© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
07-01-2007, 11:03 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 4
|
NEW!!!! Well, I am.
Unfortantly, my car isn't. I wanted to say hi to everyone. I'm new to this site, but a member on a few others. I hope you guys are just as friendly as I will be posting alot of questions about my sixer. Being broke and a woman doesnt help getting my car fixed. So yeah, I'm learning as I go. I have a 98 3.8, please don't laugh...although I do. I had to pick the worst year possible as my first stang. Still loving it though.
|
07-02-2007, 12:26 PM | #2 |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
Re: NEW!!!! Well, I am.
lsustang:
Hi! We do have a forum for 3.8 specific questions under the title 'Small Ponies', which might be of some help to you in the future. For now, we simply welcome you to the 'community' and hope you'll visit us often.
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner 1990 - 2005 |
07-03-2007, 12:33 AM | #3 |
Founder
Join Date: Jun 1995
Location: Michigan
Posts: 19,326
|
Re: NEW!!!! Well, I am.
Hi lsustang,
All Mustangers are welcome here... glad to have you join us.
__________________
StangFlyer 1991 Mustang GT - Supercharged 377 Stroker 2000 Ford Lightning - Project Lightning Hauler Media Center Gallery - View my member photos |
07-03-2007, 08:16 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
Re: NEW!!!! Well, I am.
I think you'll be hard pressed to find anybody that would agree with you that 1998 is the worst of the Mustangs. A lot of users will stand by the 1974-1978 Mustang II as being the bottom of the barrel or 1971-1973 (my least favorite group). The 1998 cars weren't my favorite, but they're not bad.
|
07-03-2007, 09:03 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 4
|
Re: NEW!!!! Well, I am.
Thank you for welcoming me.
Unit 5302...I need to make a correction. Yes the mustang II would have to be the worst of the worst, but I meant replacement parts and upgrades for the 98. |
07-06-2007, 08:35 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
Re: NEW!!!! Well, I am.
Actually, I rather like the Mustang II's. I think most people that dislike them have never driven them. They're much lighter and more nimble than the practical station wagons from 1971-1973. With the 302ci V-8, and they actually performed similar or better than most of the engine options in the previous generation even in a straight line because they weighed about 1000lbs less (not joking about the weight advantage).
Sure, they're basically a Pinto, but as painful as it may be to hear, the fox body Mustang's were similarly related to the Ford Fairline/Mercury Zepher. My first car was a 1977 Ford Mustang II V-8 Fastback with the C-4 transmission. It was quick out of the hole, had a very attractive instrument cluster, well laid out controls, and it was very responsive. I felt it also looked a heck of a lot better than a lot of the vehicles on the road at the time. To each their own though. |
07-07-2007, 12:28 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 950
|
Re: NEW!!!! Well, I am.
I would take one of those
__________________
Alex |
07-11-2007, 06:42 PM | #8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NEW!!!! Well, I am.
welcome to the club eh
|
09-28-2007, 12:06 PM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 4
|
Re: NEW!!!! Well, I am.
Hi everyone, it's been awhile since i've been able to get on. Well, I have done a few things to the stang. Nothing major yet. Lack of money continues to hold back performance plans. But I have removed my pin striping and the rocker stripes, as well as lowered the front end. I have yet to attempt the back but I kinda like it. It looks more like a dragster. How do I post pics?
|
|
|