MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Website Community > Blue Oval Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-05-2001, 03:12 PM   #1
#1 Pony
Registered Member
 
#1 Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 268
Question Any new news on the 2003-2004 Mustang?????

Anything I've missed in the mags?? Like will they realse them in '03 or '04?
__________________
One who comes with Thunder.
#1 Pony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2001, 08:11 PM   #2
OnMy3rdStang
Registered Member
 
OnMy3rdStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 644
Default

I'm not sure when they are comming out but I have read that the engines wil be downsized to a 3.0 v-6 and a 4.0 v-8 *that sucks* and they maybe getting a makeover. But i am not sure
*haley*
__________________
Danica Patrick is my homegirl
OnMy3rdStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2001, 12:17 PM   #3
#1 Pony
Registered Member
 
#1 Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 268
Default

Why is is when the engine gets smaller they always increase the horse power?
And when they are large there is little power?

Besides what's better a big engine or a smaller one?
Pros and Cons?
__________________
One who comes with Thunder.
#1 Pony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2001, 01:41 PM   #4
Mercury
The Redneck James Bond
 
Mercury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 1,707
Default

I dont think they will drop the current Mod Motors. Everyone says the chassis is to small and light to accomadate the Mod Engine and transmission. That may be true, BUT......

Why has ford used heavier materials in the Dew "Lite" chassis, and Widened it considerably from the T-Bird and Lincoln LS chassis. To me, it only makes sense that that was done to make room for the Mod motor and tranny.

Ford has to much riding on the 4.6 to take it out of the Mustang. The Mustang is where the 4.6 Ford gets its advertising for the realability and strength of the Mod Motors.

There are several diffrent sources and theroies running around on the next Gen Mustang, I guess We'll have to wait and see who is right.

I've been wrong alot before, but I'm willing to bet money that they keep the mod motor, and go with a 5 Liter displacement for it in either 2004, or 2005 as standard. We might see some big guns and bullets flying when and if the Camaro comes back out.
__________________
64 1/2 "D" code Red Mustang Coupe.
Red Baron,

2000 Perf Red Mustang GT. 5spd. Stage 2 CNC heads with Large Valves, Comp Cams (270-274 dur .550 lift), Forged Crank, DRP pistons, Manly H-beams, Pro M 87 mm Mass Air, 24lb Inj, 75mm TB, Plenum Spacer ,Long Tube Headers, Homemade H-pipe, 2 chamber Flows, 4:10's, Steeda Tri-Ax, LKW 70/30's, Eibach Drag Springs, Steeda SubFrames, Battle Boxes, Rear Girdle, Adj uppers, Alunimum Drshft, Southside Lift Bars.

Project Cars, 64 1/2 6cyl coupe, 1930 Model A Nostalgia Rod.
Mercury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2001, 03:07 PM   #5
95mustanggt
Registered Member
 
95mustanggt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 2,875
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mercury
I dont think they will drop the current Mod Motors. Everyone says the chassis is to small and light to accomadate the Mod Engine and transmission. That may be true, BUT......

Why has ford used heavier materials in the Dew "Lite" chassis, and Widened it considerably from the T-Bird and Lincoln LS chassis. To me, it only makes sense that that was done to make room for the Mod motor and tranny.

Ford has to much riding on the 4.6 to take it out of the Mustang. The Mustang is where the 4.6 Ford gets its advertising for the realability and strength of the Mod Motors.

There are several diffrent sources and theroies running around on the next Gen Mustang, I guess We'll have to wait and see who is right.

I've been wrong alot before, but I'm willing to bet money that they keep the mod motor, and go with a 5 Liter displacement for it in either 2004, or 2005 as standard. We might see some big guns and bullets flying when and if the Camaro comes back out.
I would tend to agree with you. The 4.6 has been out for a couple years now and Ford has all the tooling it needs. Plus if they were to change from it it would be less cost effective as they use the same engine in all the trucks. To change from the 4.6 they would/should change the truck engine too, would Ford do that?
__________________
1995 Mustang GT

20016 F150 Lariat Super Crew
95mustanggt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2001, 03:56 PM   #6
fiveohpatrol
I'd rather be basketweaving
 
fiveohpatrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
Default

Quote:
The 4.6 has been out for a couple years now
its been out since like 90 or 91, just not in the mustang till 96

it was in lincolns and i believe crown vics in the early 90s
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516
NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft
fiveohpatrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yellow Mustang Stampede TULSA OK August 17 stylin99 Ford Show & Go 2 11-09-2004 11:19 PM
2003 V6 Mustang Conv vibrates at 55mph eltupac Small Ponies 4 10-05-2004 06:41 PM
2003 Mustang Terminator rbatson Blue Oval Lounge 22 01-11-2002 02:14 AM
2003 Mustang spy photos bigwhitecobra Blue Oval Lounge 14 02-23-2001 04:03 PM
Salaeen, Shelby, Cobra please define these for me. Taqus Blue Oval Lounge 3 01-17-2001 02:39 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.


SEARCH