MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Website Community > Blue Oval Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Poll: Biggest Reputation Liability For Ford?
Poll Options
Biggest Reputation Liability For Ford?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-10-2004, 01:12 AM   #1
Unit 5302
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
Default Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

What car gave Ford the biggest black eye in terms of reliability?

I say it's the 1997-1998 Ford Taurus SHO. Known for an engine that's disposable at random once you hit about 30,000 miles due to timing system/camshaft failures, it's the ultimate embarrassment.
Unit 5302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2004, 09:10 AM   #2
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

I'll agree with that.

Following close behind is the head gasket issues the 3.8L had in 94-95. My sisters mustang blew them twice in three months @ 30,000 miles.

Not Fords fault but they also suffered a big black eye from the Firestone incidents.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2004, 02:13 PM   #3
Mr 5 0
Conservative Individualist
 
Mr 5 0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
Smile Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

While all of the individual failures named in the list were big problems for Ford, the Focus and,to a lesser extent, the Taurus managed to retain customer confidence. Not that many people know about the SHO V-6 longevity issue because they were a niche car and the Tempo and Mystique sold O.K. with many still around. I think the wide-ranging publicity about the Pinto - with the eruping gas tank, seen exploding in flames by millions in living color on TV in the 1980's, really hurt Ford's image for some time, but obviously not in a fatal way. We still buy Mustangs.

I have a '93 Mercury Topaz 2.3 and it's O.K. for what it is (a beater). It was a 'gift' from a friend who didn't want to fix it but wanted to give it to someone who would be able to use it. One new distributor later it ran fine and has for well over a year, with 95k on the clock and a total of over 12,000 miles put on the car by myself and family members. Not bad for a 'free' car. It's clean, too, and while not a head-turner, it's 'reliable transportation' - as they say in the classified ads.
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner
1990 - 2005
Mr 5 0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2004, 09:30 PM   #4
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default Granada

My brand new '75 Granada Ghia with a 351W was my Ford disaster. It was nothing but trouble from the beginning. The only part of the car that was OK was the 351W. The rest of the car was completely shot before reaching 50,000 miles. To top it all off, the car came with 5 brand new Firestone 500's, LOL. The treads started flying off almost immediately. All the tires had failed within one year. I payed for replacements myself as it always happened at highway speeds when I was on a road trip and I ddn't want to proceed without a spare.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 12:00 AM   #5
bmxmon
Registered Member
 
bmxmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 950
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

I have had quite a few friends that had tempo's, and we beat those things like crazy, and they would keep going. (they will go through more mudd than some trucks) They did all, in the end, die. But they were also cheap.
bmxmon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 08:31 AM   #6
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

I'd have to agree with Jim on this one. The Pinto was a major black eye for Ford.
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 12:50 PM   #7
LX5liter
dude5l
 
LX5liter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 603
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

The Pinto was definitly the most publicized one, even though there wasn't as much danger as was reported...I think the Chev truck gas tanks outside of the framerails (73-87 ?) were more of a hazard.
__________________
Good luck!

Brad R.
1992 L.X. 5.0 coupe
MODS: A few little bolt ons
New Best time ...11.60 @ 128 mph @ 2000+ ft altitude.


Rice Haters Club member #39

Users rides #2542
LX5liter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 05:11 PM   #8
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

Quote:
Originally Posted by LX5liter
The Pinto was definitly the most publicized one, even though there wasn't as much danger as was reported...I think the Chev truck gas tanks outside of the framerails (73-87 ?) were more of a hazard.
The Chevy trucks were easier for the national TV news networks to rig gas tank explosions on, anyway, LOL.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2004, 11:16 PM   #9
Capri306
Moderator
 
Capri306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Posts: 1,001
Lightbulb This one might fall under the "wow that's dumb" category

Oh, I have an even more recent one that has yet to be seen as widespread. My dad has a 2000 F-250 Super Duty with the 6.8L V10. He has just hit 80,000 miles, and it blew a spark plug. Literally. The #5 cylinder chucked the spark plug out of its threads (stripped out, of course), and completely destroyed the coil above. Mind you, the spark plugs have NEVER been changed, so it's not like someone changed them and didn't tighten them to spec.

