MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-12-2001, 11:58 PM   #1
90LxDroptop
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arlington Hts. IL
Posts: 315
Default Which Long Tubes to go with Force II cat-back?

Hey everyone...I was wondering which long tube headers do you suggest to go with the Force II Cat-back system?...
__________________
90 LX Convertible 5.0 AOD 3.73 Gears, Underdrive Pulleys, TransGo shift kit, A servo, Subframe Connectors, o/r h-pipe, 2 chamber flows, Pony Wheels
90LxDroptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2001, 12:07 AM   #2
1BAD89
Tubbed and Juiced
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,861
Default

BBK.
1BAD89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2001, 08:17 PM   #3
Dave_mustang_50
Registered Member
 
Dave_mustang_50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 483
Default

I have had my mac`s on for about 4 years and they still look like new. I`ve heard people having problems though. They sound real good. Not too loud with the top down either. I recently changed from the high flow cats to off road and it made a big diff. One thing I noticed was my engine bay seemed to get much hotter with those coated headers. Either way I`m sure youll have fun.
Good luck
__________________
1969 Mach 1 351C with a c6(for now)

Sold 92 Rag Top GT
Procharged & intercooled DSS 331 LC
Holley Systemax 2 Intake, Edelbrock RPM Heads,E 303 ,blow thru air meter, race bypass, 42 pph injectors,65mm tb,1.7 rr, Mac long tube headers w/off road H pipe, Force 2 catback, TKO,Pro 5.0, K&N, Alum DS,3 core radiator, subframe connectors,3.73`s, Nitto DR`s and a Heavy Foot.
Dave_mustang_50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2001, 01:28 PM   #4
1BAD89
Tubbed and Juiced
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,861
Default

Quote:
One thing I noticed was my engine bay seemed to get much hotter with those coated headers.
Your engine bay seemed much hotter with the jet-hot coated headers?
1BAD89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2001, 08:20 PM   #5
Dave_mustang_50
Registered Member
 
Dave_mustang_50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 483
Default

I was told it was because the htc coating dissapates heat.
__________________
1969 Mach 1 351C with a c6(for now)

Sold 92 Rag Top GT
Procharged & intercooled DSS 331 LC
Holley Systemax 2 Intake, Edelbrock RPM Heads,E 303 ,blow thru air meter, race bypass, 42 pph injectors,65mm tb,1.7 rr, Mac long tube headers w/off road H pipe, Force 2 catback, TKO,Pro 5.0, K&N, Alum DS,3 core radiator, subframe connectors,3.73`s, Nitto DR`s and a Heavy Foot.
Dave_mustang_50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2001, 02:23 PM   #6
1BAD89
Tubbed and Juiced
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,861
Default

How do you like your systemax II heads?
1BAD89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2001, 07:46 PM   #7
Dave_mustang_50
Registered Member
 
Dave_mustang_50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 483
Default

Its hard to say. I had the kit installed all at once. The total combo puts 302/307 HP/TQ to the rear wheels. The cam has a nice lopey idle and its very streetable.I have the smaller 1.90 heads not the 2.02 heads Rick91GT has.
__________________
1969 Mach 1 351C with a c6(for now)

Sold 92 Rag Top GT
Procharged & intercooled DSS 331 LC
Holley Systemax 2 Intake, Edelbrock RPM Heads,E 303 ,blow thru air meter, race bypass, 42 pph injectors,65mm tb,1.7 rr, Mac long tube headers w/off road H pipe, Force 2 catback, TKO,Pro 5.0, K&N, Alum DS,3 core radiator, subframe connectors,3.73`s, Nitto DR`s and a Heavy Foot.
Dave_mustang_50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2001, 09:29 PM   #8
Five0
Registered Member
 
Five0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: middleburg, fl, usa
Posts: 1,134
Default

I have the mac on mine, the fit is ok.


