Quote:
Originally posted by elliotness
Okay,
My post was not in reference to mustangman everyone can see that he was wrong. He did not deny he was wrong.
My post was in response to Blwn93 and his actions to avoid his ticket.
When you tamper with evidence, remove the illegal tint from your car prior to court, you have done something wrong. The act of removing the tint is more egregious than the original violation.
If he Blwn93 made any statement to the court indicating his tint was legal, he perjured himself. That is also wrong.
If he made no statement but led the court to believe that his tint was legal. That is also wrong.
He broke the law again. You must understand that his actions, removing the tint misleading the court, were wrong. *hit they were criminal. So, your argument that he did nothing wrong has a few holes in it.
If you want to say that his actions were justifiable given the trivial nature of his original offense, then say that. Saying that he did "nothing wrong" is just not accurate.
This has been fun, let's try it again sometime.
Elliot
|
LOL!!
Man, you really need to learn to
R E A D. As I've said 2X now.
Blwn93 doesn't have any damn TINT. Never did.
mustangman had the fricken tint. Cripes.
Blwn93 got pulled over for EXHAUST. Yet he had catalytic converters AND mufflers.
You're not making police look real good in the intellegence area right now, LOL.