![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 85
|
![]() Does anyone have a link to a site that has detailed #s on the 2002 Gt? HP, 0-60, 1/4 mile...etc...
__________________
2002 GT Convertible Premium pkge, MACH 1000 system Remote Starter, Billet interior dress up kit |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 42
|
![]() Me personally, i dont worry what the manufacturer claims. Chevy is always wrong on the LS1, and I have seen faster stock GT's go quicker then what they were told.
__________________
Email: Blackfang@attbi.com 1997 Cobra FRRP 4.30's, Lakewood d/s loop, Steeda Tri-Ax, Mac o/r h pipe, Magnaflows, K&N 2000 Z/28 Ram Air, EGR mod, Lid w/K&N, Flowtech cutout |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Trisket
Join Date: May 2002
Location: University of Florida, FL Posts: ½
Posts: 1,560
|
![]() ure absolutely right blackfang...but im interested in what ford says my 2002 gt would do too...cuz i dont exactly wanna run my brand new car down the track...hehe
__________________
University of Florida - Physics Major My 02GT vert Media Center Pics BBK Underdrive Pulleys | K&N FIPK (Gen II) | Bullet Grille | Mach 1 Chin Spoiler | UPR Interior Parts | XM Radio | Audiobahn Subs Ricer Hater's Club Member #1/2 (30) http://www.ricehatersclub.com/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Mustang Addict
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,294
|
![]() Not sure what Ford claims, but the tests I've seen got about 5.4s 0-60 and low 14s 1/4 at almost 100mph for a 5 speed hardtop. An auto will be a couple tenths slower, and so will a vert.
__________________
Strike down the unroadworthy! 2000 GT Atl. Blue: '03 Cobra motor - 465rwhp/473rwtq, T-56 6-speed, full MM TA/PH & tubular K-member suspension, Saleen body, 17" Torq-Thrust II's, M/T ET Street radials, and lots more '94 Rio Red Cobra: All the bolt-ons, 3.73s |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 85
|
![]() just curious, what is it that makes a vert slower?
is it wind resistance? weight?
__________________
2002 GT Convertible Premium pkge, MACH 1000 system Remote Starter, Billet interior dress up kit |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
HEY I CAN SET A NAME NOW!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,556
|
![]() The GT Coupe ways 3317lbs, compared to the GT Convertiable that ways 3477lbs. So ya're looking at 160lbs difference. And I'm sure there is abit of windresitance too
Sam.
__________________
1969 Mustang Mach 1**Sold** ![]() 351-4V Windsor, 4 Speed MACH 1 - Moving At The Speed Of Sound. 1979 Mustang Indianapolis 500 Pace Car **For Sale - Email me for Info** 302-2V, 3-Speed Auto One of 2,106 made One of 405 sent to Canada. Yes those are caution lights, and No you can't pass me when there on. ![]() ![]() Ricer Hater's Club - Member #4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
All about the Windsor.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,052
|
![]() It's really just the weight.....the wind resistence difference between a hardtop and a convertible is minute.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|