Here you can see the header rubs the firewall.
__________________
James Cox
RHC Member #44
nochevy@hotmail.com

1991 Mustang LX
Dart iron eagle block, 4340 28oz 347 crank, 4340 h-beam rods, probe ultra light pistons canfield heads “race ported by Brent Frazier”, solid roller cam and lifters “custom grind”, kooks 1 7/8" race headers, and much more.

Engine built by Brent Frazier.
Five0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2001, 11:12 PM   #9
fastang
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: santa ana ca
Posts: 1,349
Default

I've been running the BBK's for about a year now and havent had any real problems. Some AC and smog pump hoses were sitting too close and getting burnt so be carefull and strap them down away from the headers well.

I have the force II 3chambers and H pipe with hi flo cats, definitely unique sounding around here.
__________________
98 GT manual trans, Magna Flow exh.
old car: 95GT, TFS T.W. heads, Holley Intake, B303 cam, FRPP 30lb injectors, Scorpion 1.6 rollers, 65mm TB, 73mm MAF, BBK Longtubes, Flowmaster cat back, March Pulleys, MSD coil, 9mm wires, Tremec 3550 trans, Pro5.0 shifter,10.5 Motorsport clutch, FMS aluminum driveshaft, weld in subframe connectors. 190lph pump, BBK adj FPR.
fastang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2001, 08:55 PM   #10
Mustang_289
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 512
Default

We installed MAC long-tubes on our 88GT, while we were at it - we installed carquest motor mounts. Noticed the drivers side header was rubbing against the steering linkage. Come to find out - the carquest mounts sat the block a little higher than oem causing the header tube to rise and rub against the linkage.

Went with the Energy Suspension mounts, which actually lowered the block slightly, and corrected the problem. If anyone is looking to run longtube headers beware of motor mounts. Even the stock oem ford mounts over time might cause lt headers to rub on firewall or against the steering linkage.
Mustang_289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2001, 10:26 PM   #11
ricekilla
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: sinful boys SO CAL
Posts: 736
Default

if you want a cheap knock off of the mac longtubes, go with the bbk. but if you want the best headers in the performance exhaust industry hands down, go with the mac longtubes. combine 30+ years experience making headers with quality hand craftsmanship and you got a damn nice set of headers that will LAST. pick up a pro chamber and a mac flowpath catback system too. the flowpath muffler out flows the dynomax and flowmaster by 49 cfm and doesnt have any packing to blow out.
__________________
89 GT, 3.55's, longtubes, pro chamber, flowpath dumps, mac uppers and lowers+ pinion snubber, underdrive pullies, 70mm t-body, 190 lph penis pump, mildly home ported E7'S by the kid hisself, nitto drag radials..... 13.4 @ 106......... on nitto drag raidials. spinning like gangbusters......

chevy silverado w/ a full works suzuki RM 250 and a full works honda fourtrax 250R (girlfriends bike) in the back, moto x'in it up bro!
ricekilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2001, 09:49 PM   #12
ThndrNLightning
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 7
Cool

I've installed and run both the MAC 1-5/8 headers and the BBKs. IMHO, hands down BBK. They are thicker gauge, thicker flanges, and fit like a glove. Never had a single issue with BBK. I've had problems with 2 sets of MAC longtubes.....with fitup mainly.

BTW, I currently run the BBKs with offroad and the Force II (3-chamber) system and it is music to my ears. Mufflers are truly sound quality devices on most street cars. And one would be hard-pressed to pick up a sound quality difference between longtube header manufacturers...

Just my 2 cents. Happy holidays!

- Kevin
ThndrNLightning is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
clutch cable and my long tubes... leathal injection Windsor Power 4 09-10-2004 02:56 PM
would i benefit from long tubes? dragstang86 Windsor Power 5 03-14-2003 12:17 PM
what long tubes for gt40p heads? stng87 Windsor Power 3 02-27-2003 07:18 AM
1 3/4 Hooker Long Tubes vs Shorties results! 8850 Windsor Power 2 02-04-2001 12:42 AM
Pics of 1 3/4 Hooker Long Tubes #6227 8850 Windsor Power 5 01-30-2001 06:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 PM.


SEARCH