© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
11-25-2002, 11:28 PM | #21 |
I got something to say
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,557
|
my 89 has a 140 mph speedo and 16in rims
of course the rims arent stock.....
__________________
91 LX Hatch 5.0 - made for the twisties 89 LX Hatchback 5.0 5spd. stolen/stripped 4/7/05 http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/...splay.cgi?3494 1987 Toyota Pickup Ricer Haters Club Member #33 Want a custom gauge cluster for your Vintage Mustang? www.jmeenterprises.com |
11-26-2002, 10:23 AM | #22 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5
|
Somewhere along hte line I got lost. I think it is when i was told to get a "fox" body or whatever, I have no clue waht that means lol sorry. I"m new to cars. Anyway, someone asked if it was manual or auto. It's an auto and y'all keep saying insurance will rape me (I'm relieved to here someone else other than me use that term in a sentence, but thats not the point, lol) The insurance wouldnt rape me, I got a quote
(Allstate Insurance Company) Under my parents name?: Liability only: $84 month. Full Coverage: $182 month. That's not cheap, but its not expensive eiither... But I've come up with another solution. Please dont be mad. lol I've decided not to get the '89. I'm going to take my dads jeep cherokee and drive it around for a couple months and then decide waht to get. Since I'm not getting the '89 my new dilema is whether I should get the '95 mustang or a 97 Eclipse. Eclipse's are nice cars. You can modify them and they are cheaper on insurance. What do you all think? Sorry to keep asking for opinions
__________________
~Eo2k1~ |
11-26-2002, 12:08 PM | #23 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 371
|
hey man sounds like a plan, learn on the jeep so you don't molest a pristine stang. i gurantee you won't regret waiting.
fox- is the industry term for the 1979-1993 body designation of mustangs, beginning in 79- an goin till the last Gt in 93. their were generally 2 body styles: a hatchback a notchback, both relatively the same setup, engine, trannie, with the GT hatchback actually being a lil slower in the 1/4 mile that its lighter lil brother the LX 5.0 due to its added weight from the ground effects. the lx 5.0 was essentially a poor mans GT, strippped down interior, power nuthin, an no body kit. but the right ticket for anybody lookin to throw these ponies down the 1/4 mile with the introduction of the new body style in 94 the name changed from fox to SN95<- (jus industry term again designating body styles) some people call it the Fox-4 cause it was essentially the same set up as fox, but the 4 represented the birth year..1994. the 5.0 lasted another year,(1995) but was replaced with the modular 4.6 in 96.
__________________
0h n0 5.0 Alias:94five0, Vr00m, Black Shuck 1994 GT 5.0l |
11-26-2002, 04:25 PM | #24 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 380
|
good call on waiting to get what you really want......
and for the love of God, don't get an Eclipse...............i can almost guarantee you that what you save in insurance will go towards repairs.....if you really want one, read as much as you can about these cars, because there is a lot of stuff you should know going into the purchase..........these cars have lots of issues and many of these cars are abused.......and the n/a's don't have that much potential
__________________
2002 vw gti 1.8T Last edited by this is not cbring; 11-26-2002 at 05:01 PM.. |
11-26-2002, 04:36 PM | #25 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,325
|
Wow, for once I agree with this is not cbring.
Do not waste your time and money on the Eclipse. It's obvious from your first post that you want a Mustang, so a Mustang you should get. It took me 7 long years of driving other vehicles (8 of them to be exact) to realize that I should have just gotten a Mustang to start with. Drive the Jeep for as long as he will let you, looking for 'the' car the whole time. I found mine witk 31k miles on it, this summer. There are solid good deal cars out there, take your time and find one.
__________________
1997 Mustang GT "The Freak" - 13.80 @ 101.70, 2.07 60' 1995 Honda VFR750 - not much @ really fast (actual data pending.) 1964.5 Mustang 289 Rice Haters Club Member #13 |
11-28-2002, 10:58 PM | #26 |
Mustangs
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,938
|
I'd never drive a jeep, those things are junk.....wait i do drive a jeep
With 230,000 miles on it the Jeep is still ticking (has header leak). Good to hear you have an idea of what you want. I would highly recommend any other car other than an eclipse or mitsubishi (not a big fan of mitsubishi). Good luck,
__________________
2005 Suzuki Hayabusa GSX1300-R 1980 Ford Thunderbird - 255 V8 ported heads, 5.0L ported stock headers, O.R. H-pipe and Flowmaster 2-chambers, dual roller timing chain hi-po Mack Truck hood emblem 1985 Mustang GT 5.0L T5, F-303, GT40p, headers, off-road h, flowmasters, MSD stuff, etc. Sold 02/06/04 1989 Mustang GT ET: 13.304@102.29 mph (5-24-03) Sold - 1998 Mustang Cobra coupe, 1/4 mile - street tires: 13.843@103.41 (bone stock) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs | Mach1 Cobra Jet | Classic Mustangs | 20 | 07-11-2005 08:06 PM |
t-5, is it the same in the 4 cylinder and V8 | ex-lt1-guy | Windsor Power | 12 | 03-03-2002 01:59 AM |
Jap car vs. Ford car, then driver and friends vs. other driver and friends | SlowStang2 | Stang Stories | 17 | 08-12-2001 02:43 AM |
89-Mustang pulling trailer -vs- 2000 Mustang | Five0 | Stang Stories | 7 | 04-01-2001 02:50 AM |
Salaeen, Shelby, Cobra please define these for me. | Taqus | Blue Oval Lounge | 3 | 01-17-2001 02:39 AM |