© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
06-25-2002, 11:03 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
No more 4.6L's
At least not a newer one. I don't want to be grouped with the modular guys. There's just too many stupid one's. Too many ricers, and I don't want to be grouped with the crowd.
|
06-25-2002, 11:24 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 1,311
|
WTF?? Where did that come from?
Im assuming something jacked up just happened to make you post this hasty, odd thread. So what gives??
__________________
Black 2000 GT Auto V2-SQ, Full Steeda G-trac Suspension, Baer Brakes, Saleen Body Kit, Corbeau CR1s, Chrome Cobra R's, etc, etc... 341rwhp, 338 torque 1994 Cobra #4343 Bolt on's only... Cofounder of Raccoon Racing |
06-25-2002, 11:31 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sale Creek, TN. C. S. A.
Posts: 4,652
|
unit, wtf im not rice i only have 4 sticker's haha, yeah what warrior said , you are grouping us all in the rice catagory, not fair kell, im not rice
__________________
95 gt vert, lot's of stuff, it aint slow. 04 sonic blue v - six my beater 89 rs camaro iroc turbo hood, other stuff, my wifes ride 84 lx stang cammed up 289 hi po, etc 65 falcon, maybe by the year 2020. black 00gt, gone but never forgotten. R H C- member # 1 o.b.c. da prez- member # 1 if your under 40 dont ask. goodbye for now odie,r.i.p. 11-27-03 |
06-25-2002, 11:38 PM | #4 |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
4.6 disenchantment
O.K., your feelings about the 4.6 Mustang have been noted.
Now, care to elaborate a bit? Some of us are curious as to what's caused this fairly sudden attitude change, considering you just bought a sharp, new GT. |
06-25-2002, 11:45 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sale Creek, TN. C. S. A.
Posts: 4,652
|
yeah what mr5 0 said, kell im am far from rice, i hate rice, import or domestic rice, i laugh at all of them, im keeping my rice 4.6 if thats the way it is, whats bugging you?
__________________
95 gt vert, lot's of stuff, it aint slow. 04 sonic blue v - six my beater 89 rs camaro iroc turbo hood, other stuff, my wifes ride 84 lx stang cammed up 289 hi po, etc 65 falcon, maybe by the year 2020. black 00gt, gone but never forgotten. R H C- member # 1 o.b.c. da prez- member # 1 if your under 40 dont ask. goodbye for now odie,r.i.p. 11-27-03 |
06-26-2002, 12:31 AM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
Join me at the bar, Kell? Might help.
Take care, -Chris
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
06-26-2002, 12:38 AM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,325
|
I'm all for bringing the 302 back. Just make sure its got plenty of valves and even more ponies.
Seriously man, WTF? Did you grenade yours or something?
__________________
1997 Mustang GT "The Freak" - 13.80 @ 101.70, 2.07 60' 1995 Honda VFR750 - not much @ really fast (actual data pending.) 1964.5 Mustang 289 Rice Haters Club Member #13 |
06-26-2002, 12:43 AM | #8 |
It's a lot like a race car
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 4,130
|
WTF
__________________
1987 Buick T-type 1998 HD Electra Elide |
06-26-2002, 12:50 AM | #9 |
All about the Windsor.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,052
|
I pray you didn't get rid of your new GT!??!?!!
|
06-26-2002, 12:54 AM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
i doubt this has anything to do with the engine or the vehicle, but more likely some of his fellow owners.
Time will tell.
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
06-26-2002, 05:56 AM | #11 | |
Yay for Chickys
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,532
|
Re: No more 4.6L's
Quote:
Also, the 4.6 is a better candidate for someone that wants a fast car that doesn't need too many mods (5.0s are easier to tear down) and could feasily spend most of his money on appearance mods. |
|
06-26-2002, 07:44 AM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
I see his point, Going to Modular madness and reading some of the post in there that say things like "5.0's are slow as rice".............Makes me sick......Reminds me of mustangworld.com...
JMO,
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer Last edited by Dark_5.0; 06-26-2002 at 10:38 AM.. |
06-26-2002, 09:18 AM | #13 | ||
AKA "Dr. Evil"
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: South Fork Ranch
Posts: 1,721
|
Quote:
Quote:
and our forum is NOTHING like Mustangworld other than the fact that most newbie mustang drivers drive the 4.6. Would you rather they go to stangnet and learn how to put in neon undercarriage lights or come hear and learn what a set of 3.73s can do for performance? Personally, I love the old 5.0, but the modular motor is here, and whether you like it or not, its going to be here for a while. And actually, stock for stock, the 2nd generation 4.6 SOHC mustang does have more horsepower and IS a bit faster in the quarter mile than a 5.0 GT\LX. I would hope that our 5.0 brothers would accept us and join us in spanking the heck out of all those ricers. (Foreign OR domestic)
__________________
Uncle Sam "What the hell is up with all the gauges? Calling Captain Kirk, your ride awaits... Phasers on stun...." |
||
06-26-2002, 09:41 AM | #14 |
or '331 LX Eric'
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
|
I've been away for a couple weeks and then I see this. What's going on, Kell?