From what they said, the spark plug "somehow got loose and just went back and forth, up and down, until the threads were gone."

It cost over $600 to fix it. This didn't involve removing the cylinder head or any other major components. The dealership just vacuumed out what they could, used a flexible optic probe to see if big chunks of metal had fallen in, helicoiled the spark plug bore, and called it good.

Now, as a (studying-to-be) engineer, I'd say they have a quality control problem. Even worse, the dealership said this is a "common thing" and that they wouldn't/couldn't do anything about it as far as service costs. The very dealer he had bought the truck from would/could not do anything to help, nor did they offer to. Other than a "tough $h*t" attitude, the repair and a lighter wallet is all we got.

What are we giving Ford in return? The assurance that the four members of my family will NOT buy Ford products any time soon. Hate to say it, but it's what we're doing. My dad just put his order in for a 2005 Honda Accord, as did my mom, and I can say from experience that they are fantastic cars in most every respect.

"Quality is Job #1"? How bout STOP THE PENNY PINCHING, THE STRANGLING OF YOUR T1 SUPPLIERS, AND MAKE A DAMN VEHICLE THAT GOES 200K W/O MAJOR REPAIR?!?!?! WE WOULD ALL *LOVE* TO BUY MORE AMERICAN CARS, EVEN IF THEY COST A *LITTLE MORE*, IF THEY'D JUST LAST LONGER. I don't know if it's the engineers or the bean counters (possibly the suits), but someone's got to get the axe.

/rant OFF

FWIW, the '05 Mustangs rock. I will remain faithful to the Mustang always.
__________________
Capri306, Moderator
The Mustang Works Online

1979 Mercury Capri
1987 5.0L Mustang LX Notchback
1993 5.8L Eddie Bauer Bronco
Capri306 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2004, 09:36 AM   #10
LX5liter
dude5l
 
LX5liter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 603
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

Wow, from an F-250 Superduty to a Honda Accord?? He must be REALLY P.O.ed!! I have heard of that problem before though, and Ford probably should have issued at least a technical bulletin on it to the owners to get them checked.
__________________
Good luck!

Brad R.
1992 L.X. 5.0 coupe
MODS: A few little bolt ons
New Best time ...11.60 @ 128 mph @ 2000+ ft altitude.


Rice Haters Club member #39

Users rides #2542
LX5liter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2004, 12:47 AM   #11
Capri306
Moderator
 
Capri306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Posts: 1,001
Default Oh yeah

He's mad, all right. He was mad enough that my poor mother was driving the truck when it happened, but this "screw you, we don't care" from the dealer was a kick in the jakes. The particular Ford dealer in question has been nothing but a pain in the arse to my family, which extends well beyond my father and his unfortunate experience. I wish I knew why Ford doesn't sell directly to its customers instead of through the dealerships. They are antequated and are seriously usurping the company image Ford wants to project. But what is the true culprit in all of this?

It's the Detroit automaker mentality: people will buy whatever crap we put out, because they don't want to buy a foreign vehicle.

Well, they might have half of that right.

But the thing is, most of the 'foreign' cars are built right here, with more American components than any American car maker's product. It's SO SAD, and I hope one day, things turn around. I personally want to do something about it; I'm just busy getting my BSEE right now.

I realize that it's a 'global economy,' Mr. Suit. However, most educated people know that 'global economy' just means 'we want to get it from overseas because it's cheaper, and will send our profits higher.' You don't care HOW you make the profits, you just care if you GET THEM. You've been looking at the Japanese business model for some years now, and yet, you refuse to change. I say to you this: we will lose and they will win, if you do not change.

This type of business plan has absolutely NO FUTURE. You, Mr. Suit, are not thinking long term at all here. If less and less Americans have good-paying jobs, how the heck are they supposed to buy your products? Why do you not see your own demise? Why do you not see that people won't buy cheap crap for long?

