© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
03-29-2002, 03:33 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Paso Robles, Califorina
Posts: 39
|
Money VS 11sec ET
Sup all,
I have been thinking about getting a newer mustang for some more some modern comforts (AC,Stero,Nice Ride) and i was wondering how much money and what kinda mods would i need to take a 95 GT into the Low 11's-High 10's. I don't know alot about these new computer stuff (learned everything from 60's Muscle) and i need some help, also to get a 95 GT into those ET's could i keep it smog legal? Any info Helpfull Thanks Steven PS how much money would these mods cost im 17 and kinda on a budget
__________________
67 GTA Coupe with "S-Code" 390 Best E.T. Never Ran Drive Fast, Race Hard, Beat Ricers. Live your life a 1/4 mile at a time |
03-29-2002, 06:39 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 299
|
depending on your budget, incon turbo's can get you there. i have read articles of people bolting up their 12 psi kit to a stock 5.0 and running 11's on slicks, and pump gas.
__________________
I'm a glutton for punishment. |
03-29-2002, 06:46 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World
Posts: 871
|
oes incon still make a twin turbo kit for the 5.0? i was told that they stopped making them???
__________________
1984 Bronco II, 36" Michelin Military Tires, 95 EFI 5.0, NP435 Tranny, NP208 Doubler, NP205 Transfer Case, Fill Size Solid Dana 44 Front End, WH Progressive Rate Rock Crawling Coils, Bronco 8.8 Rear, Skyjacker Softride Leafs, 5.13 Gears, Detroit Locker. Final Crawl Ratio Of 175:1 88 GT Best 60ft. 2.181 Best ET 14.350 Best MPH 98.01 ~WRECKED!!!!~ |
03-29-2002, 08:42 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA, USA
Posts: 731
|
Two words: ATI Procharger
__________________
Russ L '91 LX - 331 w/ Procharger '03 Cobra Convertible - Pullied '94 Lightning '65 Mustang Coupe |
03-29-2002, 11:07 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Valdese, NC
Posts: 361
|
A procharger would get you there, but it would require a change in cam, heads (maybe), intake, injectors, gear, etc.
Single turbo cars have run high 10's with the stock heads, intake, and cam, although they have been ported. The fuel system was upgraded and a turbo car requires alot less gear. If you wanted to do it with forced induction, a turbo would get you there alot easier than a supercharger. Meanwhile, keeping the stock cam, thus improving your chances of passing emissions. If you compared the costs of the two, the turbo kit cost a little more, but you get alot more in the kit than if you just bought a supercharger. Still it's going to cost you a minimum of $5000 going forced, unless you can find a good used kit somewhere or buid your own turbo setup. The cheapest way to reach your goal would be nitrous, a good set of heads, cam, intake, fuel system upgrades, and a gear could get you there for around $3000. All directions are also going to require a little suspension and transmission upgrades, which I haven't added in. Good luck.
__________________
91 single turbo vert |
03-31-2002, 02:29 AM | #6 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA, USA
Posts: 731
|
Quote:
I won't argue that a Turbo has a lot of benefits. But there are always going to be tradeoffs on both sides of the fence. Is the Incon kit smog legal? I know the Procharger is.
__________________
Russ L '91 LX - 331 w/ Procharger '03 Cobra Convertible - Pullied '94 Lightning '65 Mustang Coupe |
|
03-31-2002, 11:36 AM | #7 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Valdese, NC
Posts: 361
|
Quote:
__________________
91 single turbo vert |
|
03-31-2002, 01:39 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Paso Robles, Califorina
Posts: 39
|
Sup all,
Thanks for the info, i do want to go forced induction but i don't really want to be having to fill a bottle up all the time i was thinking about going supercharger because i have not heard alot of good things about turbos (i think mostly myths coming from old racers), but i was thinking about going with a procharger or vortech, though i was wondering if i could get away with a blown stroker like a 331? could i use the stock cam with this or maybe a mildly modified one? but going back to a turbo, couldn't i run a boost controller and then just turn the boost down when i go to smog it? what kinda suspension and drive train upgrades would i need? could i fit a 9" in the rearend? Any info helpfull Thanks STeven
__________________
67 GTA Coupe with "S-Code" 390 Best E.T. Never Ran Drive Fast, Race Hard, Beat Ricers. Live your life a 1/4 mile at a time |
03-31-2002, 04:08 PM | #9 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA, USA
Posts: 731
|
Quote:
As for the stock 19 lb. injectors in the project car, they were at an outrageous amount of pressure and maxxed out...I did the math to verify. The BSFC had to have been pretty low...too low for comfort if you ask me...but they did run the number. I've been modifying cars for 18 years, and I generally don't believe anything manufacturers or magazines claim regardless if they're for blower kits OR turbo kits. But in my general experience with the Procharger, MM&FF was not far from the truth. The underlying issue, and I think you'll agree, is that you can't bolt on a kit and expect to run the number. Tuning must be performed. The infrastructure must be evaluated. Can the short block hold up? Will the radiator be adequate? Is the ignition up to the task? Will the stock clutch hold ? How about hardened axles? A 6-point bar, a scattershield, a driveshaft loop...all needed to pass tech? How about strengthening the torque boxes, or installing subframes? Are the basic skills even there to pilot a car into the 10s or 11s? I have a hard time believing that anyone can install a turbo kit on a 5.0 and expect to run low 11s without needing additional parts. If what you're saying is true then I bought the wrong kit.
