View Single Post
Old 07-30-2003, 03:41 PM   #14
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 96_4.6
Theres not that much of a difference in times between 94&95 and 96&97, some even said thr 96,97 are quicker but some say there not
The 96-98 stangs suck compared to a 94-95 stang as far as performance goes.

I spend alot of time at the track. Any 94-95 stock 5 speed can hit 14's.

I have seen 96-98's run 15.2-15.5 all day long.

Then start modding and the 94-95 leaves the 96-98 in the dust.

I have friends with 94-95 stangs running 11's all motor with the stock short block.

I have a 320HP 01 cobra and my 90LX with the stock short block, cam and mnodded stock heads smokes it.

Bad,
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote