Pro-M

97snakedriver · 07-04-2000, 09:16 PM

Well, the bedate of the merits of Pro-Ms and other replacement MAF has gone on for quite some time. A lot of people have gotten very different results. But I figured I would just throw this out:

I ordered a Pro-M 80mm along with matching K&N from Steeda. When I installed it I also reset the computer. Installation took maybe 20 minutes. After it was installed I drove around for about 1.5 weeks without doing anything too exciting.

Finally I took it out on the G-Tech for some runs. Got back to back 4.9X runs, followed by a 5.0X, all made with conservative 1700 step off launches. Later that week I went on a 4 hour trip. With moderate trafic on interstates going though the mountains of Western VA, I got 26 mpg.

Basically I picked up almost .2 0-60 and 1.75 mpg or 7%

The Pro-M deffently isn't cheap, but those are pretty good results for a fairly simple mod.

Just thought I would share.

07-04-2000, 09:16 PM	#1
97snakedriver Registered Member Join Date: May 1999 Location: Blacksburg, VA Posts: 1,526	Pro-M Well, the bedate of the merits of Pro-Ms and other replacement MAF has gone on for quite some time. A lot of people have gotten very different results. But I figured I would just throw this out: I ordered a Pro-M 80mm along with matching K&N from Steeda. When I installed it I also reset the computer. Installation took maybe 20 minutes. After it was installed I drove around for about 1.5 weeks without doing anything too exciting. Finally I took it out on the G-Tech for some runs. Got back to back 4.9X runs, followed by a 5.0X, all made with conservative 1700 step off launches. Later that week I went on a 4 hour trip. With moderate trafic on interstates going though the mountains of Western VA, I got 26 mpg. Basically I picked up almost .2 0-60 and 1.75 mpg or 7% The Pro-M deffently isn't cheap, but those are pretty good results for a fairly simple mod. Just thought I would share.