__________________
Russ L '91 LX - 331 w/ Procharger '03 Cobra Convertible - Pullied '94 Lightning '65 Mustang Coupe |
|
03-31-2002, 09:39 PM | #10 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Valdese, NC
Posts: 361
|
Quote:
Both have advantages and disadvantages, do some research into both before making your decision. Try checking www.turbomustangs.com, they have links to alot of good information. I will say this, the newer 2V & 4V motors respond alot better to boost than the older 302's. One of the latest editions of MM&FF has one of our members with a 99 GT I believe. His car has a turbo kit, better fuel system, better transmission, no safety equipment and I believe stock suspension. The stock block hasn't been touched and the heads haven't been off of it. It ran 10.90's on 12 lbs of boost on slicks.
__________________
91 single turbo vert Last edited by 91GTturbo; 03-31-2002 at 10:12 PM.. |
|
03-31-2002, 09:52 PM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: middleburg, fl, usa
Posts: 1,134
|
Tony gonyon at hp performance in middleburg florida built a turbo car for his girlfriend that has ran a 10.85 @125.8 on slicks.
The car is an 85 or 86 and has a e303 cam, gt-40 iron heads, 3.55 gears, and an aod. Not including safty equiptment and exhaust that is it. The car went low low 11's on the stock heads. Here is a video of the car running an 11.04 second pass. BTW: All this was done on pump gas. O-yea, you could be sitting next to the car with it running and you would swear it was stock untill you see it run.
__________________
James Cox RHC Member #44 nochevy@hotmail.com 1991 Mustang LX Dart iron eagle block, 4340 28oz 347 crank, 4340 h-beam rods, probe ultra light pistons canfield heads “race ported by Brent Frazier”, solid roller cam and lifters “custom grind”, kooks 1 7/8" race headers, and much more. Engine built by Brent Frazier. |
03-31-2002, 10:10 PM | #12 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Valdese, NC
Posts: 361
|
Quote:
I do agree that tuning is the most important thing when it comes to blown cars. It dosen't matter how much you have in it, if it isn't tuned right, you can either end up with a boat anchor or a high priced, slow car. I, nor would anyone else I hope would believe you can just add one of these kits and expect to run those kind of times. An automatic can eliminate the driver skill needed to pilot a car too those times. Yes other things like suspension, safety equipment, and a better cooling system have to be addressed before those times can be achieved. With the ability to turn up and down the boost when I want and the fact I don't have to turn my motor to high rpm's to make boost, is just a big plus in my book. As I said both have pros and cons, it all up to the person to decide.
__________________
91 single turbo vert Last edited by 91GTturbo; 03-31-2002 at 10:15 PM.. |
|
03-31-2002, 10:55 PM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: middleburg, fl, usa
Posts: 1,134
|
O-yea I did forget about the performer rpm intake, 75mm throttle body, mass air and injectors.
__________________
James Cox RHC Member #44 nochevy@hotmail.com 1991 Mustang LX Dart iron eagle block, 4340 28oz 347 crank, 4340 h-beam rods, probe ultra light pistons canfield heads “race ported by Brent Frazier”, solid roller cam and lifters “custom grind”, kooks 1 7/8" race headers, and much more. Engine built by Brent Frazier. |
04-01-2002, 12:35 AM | #14 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA, USA
Posts: 731
|
Quote:
I have the old issue somewhere...buried in a stack I'm sure. As I recall Craig Radovich from "Radical Racing" did the install. Totally agree it is hard to believe the car went 11s with stock injectors. Again, that wouldn't have been my choice of fuel system. As for the skills to drive a 10 or 11 second car, IMHO there are a lot of skills needed beyond those involving the tranny. For one, isn't there skill required to control a 500-600 hp car with bias ply tires or slicks at triple digit speeds? Steering input is poor and the car wants to wander all over, especially at the big end. You guys who have done this know what I mean. Again, JMHO. FiveO: Your friend's car sounds impressive given the relatively few mods it's received. L8r
__________________
Russ L '91 LX - 331 w/ Procharger '03 Cobra Convertible - Pullied '94 Lightning '65 Mustang Coupe Last edited by NO SLO PK; 04-01-2002 at 12:59 AM.. |
|
04-01-2002, 07:10 AM | #15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: middleburg, fl, usa
Posts: 1,134
|
Did you see the video? Look close, he is still running the ponny wheeles. Can you say sleeper!
