MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Classic Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-06-2002, 11:22 AM   #1
jasray
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 11
Default 500 or 600 cfm carb?

I have a stock 289 in my 66.

I was wondering if I should go with a 500 or 600.

I do plan on building the motor up in the next year.

Any help would be appreciated!

Thanks.
jasray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2002, 12:21 PM   #2
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

If you want to run a 2bbl, go with the 500. If you want to go with a 4bbl, go with the 600. Either one will be fine.

Take care,
-Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2002, 02:06 PM   #3
MetalHead
Registered Member
 
MetalHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 76
Default

I have a 67 with a 289 and i when i had this decision about a year ago i went with the 600 cfm edelbrock. there was a big improvement in power and top end speed, just make sure you have an exhaust that can handle it and make sure that you set the idle mixture properly, mine ran way too rich in the beginning and bogged a lot off the line. good luck!

Jason
__________________
67 Coupe 289, 2 1/4'' pipes w/ Flowmasters
Edelbrock 600 cfm 4bbl carb, Edelbrock Airgap intake
Hooker headers, MSD Ignition system

Next: new tranny, T5 or Toploader
MetalHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2002, 09:09 PM   #4
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default

My advice is to get a 600 Holley with vacuum secondaries and then tune it as needed for max performance. Get a Holley book to learn how.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2002, 10:35 AM   #5
jasray
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 11
Default 500 or 600 cfm carbs

Hey!

Thanks for the advice on the carbs!

I will definately go with a 600.

Should I get a performer intake or a performer RPM model?

I really dont know the diff.

Thanks!


Jason
jasray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2002, 02:43 PM   #6
Clark Rodgers
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Rowlett,Texas
Posts: 306
Default

The Performer is a good stock replacement intake it fits and looks like stock but saves alot of weight. It is good up to 5500 RPM where the RPM is good from 1500 to 6500. The RPM is also taller but if you are planing more performance upgrades I would go with the RPM.

Don't underestimate the previous comment on the exhaust, what comes in has to go out, so headers and a good dual exhaust are a must. Your stock 289 will have a hard time using all that fuel and will give you that all familiar black smoke when you get on it.
__________________
69 393W Sportsroof deluxe
Clark Rodgers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2002, 03:45 PM   #7
MetalHead
Registered Member
 
MetalHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 76
Default

It sounds like you don't just want to replace all your parts with stock replacements, but are looking for a more power. In that case I would go with the Peformer RPM, it will go well with that 600 carb. The Performer intake is stock replacement and the RPM is for better performance. I went with the Performer PRM Airgap intake, its the same as the RPM intake but it uses the airgap configuration that they use on their victor series carbs. It keeps the runners from the base of the intake so the mix stays cooler. just my opinion though. good luck

Jason
__________________
67 Coupe 289, 2 1/4'' pipes w/ Flowmasters
Edelbrock 600 cfm 4bbl carb, Edelbrock Airgap intake
Hooker headers, MSD Ignition system

Next: new tranny, T5 or Toploader
MetalHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2002, 08:49 PM   #8
jasray
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 11
Default Performer RPM

Thanks guys!

I will definately get the rpm manifold.

Thanks again!
jasray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2002, 10:30 PM   #9
thehorse
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 13
Default

just a lil horsepower rule: around 2.0 cfm per cubic inch of engine. so i would have to say 600 cfm and if you get the rpm manifold, you might want a little spacer between it and the carb, you'd be amazed of the difference. hope this helps and good luck
thehorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2002, 12:29 PM   #10
jasray
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 11
Default 500 or 600 carb.

Thanks for the input!

Will a rpm manifold and spacer fit under a stock hood?

Jason
jasray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2002, 06:56 PM   #11
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default

Spacers don't always help. They are cheap though ($15-20), and so are worth a try even if they don't help. Do measure the under hood clearance though to make sure you can fit it in before you buy it.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2002, 11:15 PM   #12
MetalHead
Registered Member
 
MetalHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 76
Default

Why would you want to put a spacer between the carb and the manifold? what purpose do they serve and what are the effects? How do you know if they are good or bad for your engine?

thanks
Jason
__________________
67 Coupe 289, 2 1/4'' pipes w/ Flowmasters
Edelbrock 600 cfm 4bbl carb, Edelbrock Airgap intake
Hooker headers, MSD Ignition system

Next: new tranny, T5 or Toploader
MetalHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2002, 01:03 PM   #13
Clark Rodgers
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Rowlett,Texas
Posts: 306
Default

Jason,
without getting into a physics lesson, the spacers help increase the velocity or speed of the air flowing through the carb, but this is hard to judge how much effect it has, especially if it's thickness is under a inch.

The biggest help is dealing with the heat, I use the one like the boss 302 came with it is a composite type material and helps stop some of the heat transferring into the carb which helps it perform better.
__________________
69 393W Sportsroof deluxe
Clark Rodgers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2002, 04:30 PM   #14
thehorse
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 13
Default

the spacer can be properly used mainly on dual plane manifold(performer RPM) with a mediocre flow carburetor will make the manifold function more like an open-plenum design and increasing the plenum volume under the carb will improve airflow and reduces fuel distribution irregularities. It's not that complex.
thehorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
to carb, or not to carb...this is my question. black86notch Windsor Power 4 08-06-2002 08:24 PM
Carb Woahs RoadWarrior Classic Mustangs 4 07-27-2002 11:06 AM
'65 Carb Question Wendell Allen Classic Mustangs 3 07-13-2002 04:54 AM
efi to carb. /? WADS56 Windsor Power 0 09-26-2001 12:45 AM
new carb..but how much cfm?? 69PonyRider Classic Mustangs 4 09-13-2001 07:59 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.


SEARCH