View Single Post
Old 05-16-2001, 01:12 PM   #19
StangFlyer
Founder
 
StangFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1995
Location: Michigan
Posts: 19,326
Lightbulb

NWell, I am not running a solid roller, I am running a hydraulic roller. It's a custom grind Kam Motion stick, that Ron Robart at Fox Lake Power Products scienced out to match my heads and what I wanted to do. I'll never find the true potential of the engine I have probably, as I can only spin it to 6500 RPM... But, I wanted a low maintenance, sturdy, not going to break it engine. I had enough of that in my push it to the limits 302 days...

Regardless, the cam I have is backwards from what you might think. It is around .600" lift on the intake side with a 1.7 rocker and around .575" lift on the exhaust side. Yes, it has more on the intake than the exhaust. The duration is as expected, however, being around 228 on the intake and 236 on the exhaust. All this is on a 114 lobe. Actually a conservative cam for this big of an engine.

When you're making over 550 HP or so, you will actually make more power by having the intake have more lift than the exhaust. It's backwards from a lower HP engine.

------------------
Dan McClain, Editor
The Mustang Works Magazine
ICQ: 2937586 - AIM: DMcClain91GT
1991 Mustang GT - NOVI Supercharged 377 Stroker
1999 Ford Lightning SVT - 2000 Prototype updated by Roush

[This message has been edited by Dan McClain (edited 05-16-2001).]
StangFlyer is offline   Reply With Quote