard. Actually most "fuqtards" drive RICE. I have removed my foot rom my mouth http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif. HEY LIZARD I really dig your video man Fast car and good driving http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif

Unit 5302 05-17-2001 09:51 PM

I could always argue there are a ton of stock 13 second 5.0's too.

Personally, I think the 5.0 and 4.6's are pretty even when both are driven balls to the wall's. Maybe a slight edge to the 4.6.

Lizard King 05-17-2001 11:38 PM

If you dig my job is done. http://www.trainboard.com/smiles/048.gif

I new Unit was on his way with his .02 cents. ...I could argue until I meet the 5.0 that shows me the 13s stock. That's my .02 cents.

------------------
http://members.mustangworks.com/liza...rdKing_sig.gif
13.66 @ 100.3MPH, Stock (except for K&N Filter)

Quartermile run

[This message has been edited by Lizard King (edited 05-18-2001).]

69fastback 05-18-2001 05:19 AM

Yeah well my car ran 13.6s bone stock back in 69 on blys ply tires. Bet u guys wish u could do that. :P

Just kiding guys don't get all mad. I love all mustangs. 5.0s 4.6s what ever it is I love to see them whip some butt. Lets face it though mine is just better http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif. Just messing with u guys again trying to stir up more trouble.

------------------
69 428 cobra jet: tons of mods.
97 f-150 5.4 xlt mark III
BUCKLE UP. SUCK IT IN.
Objects in the mirror are about to disappear...
QUICKLY!!!!!!


mmike 05-18-2001 08:03 AM

Lizard, kodos to a fast running(driving) 4.6.
I have a question though: when you say you ran a 13.6x stock, bone stock is that without the K&N and with the headlight in.
Just curious. As far as I'm concerned K&N and headlight out = not stock.
No disrespect, just curious. BTW you'd prob. beat me on the street with my driving and those times.(need more practice and tuning http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif

------------------
306ci, TFS stage 3 heads. port/pol edlebrock performer intake.
77mm mass air, 70mm TB, crane 2030 cam, Mac full length headers, flowmasters
3.73 gears and more.

[This message has been edited by mmike (edited 05-18-2001).]

Rocket 99GT 05-18-2001 10:29 AM

5.0 H0... I think you are just a little kid who wants to stir some $hit here.
First of all I don't think anyone here believes that you did beat the bullit, oh I forgot you were dreaming that you won right.
Why don't you come in my car and I will show you some real power.
Please go bull$hit someone in another web site.
........................................


99GT…
rear sway bar (adjustable)
rear lower control arm
traction bars,
tokiko struts illumina 5 position,
tokiko shocks,
caster camber plates
racing lower springs
3:73
strut tower brace
underdrive pulleys
Michelin “pilot XGT-Z4. 245x17
No silencer
No spare tire


Dark_5.0 05-18-2001 10:59 AM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Rocket 99GT:
[B]5.0 H0... I think you are just a little kid who wants to stir some $hit here.
First of all I don't think anyone here believes that you did beat the bullit, oh I forgot you were dreaming that you won right.
Why don't you come in my car and I will show you some real power.
Please go bull$hit someone in another web site.
......................................

Ok now you are an idiot first of all I did not start this forum. I have never raced a bullit or a new mustang. I am far from a little kid if you must know I am 25 and a pipeyard foreman My mustang is just something that I bought to play with I also own a 00'GMC truck and a 91 crx. Its ok man I have grown to understand that it takes all types of people to make life fun. I get a kick out of people like you that talk out your @ss without knowing what your talking about. Man this has got to hurt realizing how dumb you just sounded. Oh well ive got to go back to work at my little kid job. Have a nice day 8=====> http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif

------------------
88 mustang gt convertible bored to 306 BBk equal length headers mac cold air fender kit cowl hood nitto drag radials ford racing clutch flow masters h-pipe 160* thermostat 16 degrees of timing electric fan off 94' t-bird jacobs electronics cap and wires

05-18-2001 01:35 PM

LizardKing.......very nice times for a stocker (I saw the video). Congrats on the coming of the little lizardprince/princess!

------------------
'90 LX 5.0; 12K original miles (no sh*&); 3.55 gears; pulleys;Edelbrock Performer Heads; BBK shorties; MSD 6AL box w/ blaster 2 coil; Motorsport E303 cam; Pro-M 75mm MAF; BBK 70mm TB; Eibach spring kit; Southside welded subs; K&N cone filter charger; Hurst shifter; fiberglass turbo hood; A/C-less; rear seat-less; cat-less; 2 chamber Flos; Corbeau racing seats (fronts);
30# injectors; 190 lb fp; TFS track heat Intake (12.299 @ 113)

Lizard King 05-18-2001 06:31 PM

mmike, I did have the headlight out ... but had the stock air filter when I ran 13.69 and 13.7xx... With the headlight in, My best is probably around 13.9, maybe 13.8.

