This should be an easy decision...

[nismo280]

Hi Everyone!!!... I'm just looking for individual views and opinions.


I'm gonna be buying a Mustang in the next three weeks or so (whenever my truck sells)... I've done all the research I could possibly do. I've driven all (except the 99+). Concerning Insurance costs, reliability, depriciation, and performance, which would be the better choice, a 1996-1998 Cobra Coupe, or a 1999-2000 GT Coupe... we're talking about 45 hp difference... but what about suspension, transmission, mileage, interior design... how much different are the 96-98 body stlyles from the 99+ body styles? I wont be adding power ... I'll be taking it on rather long trips often (1,500 miles), but there will be a great deal of city driving too (average 21,000 miles per year). I'm not into racing, I just want a car, but there is always that lil devil on the shoulder poking at you to get the performer.

Thanks for everything...
Tony

[nismo280]

What a night!!!...


I just found:

http://forums.mustangworks.com/showt...t=new+for+1999

If you have anything more to add, thanks.

[bigbandjohn]

Hi.

Since you are looking used on both sides of the equasion, I would personally get the Cobra! Ignoring the performance arguments before, overall you are starting with a much more loaded car for the price. Handling is far better as well. I have a 96 Cobra I got used in 2000, and 80000 mile later I am extremely happy with it (note that 60,000 came during 2001 while relocating).

That's my pick, However, for you the key is drive both. Try to get a feel for handling and accelleration. Check your personal comfort. Check for control location. Whichever fits you better is what you should probably get. If you don't notice a difference, then perhaps the GT is the right car for you. Best of luck!