The only reason we state the engines won't pass emissions, is because it's the truth.
The 5.0 V-8 couldn't pass up coming emissions standards. Ford's top guys said the heads would need to be completely redesigned. Would you consider the development and production costs of an entirely new type of head an easy modification? Ford decided that the 5.0 would have to go, they couldn't justify keeping the pushrod motor when they had to invest about the same in it as they'd have to invest to make a Mustang specific 4.6.
What would happen if Ford were to put a significantly modified Cosworth engine (with different cams to pass emissions) into the Focus here? They'd have to bump the performance of the Mustang to maintain it's performance flagships reputation. Furthermore, since Cosworth is an F-1 engine designer and manufacturer, what makes you think enough of the Cosworth engines could be supplied if a mass production run was setup for the US? I think you'd also find people a little apprehensive about spending 35k on a Focus.
As far as using the technology, Ford already has all their technology. Ford has been manufacturing DOHC V-8's since the 1960's, and they are currently selling most vehicles quite well. Why fix it if it's not broken? Toyota seems to agree with Ford. Basically all they do is look at a Ford product, then figure out a way they can build something almost exactly the same, usually right down to the styling, add a couple mods and market it. Adding different technology adds expense. Adding expense to a lineup aiming at keeping decent cars price competitive is a way to force yourself right out of the market.
Actually I'd say you're mostly correct if you were speaking of Chrysler, but they have their own problems dealing with an overbearing Daimler group.
Anyway, what tech could Ford gain from Mazda (which Ford has no rights to), or Volvo, or Aston Martin, or Jaguar?
GM would no doubt have problems doing anything with tech from SAAB.
|