Yes, it will indeed be a sad day when the automotive capital once known as Detroit is no longer. The day is coming; no matter how hard you hit these people in the head, they don't see it.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Okay, I've used my soapbox time for this evening. Hope this doesn't come across the wrong way to people, but I believe that some things are going to have to change, or we will all end up losing. My father's experience with his Ford truck was just but a slice of this problem afflicting America, let alone Mustang enthusiasts such as ourselves.
__________________
Capri306, Moderator
The Mustang Works Online

1979 Mercury Capri
1987 5.0L Mustang LX Notchback
1993 5.8L Eddie Bauer Bronco
Capri306 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2004, 03:13 PM   #12
Mr 5 0
Conservative Individualist
 
Mr 5 0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
Post Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

American automobiles have a generalized quality problem and always have. Not every car or every model; my 1990 Mustang 5.0 (bought new by me) has had next to zero factory quality problems in almost 15 years and 125,000 miles, but even 'Stangs have had their share of quality glitches. Not as bad as GM, of course, but still, Ford has had quality problems and we all can name a few.

In my opinion, the corporate penny-pinching stems from a combination of factors: the obvious need for return on investment and stock price stabilty and the union factor, which pushes up some labor costs that Japanese manufacturers don't have. Although all the assembly is now done in America, many car parts for the Japanese manufacturers come direct from Japan, where manufacturing costs are lower. In addition, I doubt that the Japanese auto executives receive mega-millions in annual salary and perks, as their American counterparts do, regardless of how auto sales or the company stock price is doing. They have more sense.

The Japanese have learned economy of design and how to build-in quality and still keep the price affordable. When we bought our new '04 Honda Civic (which replaced a tired '95 Mazda 626 with 141k) about this time last year, we found that a fully-equipped, automatic transmission, Honda Civic LX sedan was priced at $2,000. or even more over the Ford Focus. Even so, I never seriously considered the Ford Focus or any other American car because I knew the quality of the Honda line and the fantastic re-sale value (near 60% of the original price after five years) was well worth the extra cost at purchase. I still do. So do tens of thousands of other car buyers out there. Apparently, Ford doesn't. They will.
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner
1990 - 2005
Mr 5 0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2004, 07:00 PM   #13
Unit 5302
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

It's really unfortunate that the big three have decided it's okay to sell disposable cars to the folks in the US. I used to think the people with 200k on the clock with their Toyota, Nissan or Honda were the lucky few.

I've come to realize, they're the normal drivers. Going 200k without a major mechanical failure is simply taken for granted on their cars. Even the much more reliable than average Fox Mustang 5.0 will likely puke a an AOD or T-5 before then. Fuel pump at 100k, tranny at 130k. At least the engine doesn't automatically self destruct at 120k like a lot of domestics.
Unit 5302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2004, 07:19 PM   #14
aar0s
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: southern Illinois
Posts: 312
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

every so often i hear a nasty rumor that ford has already started moving the mustang to mexico. with co. like toyota (a few friends work there) and bmw and closer to me, asian mfg. moving to the U.S. what IS an american made car now?
__________________
88 gt convertable =-= cobra intake, accufab 65 mm tb headers alum underdrives steeda alum.lca's, springs, c/c plates kyb struts
230 hp to da wheels
http://www.cybersteed.freeservers.com
aar0s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 04:20 PM   #15
Mr 5 0
Conservative Individualist
 
Mr 5 0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

Quote:
Originally Posted by aar0s

every so often i hear a nasty rumor that ford has already started moving the mustang to mexico. with co. like toyota (a few friends work there) and bmw and closer to me, asian mfg. moving to the U.S. what IS an american made car now?
The home office and top executives are in the United States. That's about it.
__________________
5.0 Mustang Owner
1990 - 2005
Mr 5 0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 03:38 AM   #16
Capri306
Moderator
 
Capri306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Posts: 1,001
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