Chris, if there's an extra spot at the bar, I would be glad to join you. Take it easy, E
__________________
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 40,750 miles 331 cu. in. / Tremec 3550 / BFG Drag Radials 12.22 @ 114.31 mph - w/1.89 60' |
06-26-2002, 11:04 AM | #15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
I see a post like that VERY rarely...
and our forum is NOTHING like Mustangworld other than the fact that most newbie mustang drivers drive the 4.6. Would you rather they go to stangnet and learn how to put in neon undercarriage lights or come hear and learn what a set of 3.73s can do for performance Personally, I love the old 5.0, but the modular motor is here, and whether you like it or not, its going to be here for a while. And actually, stock for stock, the 2nd generation 4.6 SOHC mustang does have more horsepower and IS a bit faster in the quarter mile than a 5.0 GT\LX. I would hope that our 5.0 brothers would accept us and join us in spanking the heck out of all those ricers. (Foreign OR domestic) [/B][/QUOTE] __________________________________________________ _ Personaly I could care less which car is faster......The problem I have is the total lack of respect they have for the 5.0......All they do is talk about stock vs stock.....When is the last time you seen a stock 5.0 at the track. I get along with the LS1 guys way better than the 4.6L guys at the track. I am not talking about mustang works I am talking about all of the crap I have to put up with in my home town. There seems to be some cool 4.6L guys on this site...Hammer/Unit/Stoplightwarrior/CrazyHorse/LizardKing/Mercury....etc... Unfortunately nearly all the 4.6L guys that I personaly know think there car is faster than mine"stock". I lke the new GT's.......Its just that some of there drivers need a reality check, and I am more than happy to provide that reality check every Saturday at West Texas Raceway Park. I have only been in the Modular Madness forum a couple of times, maybe I just had a bad experience. Later,
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
06-26-2002, 12:28 PM | #16 |
I got something to say
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,557
|
So what is the problem man?
__________________
91 LX Hatch 5.0 - made for the twisties 89 LX Hatchback 5.0 5spd. stolen/stripped 4/7/05 http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/...splay.cgi?3494 1987 Toyota Pickup Ricer Haters Club Member #33 Want a custom gauge cluster for your Vintage Mustang? www.jmeenterprises.com |
06-26-2002, 12:32 PM | #17 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
Quote:
Welcome. Take care, -Chris
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
|
06-26-2002, 02:13 PM | #18 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 2,875
|
I think that it is worth pointing out:
1. The latest body style mustang is more popular than ever 2. Buying a new mustang means you have to buy a 4.6L GT 3. We all know about the "Ricer" Fad that is currently on the streets. If anyone of these moron ricers is smart enough to figure out that a mustang is faster than a civic, he's going to buy one and he's going to rice it out. These morons should not be mistaken for true mustang enthusiasts who are purchasing new mustangs (not everyone wants an older car no matter how "cool" the 5.0 is). Yes these ricers are anoying. I was driving yesterday and I saw a Saleen Mustang with euro tail lights, gay rims, and all the customary lights! What a sick thing to do to a beautiful car! These things are going to happen. Let's just hope this ricer fad ends soon. |
06-26-2002, 02:33 PM | #19 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
4.6L-nicely redone
Because performance freaks focus their attention more on the "go" than on the "show" aspect of a car, the FR500's real beauty is underhood. There you'll find a Cobra 4.6-liter 4V all-aluminum block whose displacement has been increased to 5.0 liters by the use of new "spray bore" technology. On engines like the 4.6 that cannot be bored out because of the limited casting thickness of the cylinder walls, displacement is increased by removing the steel cylinder sleeves from the cast aluminum block and spraying the bores with a ceramic-like coating that serves as hardened cylinder walls. While Ford has yet to employ this new technology in production, its use could help squeeze more power from engines without retooling them. New, high-flow four-valve heads with more radical cam geometry are added, along with an all-new variable geometry magnesium intake manifold, dual 80mm mass-air sensors, dual 70mm throttle bodies, and stainless-steel tubular headers. This massaged Cobra engine makes a reported 415 horsepower at 6,800 rpm (redline is 7,000 revs), and 365 foot-pounds of torque at 4200 rpm. But wait—there's more. Putting all that power to the ground is a Tremec T56 six-speed manual transmission with a dual-disc Valeo clutch. A MetalMatrix composite driveshaft spins a Torsen TR2 limited-slip differential with 4.10:1 ring-and-pinion axle set. Ford claims the setup is good for a zero-to-60 launch of a tick over four and a half seconds—-and a quarter-mile sprint of 12.7 seconds at 114 mph. Top speed has been estimated at 175 mph. Forget Camaro and Firebird here—these numbers go beyond even the 2000 SVT Cobra R, and put the FR500 right up into the rarefied performance air of Corvettes and Vipers. |
06-26-2002, 02:37 PM | #20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
oops sorry that was only supposed to show the tech for the new 4.6L they want to put in the new cobras to replace the old 4.6L.
|
|
|