I want one!
__________________
James Cox RHC Member #44 nochevy@hotmail.com 1991 Mustang LX Dart iron eagle block, 4340 28oz 347 crank, 4340 h-beam rods, probe ultra light pistons canfield heads “race ported by Brent Frazier”, solid roller cam and lifters “custom grind”, kooks 1 7/8" race headers, and much more. Engine built by Brent Frazier. |
04-01-2002, 09:13 AM | #16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
My sisters boyfriend is running 12.26 @110mph @3000ft.. With a Holley systemax intake a Steeda #19 cam Full exhaust, slicks and a 150 shot. On a 94 GT.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
04-01-2002, 11:06 AM | #17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Paso Robles, Califorina
Posts: 39
|
Sup all,
Thanks for the great info, what do you all think of a 331 with a turbo or supercharger? what kinda horsepower would i be making like that? what else would i need to get to my desired et? would there in any way i could pass emissions like this? thanks for all your help STeven
__________________
67 GTA Coupe with "S-Code" 390 Best E.T. Never Ran Drive Fast, Race Hard, Beat Ricers. Live your life a 1/4 mile at a time |
04-01-2002, 07:54 PM | #18 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Valdese, NC
Posts: 361
|
Quote:
__________________
91 single turbo vert |
|
04-02-2002, 03:37 PM | #19 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Paso Robles, Califorina
Posts: 39
|
Sup all,
Ok i was looking around and what about doing a 351W swap in then running like a small supercharger/turbo and run like 5-6psi? would this be more worth while to do rather than do a stroker? Thanks for the info its helped alot so far STeven
__________________
67 GTA Coupe with "S-Code" 390 Best E.T. Never Ran Drive Fast, Race Hard, Beat Ricers. Live your life a 1/4 mile at a time |
04-02-2002, 06:23 PM | #20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Valdese, NC
Posts: 361
|
I don't have any experience with a blown 351 setup. I think that all the turbo kit manufactures have designed their kits around the 302, not sure about the supercharger guys. A 351 takes up alot of room under the hood, to get a turbo or supercharger to fit in there as well might takes some custom work which will cost you more money. A stock 302 block is more than enough to reach your goal without strocking it.
The 99 GT I mentioned earlier than ran 10.90's and did it on 12 lbs of boost. You don't have to run and ungodly amount of boost to reach your goal, if that's where you were heading with the 351 and only 6 lbs. I give you an example of a friends car with the same turbo kit I have, only he has a 60-1 turbo where I run a TO4. He has untouched GT40 iron heads, GT40 lower intake & box upper, 70 mm TB. He has the same injectors and mass air as me. On 10 lbs of boost he made 411 rwhp. He ran 15 lbs one time at the track and his transmission decided it didn't like the additional hp, so he hasn't gotten any new times out of it yet. I don't want to sound like it some simple thing to just slap a turbo or supercharger and a few good parts on a mustang and be able to make the kind of hp needed to run low 11's. My friends car is running perfectly, mine isn't, that's why mine is in the shop getting new headgaskets & heads. The tune has alot to do with it.
__________________
91 single turbo vert |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To save money which is better, new bumper cover or a used one for painting??pls READ | 96_4.6 | Blue Oval Lounge | 1 | 12-18-2002 07:55 AM |
But its not about the money.... | Hammer | Blue Oval Lounge | 12 | 08-30-2002 12:59 PM |
Money VS 11sec ET | 67GTACoupe | Modular Madness | 4 | 03-30-2002 11:32 AM |
Rant about Wasted Money and Bad Workmanship!!! | Mustangbelle306 | Windsor Power | 10 | 01-23-2002 01:41 PM |
wow i finally have some money for mods | RAGE_5.0 | Blue Oval Lounge | 5 | 10-25-2001 09:13 PM |