My own 1993 Accord and my mom's brand new Accord were both built right here in the USA. Spooky, huh? It kind of reinforces the fact that we as Americans are more than capable of producing quality vehicles, yet profit margins are more important than the number of people that buy American cars to the Big Three (and a half). What shortsightedness...and that is the true shame.
__________________
Capri306, Moderator
The Mustang Works Online

1979 Mercury Capri
1987 5.0L Mustang LX Notchback
1993 5.8L Eddie Bauer Bronco
Capri306 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 09:21 PM   #17
MEDIK418
Registered Member
 
MEDIK418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Amarillo, Texas, USA
Posts: 780
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

You know, that Honda will ride better but I don't think it'll haul near as much wood.
__________________
1986 four-eyed LX coupe, 358 Cleveland, Tremec TKO600/centerforce clutch, dish cut Probe forged pistons, comp cams hyd.roller cam, .579/.588@224/230, Edel.performer, 670 holley street avenger, CPR custom built long tubes, ported and polished 4bbl heads, manley valves, beehive springs, MSD peo-billet dist/MSD6AL, fluidamper, 5 lug conv. with 17x8 bullits there's more but it's still not finished yet.
Oh, and the oldest boy is turning his 89 GT into a FFR cobra this next summer.
MEDIK418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2004, 11:06 PM   #18
Topless In Texas
Not broken anymore!
 
Topless In Texas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: La Porte, TEXASS :)
Posts: 1,963
Talking Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

OMG! I have been gone wayyyy too long! Kell, when did you come back to MW?? Jim...lol.... my first car was a Pinto. and it sucked.
Good to see ya'll again. man, how wierd.
TNT
__________________
R.I.P. my Kinde..Jan. 19,1992-Aug. 22, 2003. Shes Cruisin' doggie heaven in a Blown Verte or a GTO!!!
2005 ROUSH GT Verte
SuperStallions of the Net Feature, May 2002

RICE HATERS CLUB MEMBER #38!!

O.B.C #5..thank you!! I feel so priveledged!!

BONE STOCK~ Hell, its a ROUSH!
Topless In Texas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 07:07 PM   #19
Unit 5302
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

After hackers attacked and destoyed intelforums, I've been killing time here. Nothing like losing 1000s of hours and dollars all because some 13 year old punk has nothing better to do.

Anyway, the hauling ass point is pretty mute. A TT Mark IV Supra without any money in mods is more than enough to take nearly any stock Mustang ever produced. I find the TT Supra to be less reliable due to a few electrical and cooling gremlins than normal cars from Japanese manufacturers, but still.

My 96 Explorer has been what I consider to be "good to me."

I bought it with 99k, and now with 113k the tranny is starting to get weak. The O2 sensors are shot. The belt tensioner, and thermostat have been replaced. Fuel pump is getting noisy, the U-joints need replacement, the front differential is leaking a little, and one of the hub bearings is going out.
Unit 5302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 07:56 AM   #20
1965GTO
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dupo,ill
Posts: 219
Default Re: Biggest Ford Reliability Disaster

Best Ford I ever owned was a 77 Pinto. Had a 69 Mach 1, 68 Cougar, 88 mustang Gt, and a 65 Thunderbird. Pinto cost the least, got the best mileage, no major breakdowns, easy to work on, and quite good looking. Only problem was alot of rattles, but a loud stereo cured that.
1965GTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs Mach1 Cobra Jet Classic Mustangs 20 07-11-2005 08:06 PM
Before buying a new Ford consider this. Lizard King Blue Oval Lounge 21 03-12-2005 03:24 PM
Carfax mustangLX92 Blue Oval Lounge 1 04-30-2003 12:20 AM
Biggest all Ford drag racing event in SOCAL navymailman Ford Show & Go 5 09-19-2002 12:24 AM
2001 Cobra Over Rated AGAIN!!!?!?!!! Wassup Ford? KillaZ350 Blue Oval Lounge 24 06-29-2001 05:24 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 AM.


SEARCH