![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#61 | |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
![]() Originally posted by nastyn8 :
Quote:
The Green Party certainly hates cars on principle and considers them to be the tool of Satan (or something akin to that). Emissions laws have been around for decades - long before the establishment of the Green Party, however, they always want more and more restrictions on auto emissions - to the point of absurdity as well as unfeasibility. Ralph Nader, now 70 and an attorney by trade, gained fame with a 1965 book about the 'dangers' of the Chevrolet Corvair, an early front-wheel drive econocar. He helped speed the car's demise and it went out of production in 1969. Not a great loss. That launched his career as a consumer crusader, mostly focused on the evils of American automobiles and their safety issues, which - back in the '60's and '70's - were plentiful, to be fair about it. Nader went on to be involved in many other 'consumer' issues over the decades and has always opposed 'big business', which he considers the focus of evil in the modern world. (O.K., I'm exaggerating a tad, but I'm not THAT far off). These days, he's playing politics and running for president, just to piss off the Democrats, which he considers - right along with the Republicans - to be effectively 'owned' by those eeeeevil 'corporate interests'. 'Big business' is a major contributor to both political parties because political decisions made in Washington in the form of tax laws and regulations can make or break any large company, so the investors and executives of the large corporations shovel tons of money to both Democrat and Republican candidate's campaigns in order to gain 'access' to the politicians, if he or she is elected. Take away Washington's power to tax and regulate business as it does and that money would dry up, fast. It's a system that is flawed but probably not about to change anytime soon, no matter who is elected in November. The Libertarian party is against the drug laws on a broad principle of individual freedom that, in my view, ignores the wider and equally important concern for a functioning society that isn't encumbered by a higher level of drug addicts being drugged and cared for by us non-druggie taxpayers. Ralph Nader believes that 'marijuana is a medicine' so at best, he's 'soft' on drugs, at worst, he's all for them. We have to take our 'medicine', y'know. Fringe party candidates have always appealed to either special interest groups (anti-business, pro-drugs, you name it) and will always have some attraction for some people. Those who don't like the major party candidates always have another party to vote for, even if that candidate has no chance to win. It becomes a 'protest' vote. In our form of democracy the fringe parties (there are about a dozen on the presidential ballot this year) have a right to exist and to try to persuade as many people as possible to vote for them, for whatever reason. Collectively, they get a tiny percent of the total vote and rarely make a statistical difference, except in razor-close elections, such as we had in 2000. Nader's candidacy (on the Green Party ticket that year - he's an independent this time around) very likely hurt Al Gore and so, helped George W. Bush. This time, Nader is a very, very minor factor and while he'll drain some votes from Kerry, he probably won't affect the outcome of the election, which I predict will be a decisive win by Bush. I hope this helps clarify things for you. ![]()
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner 1990 - 2005 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
![]() Quote:
The American public was not used to the weight distibution of a rear engine car and accidents did occur. Swing-axle rear suspensions didn't help either. Same with Volkswagen beetles and some Porsches that had the swing axle rear susp[ension. The Corvair may have had some other handling issues as well, but it was kind of a neat little car IMHO. The Falcon was introduced by Ford as a direct result and as a competitor to the Corvair. I think the Corvair came out in about 1960. Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe Last edited by Rev; 09-30-2004 at 04:53 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
![]() Originally posted by Rev :
Quote:
The Chevrolet Corvair did come out in '60 and I believe that it was quite popular for awhile but in an era of huge cars that used mass to 'protect' the occupants in a crash, an accident with a Corvair and, say, a '57 Chevy would usually mean serious injury or death to the occupants of the tiny, rear-engined Corvair. That and the 'handling issues' you mentioned were the basis of Ralph Nader's book. He blamed the GM corporation for knowingly producing a 'dangerous' car that was really only dangerous for an inexperienced driver or because of the prevalence of much larger vehicles on the road at that point in time (early 1960's). Once 'cheap' gas became scarce in the 1970's and federal gas mileage requirements became more stringent, smaller cars began to become more popular and we all know where it went from there. By the 80's, the big cars of yesteryear were already dinosaurs and the small but peppy and efficient cars from Japan were the rage. The Chevy Corvair was ahead of it's time and the Ford Falcon was simply a forerunner to the Escort, which sold millions.
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner 1990 - 2005 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Smokes The Dope
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eldorado, Illinois
Posts: 144
|
![]() No biggy there. to be honest with you I hate these cars. they look like they're made so cheap. A neighbor of mine has 3.
I get tired of looking at the damn things |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
![]() Quote:
Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 360
|
![]() I believe the hotter versions were called Monza's. They were capable of about 115-120 mph. The rear weight did cause the rear end to slide around in a sharp corner at speed. Once side ways they were likely to roll.
I was around in those days and couple of my young friends did flip these cars. They weren't nearly as much fun as the later Chevells and Camero's, Fairlanes and Mustangs. But more fun than a Chevy II I always thought they were trying to produce a sporty VW bug with the Corvair
__________________
2003 3.8 Mineral Gray, MAC CAI, K&N, Chin Spoiler |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Government isnt the only corrupt one | smokediver27 | Blue Oval Lounge | 0 | 09-11-2004 04:36 PM |
Only in England (how to make an 8 a 10) | The Deuce | Blue Oval Lounge | 28 | 08-21-2002 02:57 AM |
Do Not Street Race At Port Kells!!! | BowTie Eater 5 Liter | Blue Oval Lounge | 48 | 04-11-2002 03:07 AM |
ENRON: Got what they deserved. | PKRWUD | Blue Oval Lounge | 17 | 01-27-2002 06:05 PM |
What would you do if every little secret the Government had was leaked to the public? | bigwhitecobra | Blue Oval Lounge | 18 | 12-01-2001 11:42 PM |