View Single Post
Old 09-13-2002, 02:18 PM   #10
The Deuce
Registered Member
 
The Deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,325
Default

Here's what I don't understand.

In 65 you could get three differnt v-8's.

2v (hydrolic lifters) (?)
4v (hydrolic lifters) 'a' (?)
4v (solid) 'k'

Now the k-code was rated at 271, and the A at 225. That's 46 difference where as my 97 to a 99 is 45.

Is an A code 289 a 'turd'? Do people ask, "why on earth would you buy an a code?

No. And those were the same year. If my car made 260, and the new ones did too, people would still complain.

Can we maybe get some of these whining threads locked down? Its getting old.
__________________
1997 Mustang GT "The Freak" - 13.80 @ 101.70, 2.07 60'
1995 Honda VFR750 - not much @ really fast (actual data pending.)
1964.5 Mustang 289

Rice Haters Club Member #13
The Deuce is offline   Reply With Quote