Quote:
Originally posted by rbatson
I actually read it somewhere. I'll see if I can find the web page or rag that said that. This mag must be wrong because it only shows a 51 dry weight difference. Where do you get your info??
BTW... WELCOME to the board!!
|
Man, I hate being wrong... I just checked and you are correct. Damned 2002 numbers. I am used to the 1999 -2000 numbers. Damned bike used to be close to 500 wet compared to the R6's 426 wet weight. It appears it's up on power as well. It used to be rated below 65 hp and 34 lbs of torque.
It may very well be possible with the increased torqu that it could take the R6 on short distances...... I stand corrected
__________________
1988 5.0 notch: Previously never modified!!
SN95 block front and rear seats, Mac catback, BBK off-road H-pipe, Steeda castor camber plates, Steeda lowering springs, Tokico shocks/struts, Alpine/MBQuart/PPI audio mods...