It's cool with me if you consider that modified. I would like to specify that when I run people at our races on the weekend I do pull out the headlight... I consider no added parts stock, but that is a long debate.

bada$$lx, thanks for the compliment. I will be having a little boy(gecko) in about 15 days. My wife bought him a little Lizard PG with a flame retardant DODO blanket... hehehe. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif

Boys this is why the Lizard is still stock http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/frown.gif . But that's ok, having a little one will compensate completely. (i'm thinking 1 pistons dragster)

Try Me 05-19-2001 12:03 AM

Mercury - We too have a cocky bastard at our races. His name's CamaroBoy http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif

5.0 - Quit the trash talking. I'll line you up with my SN-95 any old day of the f*cking week, and show you the margin the "driver factor" provides :-)

All you panzies that claim the new Stangs are good for mid-14's should follow Lizards advice and place an order for that Taurus asap!

As for claiming the new 4.6 will beat lS1 and LS6's, well that's just dumb. The LS's run low 13's, high 12's.

I saw a Bullet on Bank Street last week. Some older guy was driving it, and he was DRIVING it http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif Wether the Bullet is a beast compared to the conventional 4.6 has yet to be determined. Until then, i'm watching my azz when a 4.6 pulls up on me http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif

Mercury 05-19-2001 12:49 AM

Crisping an LT-1 with a 99+4.6 aint that hard. I've got wittnesess who have watched me, and themselves have toasted plenty O' LT-1's. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif

Mad Bad, I thought you said LT-1s.

------------------
64 1/2 "D" code Red Mustang Coupe. 289, C4, 3:1 rear gear. Mallory duel point. Ported & Polished 65 heads shaved .01 with 351 windsor valves, 11:1 comp, 1.7:1 sled rockers, blue wolverine lumpy cam, modified autolite 4100 Hipo 4 barrel. And to many others to list

2000 Perf Red Mustang GT. 5spd. BBK Underdrive pulleys, Flotech off-road H pipe. Hurst T-Handle

64 1/2 red 6cyl coupe. Auto. project car.

[This message has been edited by Mercury (edited 05-19-2001).]

Dark_5.0 05-19-2001 01:44 AM



5.0 - Quit the trash talking. I'll line you up with my SN-95 any old day of the f*cking week, and show you the margin the "driver factor" provides
__________________________________________________ ________________________________________ If you consider me admitting that I ran a dismal 15.4 trash talking well I just dont know what to say. but if you are questioning my driving skills you dont know what you are talking about. I have just returned from the track and although my best time was a 15.2 at 90 mph. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/frown.gif I did win alot of races, over hear a perfect light is .500. I pulled a .5004 RT and 4 other RT's under a .530. On my 15.20 run I beat a 2001 cobra he ran a 15.26 @91mph. He may have missed a gear or something I dont know, but a kill is a kill I wanted to tell the guy good race but he was a sore loser. You can buy speed but not skills. My car may be slow compared to yours but just like the 01' cobra learned today you cant win every race. And I guess it would not be fair if i did not mention that I did lose to two different 4.6 liters stangs one of them ran a 13.7 with slicks and I dont know what else. And the other was an auto I think and beat me with a 14.7 against my 15.3 it sounds like I got smoked but I killed her off of the light and it was a close race. I make it a point not to trash talk since most people on this board could outrun me. If I was talking trash I would lie and say I run 13's with my stock 2.73's and light mods like some people do on this board. If you came down here and waxed me in a bracket race I would tell you good race shake your hand and want to go again. I might get a little bit out of hand with my mouth on the computer, but like I told the other guy its all in good fun man http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif


------------------
88 mustang gt convertible bored to 306 BBk equal length headers mac cold air fender kit cowl hood nitto drag radials ford racing clutch flow masters h-pipe 160* thermostat 16 degrees of timing electric fan off 94' t-bird jacobs electronics cap and wires

aurilius_maximus 05-19-2001 10:47 AM

Well, I am sensing some hostility in here... Just thought I would throw out some honest numbers that I ran last night. I was consistantly running 14.4's and I had a 14.2@101. I will admit I do not know how to drive that well...

____________________
96 Cobra Basically Stock

aurilius_maximus 05-19-2001 10:53 AM

Well, I am sensing some hostility in here... Just thought I would throw out some honest numbers that I ran last night. I was consistantly running 14.4's and I had a 14.2@101. I will admit I do not know how to drive that well...

____________________
96 Cobra Basically Stock

Lizard King 05-19-2001 10:58 AM

From what I've seen, that sounds about right for a stock Cobra96. Do you think there is much room for improvement on that time?

purebred94 05-19-2001 12:50 PM

I don't know, but I've heard from more than one 4.6 owner that they have a harder time getting power out of the things.

Every car is different, I ran against a bone stock 97 when my 94 only had 3:55 gears and a K&N air filter and I got smoked. At the same time, I could run against other 4.6's with at least flowmasters and I'd smoke them. Now though, I've done some more work and I can't get anyone to go up against me anymore. Even the cocky little rice burners don't look twice when I pass them.

I just think most of it is the driver.

94 GT underdrive pulleys, cold air K&N, 70mm throttle body, BBK equal length headers, bassani x-pipe w/high flow cats, flowmaster 2chambers. (I must admit it's an automatic, but at least it has a shift kit.)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.