© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
05-16-2002, 12:35 PM | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
According to numerous FORD technicians...
and the owners manual states 87 octane is the only gas u should burn, unless you have a supercharger. The Ford technicians said that our engine(4.6 or 3.8) is "desingned" to burn 87 octane and burning "premium" could make knocking/pinging worse, as well as harm the engine down the road! This is just really strange to me, wouldnt you want to burn a higher octance gas to keep to keep the injectors, valves, etc.. cleaner?? Whats your guys take on this, just curious??
|
05-16-2002, 01:19 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 2,875
|
The technicians are largely correct. You shouldn't burn fuel with higher octane than 87. The stock engine is designed to burn 87 octane.
Now if you advance you timing, add a chip or supercharger, whatever, you may have to run higher octane fuel. |
05-16-2002, 01:59 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Grass Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 1,389
|
buying a higher octane fuel than your engine needs
is not only a waste of money, but will lose you power.
i used to laugh at the guys running N/A, stock compression motors buying the race gas at the track and wondering why their ET got worse... LOL! my cobra says right on the cluster "use only premium unleaded fuel", of course with the blower, it is all that much more important to use a more stable (higher octane) fuel.
__________________
LX ~vs~ Camaro |
05-16-2002, 03:06 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 471
|
Today's higher octane fuels have the same additives as the 87 octane. The only thing you're doing is wasting money if you have a stock engine.
__________________
'89 LX 5.0 - 5 speed. Original Owner '94 E-150 4.9 Hi-Top Conversion Van '06 Mustang V-6, 5 speed |
05-16-2002, 04:58 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sterling Heights,Michigan
Posts: 129
|
I use sunoco 94 is that a waste? Ihave my timing set to 14 deg.
Will
__________________
SOLD!!! 98Cobra Black on Black Coupe 4.30's DTS diff cover Eaton posi Moser 31 spline axles Spec Stage 2 clutch B&M Ripper shifter BBK off-road x-pipe Steeda pullies Steeda timing adj@14deg MAC cold air Best Time 12.9 @107.5 on street tires New Car 03 Cobra Not Stock |
05-16-2002, 05:07 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: St Louis
Posts: 47
|
pinging
i've never heard of running 92 octane in an 87 and causing pinging. that's going against the grain. but i'm no expert.
for anyone who doesn't understand: the octane rating of gasoline is a scale on which the burning characterstics of gasoline are COMPARED |
05-16-2002, 05:08 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: St Louis
Posts: 47
|
pinging
i've never heard of running 92 octane in an 87 and causing pinging. that's going against the grain. but i'm no expert.
for anyone who doesn't understand: the octane rating of gasoline is a scale on which the burning characterstics of gasoline are COMPARED to gasoline. not how much octane it contains. it contains zero. |
05-16-2002, 05:10 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: St Louis
Posts: 47
|
i meant to say ' COMPARED to octane' not gasoline.
|
05-16-2002, 06:08 PM | #9 |
Mustang Addict
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,294
|
Higher octane gas will take higher temperature/pressure before it combusts than lower octane. That's why you need it for forced induction, advanced timing, or high compression; it prevents pre-ignition, which is when the explosion happens before the spark plug fires because of high pressures and temperatures. I can't really see how it would hurt anything to use higher octane gas, and it doesn't make much sense that it would make knocking/pinging worse. It's just a waste of money if you don't need it.
__________________
Strike down the unroadworthy! 2000 GT Atl. Blue: '03 Cobra motor - 465rwhp/473rwtq, T-56 6-speed, full MM TA/PH & tubular K-member suspension, Saleen body, 17" Torq-Thrust II's, M/T ET Street radials, and lots more '94 Rio Red Cobra: All the bolt-ons, 3.73s |
05-16-2002, 06:44 PM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
If you use higher octane gas, it will not burn as quickly as lower octane fuel. Therefore, you can be left with partially unburned fuel and carbon buildup. Another note, super and premium fuel has a greater chance of containing ethanol, which will decrease your fuel economy.
|
05-16-2002, 07:27 PM | #11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Interesting and helpful feedback guys. Thanks for the responses! I've been burning 87 octane ever since I got my stang a few months ago, but my 2 prior cars said to use "premium" gas only.... thats why I asked.
|
05-16-2002, 07:30 PM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: HELL-The hottest part.
Posts: 20
|
I guess FORD must of made a mistake when they stamped "premium unleaded fuel only" on the fuel gauge on my 98 COBRA...........
__________________
1999 F-350 CC Dually PStroke..1996 SALEEN s281 vert #380 & 1998 Cobra vert |
05-16-2002, 10:11 PM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sterling Heights,Michigan
Posts: 129
|
Well?
So should I continue to use 94 octane or am I waisting my money? Thanks.
Will
__________________
SOLD!!! 98Cobra Black on Black Coupe 4.30's DTS diff cover Eaton posi Moser 31 spline axles Spec Stage 2 clutch B&M Ripper shifter BBK off-road x-pipe Steeda pullies Steeda timing adj@14deg MAC cold air Best Time 12.9 @107.5 on street tires New Car 03 Cobra Not Stock |
05-16-2002, 10:38 PM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 1,311
|
I use 91 cause of my chip. Is that ok??
__________________
Black 2000 GT Auto V2-SQ, Full Steeda G-trac Suspension, Baer Brakes, Saleen Body Kit, Corbeau CR1s, Chrome Cobra R's, etc, etc... 341rwhp, 338 torque 1994 Cobra #4343 Bolt on's only... Cofounder of Raccoon Racing |
05-17-2002, 09:15 AM | #15 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 2,875
|
Quote:
|
|
05-17-2002, 09:20 AM | #16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington Heights,IL
Posts: 231
|
Listen to that rating. I get waaaaaayyy better gas mileage when I use 87 (Not that I care about gas mileage). Premium is a waste of money. It confuses you EEC if you switch a lot too.
__________________
'97 Laser Red GT Coupe Stock 2V (Pulled Silencer) 4R70W Automatic Ripped off a BLISTERING 15.37@90MPH With a 2.21 60ft Just Installed- K&N Air Filter Coming Soon...... -4.10's -Flowmaster A/T or Magnapack Cat-Back |
05-17-2002, 11:07 PM | #17 | |
It's a lot like a race car
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 4,130
|
Quote:
__________________
1987 Buick T-type 1998 HD Electra Elide |
|
05-18-2002, 04:57 AM | #18 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 471
|
cobrazex ...
I do believe this string started talking about a car whose owner's manual stated it should use 87 octane, and most answers were geared to that question. Obiviously, if you have a different engine, and the owner's manual states another octane, I would think Ford stated that for a purpose.
__________________
'89 LX 5.0 - 5 speed. Original Owner '94 E-150 4.9 Hi-Top Conversion Van '06 Mustang V-6, 5 speed |
05-21-2002, 07:20 PM | #19 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mobile, Al
Posts: 108
|
if i run anything in mine less than 91, the valves chatter like crazy. same thing with my old contour svt. since reading these threads i started using 87. no dif (well maybe 1 mpg (WAHOO!!) better). i am just running a pretty much bone stock 98 gt. any insight, people?
__________________
98 GT - Usual "Get in, sit down, shut up and HANG ON" |
05-21-2002, 09:09 PM | #20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
Right off the bat I'll say it's not the valves, which aren't really directly affected by octane ratios.
The preignition generally happens when carbon built up on the piston (or cylinder head) creates a "hot spot." The hot spot is caused by the carbon holding a higher temperature than the metal, and it gets so hot that it inititates combustion before the spark. This is how a diesel engine works without spark plus by the way. Unfortunately, it's a lot more damaging in a gas powered vehicle because there is still a spark. The spark happens a fraction of a moment after the hot spot starts combustion from it's point. The two burning fronts eventually collide with one another which causes a powerful blast noted as an audible "ping" or "knock" from outside of the engine. If you have been running higher octane fuel in your car for an extended length of time and you switch back to 87 octane, not only is there likely to be some carbon buildup due to incomplete burning (see one of my posts above), but the computer is also used to the 91 and it's adjusted for it. Advancing timing causes an issue with lower octane fuel because of the burning properties. Lower octane fuel burns faster and is more explosive than high octane fuel. If you bump your timing too much, you wind up having the piston colliding with the flame front created by the spark. The piston is on the compression stroke, the spark goes off say 15* before the piston reaches the top "TDC" and the flame wave travels so fast, it runs into the piston. If your fuel burns slightly slower, like high octane fuel, your piston can reach the top before the flame front is at maximum force, thereby avoiding a powerful collision inside the engine. 87oct fuel doesn't normall have ethanol, which is generally formulated at 10% by volume in 89+oct fuels. Ethanol has a higher octane rating than gasoline, I think about 104, so adding it is cost effective to increase octane ratings. Ethanol may also burn 50% cleaner than gasoline, but it requires 2x as much ethanol to get the same power as gasoline, so your car burns 2x as much of it. 10% (minimum) formulated ethanol gas will therefore reduce your fuel economy by .10 x .50 = .05 or 5%. That's about 1-2mpg. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Safety Issue 64 - 70 Mustangs | Mach1 Cobra Jet | Classic Mustangs | 20 | 07-11-2005 08:06 PM |
Before buying a new Ford consider this. | Lizard King | Blue Oval Lounge | 21 | 03-12-2005 03:24 PM |
Biggest all Ford drag racing event in SOCAL | navymailman | Ford Show & Go | 5 | 09-19-2002 12:24 AM |
Changes at Ford??? | 93CobraR | Blue Oval Lounge | 3 | 11-02-2001 09:20 PM |
2001 Cobra Over Rated AGAIN!!!?!?!!! Wassup Ford? | KillaZ350 | Blue Oval Lounge | 24 | 06-29-2001 05:24 PM |